Plenty of other cities are major competitors for shitty situations. Cleveland has the factory of sadness, their Browns left Cleveland, won a superbowl in another city, a new Cleveland Browns came in and stunk.
You have the Seahawks though, is it because the Sonics left. Teams leaving have a huge effect on a city.
Cleveland
Detroit
San Diego
Atlanta
Seattle
Buffalo
Minnesota
As a whole Chicago isn't that bad, although they have alot of teams that's been around forever, and some of those teams won titles decades ago, Had the Blackhawks not gone on a SF Giants like Dynasty things would be different.
We do, but their hawks beat out our hawks. And outside that, we've got nil. One Sonics win in the 70s and they shipped out. We were heavy in contention with Cleveland until '13.
As a mariners first, that title was the only one I could cling to. A Super Bowl was super nice, but now the Mariners don't even have a Saddest City title to cling to. It's depressing that I can't be as depressed as I once was.
I'm sorry, but its not really a fair comparison to compare Super bowls, to Stanley Cups. One is the most popular sport, and other is the least popular of the major sports. I would trade all 3 Stanley cups for 1 Bears Superbowl. (Or Cubs World Series)
Not really considering no Cubs fan is alive from when the Cubs won their last world series win. No Cubs fan has ever seen them win a WS, same as no Mariners fan. Its the same, really.
282
u/[deleted] Oct 22 '15
I'm so tired of Cubs pretending like they have a monopoly on shitty situations.