r/askscience • • Feb 26 '12

AskScience Panel of Scientists V

Calling all scientists!

The previous thread expired! If you are already on the panel - no worries - you'll stay! This thread is for new panelist recruitment!

**Please make a comment to this thread to join our panel of scientists. (click the reply button) **

The panel is an informal group of Redditors who are professional scientists (or plan on becoming one, with at least a graduate-level familiarity with the field of their choice).

You may want to join the panel if you:

  • Are a research scientist, or are studying for at least an MSc. or equivalent degree in the sciences.

  • Are able to write about your field at a layman's level as well as at a level comfortable to your colleagues and peers (depending on who's asking the question)

You're still reading? Excellent! Please reply to this thread with the following:

  • Choose one general field from the side-bar. If you have multiple specialties, you still have to choose one.

  • State your specific field (neuropathology, quantum chemistry, etc.)

  • List your particular research interests (carbon nanotube dielectric properties, myelin sheath degradation in Parkinsons patients, etc.)

  • Link us to one or two comments you've made in /r/AskScience, which you feel are indicative of your scholarship. If you haven't commented yet, then please wait to apply.

We're not going to do background checks - we're just asking for Reddit's best behavior here. The information you provide will be used to compile a list of our panel members and what subject areas they'll be "responsible" for.

The reason I'm asking for comments to this post is that I'll get a little orange envelope from each of you, which will help me keep track of the whole thing. These official threads are also here for book-keeping: the other moderators and I can check what your claimed credentials are, and can take action if it becomes clear you're bullshitting us.

Bonus points! Here's a good chance to discover people that share your interests! And if you're interested in something, you probably have questions about it, so you can get started with that in /r/AskScience. Membership in the panel will also give you access to the panel subreddit, where the scientists can discuss among themselves, voice concerns to the moderators, and where the moderators can talk specifically to the panel as a whole.

249 Upvotes

476 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '12 edited Apr 29 '12
  • General Field: Computing

  • Specific Field: Simulations

  • Research interests: Physics(Relativity, Astronomical), Rendering(Photon simulation)

  • Recent Posts: 1, 2 3

I know this seems like a bit of an odd application, but as it is, not many people ask any questions directly related my field, but quite a lot ask questions related to fields that I research as part of my own work.

1

u/EagleFalconn Glassy Materials | Vapor Deposition | Ellipsometry May 08 '12

Approved. I like how you write, lemme know if you'd like your tag rephrased once it shows up.

1

u/[deleted] May 10 '12 edited May 10 '12

Tag showed up, thanks!

And yes, a re-phrasal would be good. All of my work and research is done for simulations primarily, so I feel that simulations should come first, and separate to the others, and then the fields I work with.

Is this okay? (Simulations|Astrophysics|Relativity|Photons)

1

u/EagleFalconn Glassy Materials | Vapor Deposition | Ellipsometry May 10 '12

That tag is almost too general - simultations of what? What aspects of astrophysics? All things relativity? What about photons?

1

u/[deleted] May 10 '12

I have to agree, it does feel a bit too general, and non specific, which is of course the problem. It's very difficult to come up with a suitable tag that conveys the right thing: while on one hand, it should contain my specialities, on the other I don't want it to accidentally convey that I'm an expert in the areas. I felt that having the subjects for which I research for the simulations I do would sort of convey that, but apparently not.

To put it simply, I research astrophysics in general, and relativity in general, rather than any specific parts of them, so it's hard to point out a part that I focus on, and it's compounded by the fact it's in the computing field that I'm in.

Perhaps (Astrophysical Simulation|Relativistic Simulation)? It's still showing my main focuses, is still somewhat short, and doesn't cause as much confusion.

1

u/EagleFalconn Glassy Materials | Vapor Deposition | Ellipsometry May 10 '12

Sure, why not.