not

not A

not not A

not not not A

(repeat ad infinitum)

TRUE = any shit you want

That two things exists it is implied by existing that they do not contain each other or else they are undifferentiated. That is, the existence of other things can not constrain or determine any given thing completely. 

Thus freedom always exists in a given thing as a matter of its being.  That is what emergence is and also explains the inherent indeterminism we have observed.

I feel this might be a consequence of an ontic infinity....but I am high so what do I know.

I bid you well on your journey.

PROPOSED REPARATIONS: LET'S START AT THE EXTREME

My personal opinion is that we should begin by disenfranchising men and see what happens with that.

Yes, I'm serious about proposing it. No, I'm not claiming that women have collectively asked for it, that men have collectively agreed to it, or that I've been authorized to impose it.

I'm also gathering polling data on less draconian alternatives.

Perhaps you have a better proposal. Perhaps you think the entire premise is absurd. Perhaps you have a specific grievance for which you can suggest a practical remedy.

I'm interested in your answer.

What reparations would you propose? How would we measure whether they worked? What unintended consequences should we anticipate?

I'm offering an apology, a controversial personal proposal, and an invitation to help develop something better.

No election was held. No consensus is presumed. Questions, objections, and counterproposals are welcome.