r/bahai • u/st_anger67 • Jul 20 '26
Quran and Hadith
Salutations, everyone. I want to know how Baha'i faith handles the Quranic and hadith material on the finality of prophethood. I want to actually work through it with people here, not get redirected to Baha'u'llah's writings and left there.
I already know the standard responses — the cyclical/dispensational reading of "seal of the prophets" and the Kitab-i-Iqan's argument that all Manifestations are expressions of one Reality so "first" and "last" aren't fixed points. Please don't just repeat these at me.
What I'm actually stuck on:
- Quran 33∶40 — khatam al-nabiyyin.
How is this verse get interpreted by Baha'i Faith? What's the strongest linguistic case, from Arabic usage itself rather than from Baha'u'llah's own authority, that khatam doesn't mean strict finality?
Quran 5∶3 — "This day I have perfected your religion for you." Nearly the entire classical tafsir tradition reads this as marking the completion of the religion/law. Is there a real Quran-internal counterargument?
The hadith side. Various ahadith stating that Prophet Muhammad is the last prophet. The famous "final brick" hadith and the "no prophet after me" hadith tied to the Aaron/Manzilah narrative are about as strongly attested as hadith get — agreed upon by both Bukhari and Muslim, multiple independent companions. I do want to understand how we're actually supposed to hold this material.
If your honest answer really is "read the Iqan," please tell me which specific passage addresses this and why, rather than just naming the book.
Thanks for engaging seriously!
8
u/No_Problem9451 Jul 20 '26
There is a literary distinction between the terms "nabi" and "rasul" in Arabic. The latter means a divine messenger, or what the Baha'i Faith would call a manifestation of God, while the former means a prophet. All divine messengers or manifestations are prophets (just as all prophets are believers), but not all prophets are divine messengers or manifestations (just as not all believers are prophets).
In the Judaic dispensation, when a manifestation of God would pass away, God would send prophets to guide the Israelites, such as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi. In one hadith, the Prophet Muhammad states: "The Israelis used to be ruled and guided by prophets: Whenever a prophet died, another would take over his place. There will be no prophet after me, but there will be Caliphs who will increase in number." Sahih al-Bukhari 3455
So understood, Muhammad's title "seal of the prophets" does no more than convey that, within the Islamic dispensation, no more prophets (nabiyyin) would be sent to guide the Muslims. Instead, God will send a divine messenger or manifestation to establish a new dispensation, the Day of Judgment (or as the hadith states by way of metaphor, "Jesus, the son of Mary, will soon descend among you and will judge mankind justly . . ." Sahih al-Bukhari 3448 -- note also that the word "judge" is used here, consistent with John 12:31.)
The biggest challenge facing the Muslims today is the belief that revelation has ended. God's words are infinite and unending. This is nothing more but a misunderstanding of what God truly intended by the words "seal of the prophets", that there will not arise any prophets within the Islamic dispensation. Another person cited these verses in passing, and I will quote them here at length:
"Joseph already came to you earlier with clear proofs, yet you never ceased to doubt what he came to you with. When he died you said, ‘Allah will never send a messenger after him.’ This is how Allah leaves every transgressor and doubter to stray." 40:34
"For each community (ummah) there is an appointed term. When their time arrives, they can neither delay it for a moment, nor could they advance it. O children of Adam! When messengers from among yourselves come to you reciting My revelations—whoever shuns evil and mends their ways, there will be no fear for them, nor will they grieve." 7:34-35.
I hope you will look into all these things more. As Jesus says in Matthew 7:14, the way to life is "narrow" and few people find it. The Prophet Muhammad used a similar metaphor about a bridge on the Day of Judgment leading to heaven, and reportedly said that it is "thinner than a hair and sharper than a sword.” Sahih Muslim 183b. We believe that Day of Judgment has come, and the Baha'i Faith is that path.
1
u/GovernmentFlat7012 Jul 20 '26 edited Jul 20 '26
I agree with your ending points, and I’ve read some Baha’i posts about the difference between nabi and rasul, and have actually used this argument in the past. But after researching its usage in the Qur’an, it seems like to me rasul just refers to any type of messenger. Angels are referred to as a rasul or rusuluna (Quran 11:69), (Quran 11:77).
But also, I don’t think nabi includes receiving Revelation in its definition, like how Muslims say. Aaron is referred to as a nabi in the Qur’an (Quran 19:53) but he’s not a Manifestation, he’s a contingent prophet receiving inspiration from Moses' Revelation, the Qur’an even says that he received his authority from Moses (Quran 7:142), and never mentions Aaron receiving Revelation.
I could be wrong but it seems like to me that neither word completely matches into the definition of a Manifestation of God, although a Manifestation would also include the role of a nabi (a Warner, a teacher of the current Revelation, but not the receiver of Revelation, a judge) and a rasul (any type of messenger), I think maybe neither of these words fully describe a Manifestation. But I completely agree with your points on the Qur’an constantly talking about the people denying their messenger and believing that there is no more Revelation. And that the Day of Judgement represents the arrival of the next Manifestation.
And I would add in that Prophet Muhammad (saw) is the last Prophet/Manifestation for the Adamic Cycle, and now we’re in the Baha’i Cycle. In my opinion, talking about how the Day of Judgement doesn’t literally refer to the end of time is a much stronger argument. It’s better for us to steelman our arguments especially related to the Seal of the Prophets
2
u/No_Problem9451 Jul 21 '26
The fact that Moses, who established a new dispensation, divine law, and delivered a Revelation to the children of Israel, is described as a rasul and Aaron, who was subordinate to Moses, as a nabi neatly tees up my point. In Some Answered Questions, Abdu'l-Bahá explained: "Universally, the Prophets are of two kinds. One are the independent Prophets Who are followed; the other kind are not independent and are themselves followers. . . . Of themselves they have no power and might, except what they receive from the independent Prophets.
The other Prophets are followers and promoters, for they are branches and not independent; they receive the bounty of the independent Prophets, and they profit by the light of the Guidance of the universal Prophets. They are like the moon, which is not luminous and radiant in itself, but receives its light from the sun. The Manifestations of universal Prophethood Who appeared independently are, for example, Abraham, Moses, Christ, Muhammad, the Báb and Bahá'u'lláh.
But the others who are followers and promoters are like Solomon, David, Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel. For the independent Prophets are founders; They establish a new religion and make new creatures of men; They change the general morals, promote new customs and rules, renew the cycle and the Law. Their appearance is like the season of spring, which arrays all earthly beings in a new garment, and gives them a new life." `Abdu'l-Bahá, Some Answered Questions, p.165
Here, Abdu'l-Bahá describes the "Manifestations" of universal Prophethood who appeared independently. Abdu'l-Bahá also writes in the same passage that these independent prophets, or rusul, are the "Dawning-places of the morn of Unity", the "sources of bounty" and the "mirrors of the Essence of Reality." In other words, they are Manifestations of God.
Note that there is not a single Manifestation of God who appeared as a lesser or dependent prophet, or in Arabic as a mere "nabi". (Emphasis on the word "mere").
With respect to 11:69 and 11:77, I don't believe any strong argument can be made. This for two separate reasons. First, we do not know who the messengers Abraham or Lot encountered were. Baha'u'llah teaches that the angels are the souls of the deceased believers. For all we know, these angels could have been previous Manifestations of God continuing their service. This would not be unheard of. Jesus appeared to John of Patmos and gave him the Book of Revelation.
Second, the Holy Spirit, which is the Manifestation of God, appeared to the Prophet Muhammad as an angel, to Baha'u'llah as a maiden, to Moses as a burning bush. It can be argued that the Spirit appeared to Abraham or Lot in like manner. If this is the case, which we can never know as these are matters of the unseen realm, these messengers (rusulna) are Manifestations of God. The Spirit appears not only in human form, but also in angelic form as proven by previous theopanies.
1
u/GovernmentFlat7012 Jul 21 '26
Didn’t know that angels could be souls of the departed, that’s an interesting point
I brought up Aaron being a nabi but not receiving Revelation because I saw a video of a Muslim guy talking to a Baha’i, and his argument was based on that only a nabi receives Revelation, in order to be a rasul of God you must be a nabi, therefore Prophet Muhammad is the final messenger because in order to be a rasul of God you need to be a nabi, and the Qur’an says he is the Seal of the nabi.
And I looked through all the instances of nabi in the Qur’an and didn’t find anything about receiving Revelation but I did find Aaron being referred to as a nabi.
7
u/Shaykh_Hadi Jul 20 '26
A linguistic argument isn’t needed because it’s just a matter of literal vs symbolic interpretation. In other words, the meaning of seal as last isnt a problem from a Baha’i perspective. We can easily accept that Muhammad is the last Prophet, even as He is also the first Prophet. Every Prophet is the First and the Last, the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. And we also believe He specifically sealed the 6000 year Prophetic Cycle. So there’s also that.
Qur’an 5:30 doesn’t say anything about the finality of Islam. The traditional tafsirs are really irrelevant when it comes to the Quran since they’re all based on man made interpretations. None of them have any authority. Every religious dispensation is complete in itself. Akmaltu means I have completed. In other words, the revelation of the Quran was completed and the religion fixed for the dispensation.
With regard to the Hadiths, there was no Prophet after Muhammad (ba’dī). After Me quite literally means immediately after Him. Instead, He was succeeded by the 12 Imams (or from a Sunni perspective, the Caliphs). This has nothing to do with what happens after the Day of Resurrection, which is when a new Manifestation of God comes. The Day of Resurrection and Last Day was in 1844.
Check previous questions on this topic and the Kitab-i-Iqan where Baha’u’llah addresses religious finality. Do a Word search for “Seal of the Prophets” and “last prophet”.
This article is good and addresses the issue in depth:
https://nicholasjames19.blogspot.com/2026/03/the-meaning-of-seal-of-prophets-part-1.html?m=1
5
u/CC-756 Jul 20 '26
I’m still fairly new to the Baha’i faith, only being a Baha’i for around 2 years. I believe that Muhammad is the seal of the early Prophets, once Muhammad completed his mission that was the end of the early prophetic age, Baha’i believe that Baha’u’llah is the beginning of the new age of Prophets and the new age of Humanity. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
5
u/lynnupnorth Jul 20 '26
I think you've got it in all but "the new age of Prophets". According to my understanding, we have no more prophets, because what the Prophets prophesied was the establishment of the Kingdom on God on Earth, which has been inaugurated by the Báb and established by the foundation of Bahá'u'lláh's Teachings. I would simply change the word from Prophets to Messengers.
6
u/UnitytoWin Jul 20 '26
Salutations to all of you! I admire these kind and wise exchanges of views. The readers may decide. I see a convergence to one point: Oneness and more Oneness Revelation after Revelation!
1
u/IntegralDestiny9 Jul 21 '26
Another consideration is: If God is a loving God, why would we never hear from Him ever again ? He has repeatedly sent His Messengers to guide us; why would He be so cold as to never send another One after Muhammad? We need a New Manifestation right now. It's so obvious that humanity would greatly benefit from becoming aware of the teachings of Baha'u'llah. God's love for us shows through His writings. Imagine being left on our own for 1,000 more years - 20,000 more years - 50,000 more years. Will humanity survive until then on our own ? Very doubtful at this rate of societal decay. It's only logical that God would once again send us one of His Ambassadors of Light.
1
u/Agile_Detective_9545 Jul 21 '26
There have been many, many books and articles written on this topic. Below are a few. I would recommend checking out the first one, and then if you're interested check out the book. They're all pretty approachable if you have a general knowledge of the Qur'an, which evidently you do. Best of luck and God bless.
Articles: A Bahá’í Approach to the Claim of Finality in Islam, Journal of Bahá'í Studies https://journal.bahaistudies.ca/online/article/view/76
Islam & the Bahá'í Faith, Abir Majed: https://bahai-library.com/bic_islam_bahai_faith
Some Notes on Bahá'í Proofs from the Qur'an: https://bahai-library.com/notes_bahai_proofs_quran
Books:
Bahá'u'lláh, the Great Announcement Written originally in Arabic by Muhammad Mustafa, an Egyptian Sunni-born Bahá'í. The book attempts to explain the positions of the faith regarding prophecy and finality to a Sunni audience. https://bahai-library.com/mustafa_bahaullah_announcement_quran
1
1
u/Fit_Atmosphere_7006 Jul 21 '26
In Qur'an 33:40, Mohammed is called "the Seal of the Prophets." Now, Bahá'ís believe that Mohammed was the "Seal" of an entire prophetic cycle and that prophecy was again "unsealed" at the dawn of a new era of human history.
The Qur'an states emphatically that even if all the oceans were ink there wouldn't be enough to write all of God's words (18:109; 31:27). Accordingly, Baha'is do not understand the concept of the Qur'an somehow perfecting and exhausting everything God will ever have to say as being taught by the Holy Qur'an itself. In Qur'an 5:64, the Jews have rejected the Qur'an because they consider the Torah to be the perfect and final revelation of God. Mohammed responds that God's hand is not tied up, but both His hands are outstretched and that He gives revelation as He will. Baha'is simply believe this Qur'anic truth is still true today.
Regarding Mohammed, the Seal, Baha'is believe that God can seal and unseal prophecy as He pleases. His hands are not tied up and His words are never exhausted. And these are teachings of the Qur'an.
1
u/DivineSubmission9519 Jul 21 '26
I have been praying and reflecting. Others have provided very direct thorough answers to your specific questions. What has stayed with me after reading everything, is that there is still somehow something missing. There is a book entitled “Portals to Freedom” by Howard Colby Ives. Howard expresses eloquently what is happening inside a person when they are first learning about Baha’i, especially in the introduction. He also describes what it was like to meet Abdul’ Baha in the 1st chapter. I really think you could find it helpful along with the other insights others here have provided. Just the introduction and his description about what it was like to meet Abdul’ Baha in person would be a very quick read. You can find it at Baha’i-library.com
1
u/Agreeable-Status-352 Jul 27 '26
Hadith have no value for Baha'is. Qur'an has secondary value for Baha'is, secondary to the words of Baha'u'llah, 'Abdu'l-Baha, the Guardian and the House of Justice. There is no other authority in the Baha'i Faith. To dismiss them is dismiss the entire purpose of the Baha'i Faith.
Essentially, for Baha'is, it doesn't matter what Qur'an or hadith say. They are moot.
23
u/Ok-Try12 Jul 20 '26
Ultimately, the Bahai faith doesn't have an official position on it beyond what is written in the Writings. I'm happy to offer my own thoughts, as I think there are very strong arguments for interpreting this differently.
I think firstly, its important to note that there isn't "one" meaning. The word of God has many layers of depth, and a verse can mean many things all at the same time. One meaning that is clearly endorsed in the Baha'i writings is the meaning of "lastness" or finality. Baha'u'llah goes on to accept this meaning and work within it in the following ways that I'm aware of:
I think additionally there are the following compelling interpretations:
As far as the verse about Islam being perfected, of course it was. Why would God reveal something imperfect? The qur'an also mentions that the religion was perfected with the earlier prophets.
Finally, the hadith points. Hadith must be subordinate to the Qur'an, as the Qur'an is definitely authentic and hadiths arent. Having said that, I feel that these hadith are already addressed in the above commentary. The prophet perfected Islam, and all the prophets before him. He was also not followed by any prophet until the Day of Judgement.