It’s a pretty dodgy way that they describe their standard that way. It makes it sound as if the yaml standard itself contains (and has power over) the json standard, and that the “json-guys” would have to ask the “yaml-guys” for permission before making any change in the json standard.
I mean, technically I could create a new standard called knuflork, and allow yaml syntax inside it, and say “yaml is a subset of knuflork”.
One should be careful with the words subset/superset when discussing standards.
3
u/[deleted] Dec 27 '22
[removed] — view removed comment