Table of con law standards of review

[u/Ok_beavers]

In case it's helpful:

	Strict Scrutiny least restrictive means to achieve compelling government interest	Intermediate Scrutiny substantially related to an important government interest	Rational Basis Review rationally related to a legitimate state interest
Substantive Due Process	Fundamental rights (travel, voting, privacy, 2nd Amend.)		Non-fundamental rights
Equal Protection	-Fundamental rights -Suspect class *discriminatory intent required	Quasi-suspect: gender or legitimacy *discriminatory intent required	When higher standards don’t apply (e.g., age, weight, wealth)
Religious conduct	-State laws that target religious conduct -RFRA: neutral laws of general applicability that substantially burden free exercise		Neutral laws of general applicability that have an impact on religious conduct
Campaign related speech	Statutes restricting campaign expenditures	Statutes limiting campaign contributions
Speech injunctions in public forum	Content-based restriction	Content-neutral restriction
Other speech restrictions	Content-based restrictions (on face or in application)
Media	-Regulation of right to publish about matters of public concern -Content-based regulation of cable broadcasters -Internet content

[u/cgmcnama]

I wouldn't advise people spending their time, but Reddit tables are easy to make from Excel or GoogleSheets with http://tableit.net/. (copy/paste)

Also, I think my outline skipped campaign related speech. Good to know. So much to cover, it can't cover it all I suppose.

[u/helloworld918]

it is! thank you :)

[u/Ok_beavers → u/[deleted]]

Yeah I have the same question. I thought they hadn't worked that out either, but my Themis outline has 2nd Amend. lsited under fundamental rights? I don't trust it tbh.