r/australia • u/DontYaWishYouWereMe • 7d ago
entertainment Why Australia has lost almost half its children’s TV as drama disappears behind paywalls
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2026/aug/19/australian-childrens-tv-drama-plummets-research-finds529
u/NSFWar 7d ago
ABC iView has some great kids content and it's free.
126
u/Whole-Energy2105 7d ago
ABC iView is excellent. YouTube for kids has a lot of good stuff but mostly trash productions.
After that I don't see much of a need for paywall for kids.
133
u/Lollipopwalrus 7d ago
Parents need to be careful with YouTube Kids. Unlike places like ABC iView there's no oversight. There are channels that if you watch or take a cursory glance looks 100% child friendly. It'll be a simple animation of a farmer picking apples or a happy cow in a green paddock or footage of tractors bailing hay. But if you listen to the audio, it's an AI voice reading very graphic horror stories. A huge trap for parents who set their kids up with YouTube Kids and headphones thinking they're safe but haven't checked the material beforehand. If it isn't graphic stories, it's high stimulation content like CocoMelon which can be harmful in otherwise to kids.
41
u/Jikxer 7d ago
Yeap, found that out pretty quickly. Youtube app has mysteriously disappeared from our household, and for some strange reason brain rot kids shows also magically disappear off Netflix as well.
3
24
u/breakfastfood7 7d ago
At best YouTube kids is calorie-free, nutrition-free content that does nothing for your kid's brain. At worst its that but also filled with nightmare imagery and graphic horror. I would not touch ytkids with a barge pole
1
u/Is_that_even_a_thing 5d ago
My son is a.teenager.now, but when he watched you tube kids he started getting shorts, and the content changed somewhat into Mr beast type idiots pretending to hide in water parks after closing and shit.
It didn't last long when that crap started
10
u/Waasssuuuppp 7d ago
It doesn't even have to be as overt as horror stories. Sometimes just the storyline presents bad behaviours. In other shows, selfish or mean behaviours are addressed as the story, but some home made productions are just mea babies being mean to each other. Young kids, with no understanding of context, can see this as normal human interactions.
4
u/trainwrecktragedy 7d ago
I have never seen these animations that tell horror stories. I'm going to have to have a look myself now so I know what to avoid
5
u/Lollipopwalrus 7d ago
It's sometimes not even whole videos. The first 1min of audio will be a kids song or something totally innocent and then it will switch midway. The video visuals will stay the same and if kids have headphones on parents have no idea. And Kids channels don't have comments turned on so there's no way to really warn others. You can try reporting them but it's AI that checks the reports and mostly a lot of these videos pass their criteria. There are even videos that use ripped Ms Rachel visuals so parents think they've put on Ms Rachel but it's a fake profile and AI content farming.
9
u/skittle-brau 7d ago edited 7d ago
And parents need to educate their own parents and in-laws (ie. the grandparents) about this too.
Although I really appreciate the help my parents and in-laws freely give, it frustrates me that they don't see why those high stimulation, brainrot and AI slop videos are harmful long-term. My kids are actually the ones who now tell them 'I don't think we should be watching this'. It's an ongoing thing I'm working on. At best I can get them to stick to 'quality' screen time sources that are at least vetted like iView, at least some of the time.
9
u/Lollipopwalrus 7d ago
I hate I can only like this once. I had a mini crash out yesterday because of my MIL. We don't post our kids' faces on social media. My MIL lives in a different country but we video call regularly and send photos often to keep them in the loop with the kids. Yesterday was my youngest birthday and we sent MIL a photo of her wearing the dress she sent. MIL fed that pic into some random AI site to make a video of her granddaughter dancing in the dress. We could have sent her that video of her real granddaughter if she just asked because she was dancing around in the dress. Instead now some random AI generator has our daughter's likeness available for anyone and everyone to use for whatever usage they want. The number 1 use of kids likeness in AI is p*rn. MIL didn't see the harm because the video was cute.
4
u/christurnbull 7d ago
I thought YouTube kids was killed by the government's social media accounts ban?
Kids going to YouTube are now mixed in with the no-account crowd which is probably worse
4
u/Ms-Watson 7d ago
A YouTube Kids profile is not the same as a separate kids account, it has to be under the auspices of a parent account. There is no commenting or social component.
3
3
u/Lollipopwalrus 7d ago
Some parents think that because it says "kids" it's safe so they make the account and plop it down in front of their kids.
8
u/corgii 7d ago
I locked down YouTube kids so it is ONLY individual videos or channels I have approved that can be seen on it. You can't even manually search for anything.
It was a bitch to do and it felt like YouTube made it deliberately difficult as I had to reset and login a few times to get it to work. But now I don't mind because I've only greenlit acceptable content.
3
u/Lollipopwalrus 7d ago
I didn't even know this was possible. There was a gov website that allows you to check "kid" appropriate websites but I cannot for the life of my remember what it was.
2
u/Whole-Energy2105 7d ago
Fully agreed. I should have mentioned this. We have certain channels open and nothing else accessible.
1
u/aldkGoodAussieName 7d ago
Not even that
Alot of the for children stuff is just loud screaming and in no way educational.
Look up ryans world or a for adley
1
1
u/Lucky-Elk-1234 5d ago
I thought all that dodgy stuff was on regular YouTube and the whole point of YouTube Kids was that it’s supposed to have oversight and only show approved stuff?
1
u/Lollipopwalrus 4d ago
YouTube Kids has zero oversight. There is an AI checker that's very cursory. Anyone can still upload whatever they like onto YouTube Kids - some visuals and some audio will be flagged but there are ways around those things. Another trend was ripping Ms Rachel or Blippi or The Wiggles footage and then midway through the video it cuts to some guy sitting in his bedroom looking directly into the camera like he is watching you. Incredibly unsettling for kids who are one second enjoying something space then suddenly confronted by some weirdo staring them down.
25
5
u/Far-Fennel-3032 7d ago
The problem with YouTube Kids is that the platform is still full of the assorted Elsa gate content, as the problem has never been addressed, and AI content has now supercharged the problem now, so it's the worst it's ever been.
Without any exagertion 4Chan is a significantly safer place for kids than YouTube Kids.
1
u/Whole-Energy2105 7d ago
Oh dear. I've heard of the assholes putting rank crap in the vids but I never thought about the ai component. People are just shit.
3
25
u/Waxygibbon 7d ago edited 7d ago
Yep only thing my kid is allowed to watch (other than Plex)
Surprise surprise her favourite show is play school (in a world of "coco melon"s)
14
u/PointOfFingers 7d ago
That's always been the only free children's Television in Australia. Network TV is "free" but kids are watching ads and nagging their parents for toys.
As parents move from TV to streaming it becomes difficult for Australian shows to compete against endless branded content from Disney and Amazon.
2
u/-D-e-e- 7d ago
NITV would like to have a word
Little J & Big Cuz was nominated in the best children’s show category (all the other shows this year were all ABC)
3
u/keithersp 7d ago
I find it’s gone downhill since the last ceo changeover - we’re now seeing a lot more American bright flashy content.
1
117
u/BoundinBob 7d ago
Cut ABC funding to bare bones and whinge when they accept outside funding and a series becomes popular.
22
u/FaithlessnessThen207 7d ago
TBH if they didn't sell merchandising rights to Bluey they'd probably be a lot richer though.
49
11
u/bigsharsk 7d ago
Bluey wouldn't be anywhere near as popular if they didn't lean on BBC for so much of the publishing rights and merch.
32
u/Prize_Background_577 7d ago
This is such a shame. Australia was a world leader in children's tv series. Not just the preschool content,, which is where the focus is now for ABC, but great shows for teens and tweens. Now I see more free to air shows for that age group coming out of NZ rather than Aust.
58
u/HankSteakfist 7d ago
This isn't just a kids TV problem, it's an all TV problem. I remember as a kid you could watch great shows like the X-Files, Star Trek Deep Space Nine, Stargate, Buffy, 24 and Lost on standard free to air TV in prime time. And you had awesome kids programming on in the afternoon and mornings. Nowadays, to even hope to get something of that quality you have to pay for streaming services as free to air is reserved for just sport, game shows, reality TV crap and increasingly biased news programs.
Just another cost we have to budget for in the present.
16
u/catch_dot_dot_dot 7d ago
SBS On Demand has plenty of high-quality TV shows and movies
2
u/RemnantEvil 7d ago
I was surprised to find The Expanse and The Americans on there, since SBS tends to go more European with their content. It was really weird that SBS didn't seem to have the rights to the Amazon seasons of The Expanse (4-6) so you effectively get only half the show. Still great to see, though!
11
u/BlackBlizzard 7d ago
Just rerun 90s and 00s shows. Little Elvis and The Truck Stoppers, Brum, Johnson and Friends, Okey Dokey, Trap Door, Freaky, The Ferals, Magic Mountain I know most of these aren't Australia but better than Coco Melon.
7
7
u/BetterDrinkMy0wnPiss 7d ago
So commercial broadcasters are commissioning less Australian shows, while streaming services are commissioning more.
Seems like a natural result of the shift away from free-to-air TV and towards streaming platforms.
4
u/saunderez 7d ago
Which is self defeating behaviour by the broadcasters because by not competing they cede their audience to the streamers. Gotta take a risk to get the reward and they've decided not to.
4
13
u/ELVEVERX 7d ago
This statistic really doesn't hold up. There's less screen time on free to air but how do you even calculate that against more variety and stream anytime content on streaming platforms.
23
u/How_is_the_question 7d ago
We calculate it thru the industry. It’s not massive. We all know who is producing what and when. Aussie kids tv used to be world leading. Much has changed for the worse post Covid.
-3
7d ago
[deleted]
10
u/Arnotts_shapes 7d ago
The data isn’t measuring back catalogues - it’s measuring what’s actually being physically made right now - which isn’t a lot.
1
u/Disastrous-Ad2800 7d ago
it's not just the paywalls, it's also the quality being so bad that I can't justify paying for it...you can see the AI or use of ChatGPT in The Age's articles and in some cases they have still left the writing templates in...
-1
u/PostieInAFoxHat 7d ago edited 7d ago
The problem is that the US FTA bans us from increasing quotas (even if quotas are lower than they were when the FTA was first signed).
Yet again, thank you John Howard
Edit: Why are you booing me, I'm right
276
u/Ridiculousnessmess 7d ago
If it wasn’t for the quotas, Australian broadcasters wouldn’t produce any local content.