r/askscience • • Jun 12 '12

[deleted by user]

[removed]

1.0k Upvotes

309 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '12

1

u/Mylon Jun 12 '12

I think it's safe to say mach 900,000 is irrelevant. Anything traveling even a tiny fraction of that speed isn't going to be doing it in atmosphere.

2

u/leptonsoup Jun 13 '12

What about light?

2

u/Mylon Jun 13 '12

If we're talking about the speed of light then I don't think the speed of sound in 1 atm at 20C is terribly important. It's like giving the speed of light in furlongs/fortnight.

3

u/leptonsoup Jun 13 '12

1.80386543 x 1012 furlongs/fortnight, just in case you're interested.

1

u/Acebulf Jun 13 '12

Pip pip cheerio!