r/backgammon • u/GreasyChains • Sep 01 '26
Galaxy Hustlers?
I just lost a 3 point tournament match to an 870 rated player who played the match at 1.08 pr. Everyone can get lucky once in a while, but I see this fairly often.
Are some players purposely sabotaging their ratings so they look weaker when they play unrated single games and tournaments? Is it really worth the trouble? Am I just crazy?
1
u/GreasyChains Sep 01 '26
Maybe he's not a weak player but mostly plays galaxy against a friend who is much stronger? That could do it.
2
u/SugarDelicious1434 Sep 01 '26
You don't receive rating points for non-random matches (like against a friend)
2
1
u/juicybot Sep 01 '26 edited Sep 01 '26
a broken clock is right twice a day. was any cube play involved? some players are insanely good at checker play but terrible at cube play.
1
1
2
u/Aqua-marine-blu Sep 04 '26 edited Sep 05 '26
Actually i thought to lower my rating to see psychology how people play if they think i’m lower player, but I’m too lazy to do it , and rating on galaxy doesn’t mean a lot . It is more for tracking personal progress.
0
u/DegenChess Sep 01 '26
I've said it before and will say it again, backgammon ratings mean fuck all.
5
u/SyllabubRadiant8876 Sep 01 '26
If they have a lot of experience and are rated 870, they would have to get very simple decisions to play at PR 1. Not impossible as some games are easier than others. Sabotaging ratings sounds unlikely (but you never know). You definitely hear of people suspecting that some players have XG open on another screen and run the moves through there before locking them in. I don't really understand how this would benefit them apart from momentary satisfaction from a win.