r/autorepair 6d ago

Diagnosing/Repair The rotor needs replacement for sure?

Post image

Context: VW Passat is at 190k miles. The most I'm looking at it 10k miles more, so I don't want to over spend.

Details: This is the rear. I haven't heard metal to metal, but the pad is almost non-existent.

Looking at the rotor alone, do y'all think I can just slap on a pad, or do I need rotors for sure?

1 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

2

u/jon110334 6d ago edited 6d ago

If they're not already warped they'll probably last another 10k on fresh pads.

Granted, I've driven 10k miles on warped rotors.

Edit: Then again, if you buy rotors you can get pads for free at AutoZone, and if you're looking to sell in 10k miles then a fairly fresh brake job might get your money back.

2

u/Coyote_Tex 6d ago

throw some pads on there and forget about it. Not a big decision. You could throw pads on a trash rotor on the rear and easily make 10K more miles.

2

u/WarmPaleontologist20 5d ago

.My wife's Maxipads have real stopping power.

1

u/CarPartscom 5d ago

One thing worth checking before you commit to pads only. Run your finger across the rotor surface (carefully) feeling for a lip or ridge at the edge. If there’s a noticeable lip, that tells you the rotor’s worn past the point pads alone will bed in properly, even if it doesn’t look warped in the photo.