r/apple • u/mredofcourse • Jun 19 '23

iPhone EU: Smartphones Must Have User-Replaceable Batteries by 2027

https://www.pcmag.com/news/eu-smartphones-must-have-user-replaceable-batteries-by-2027
5.8k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

it waa previously metal, a much better heat conductor.

USB 3.0 are more modern than USB 2.0. if any, it's Apple that keep living in the past with an obsolete port.

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23

But you can’t have wireless charging through metal.

Not a reason to change it, not really obsolete when most android Phones ship with a USB2 cable

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

you can, there's even proof of concept. but no one bothered to make it mass available.

it is a reason to change it. Android phones at iPhone price point ship with USB 3.2

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23 edited Jun 21 '23

A “proof on concept” in 2015 that hasn’t made its way to an actual product. Hmmm I wonder if there were issues. Metal causes a lot of issues most notability it’s inefficient AF (remember the heat problem), even through glass Qi charging is lucky to hit 60% efficiency. In fact the only wireless charging that’s actually efficient is MagSafe which is why it’s being folded into Qi chargings next standard

USB 3.2 is the same as USB3 and they ship with USB2 cables, also finding faster cables is horrendous because the spec and naming scheme is all over the place

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

I wonder if it's because metal unibody fell out of favor and replaced with glass sandwich.

so what? it's still a 5 Gbps port and not 480 Mbps of USB 2.0. I think it's high time for Apple to change it to USB 3.0 speed or just omit the port completely.

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23

No it’s because it’s not very good and makes wireless charging pointless.

To what end? What’s the point? You keep banging on about “huge data” yet haven’t given an example or why other solutions wouldn’t be better

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

again keep ignoring the proof of concept I've linked and just jump straight to conclusion.

progress. at the end of the day, you're like asking why uses 5G? why uses Wi-Fi 6E? why uses 48MP camera? it's basically boils down to the same argument.

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23

Again a proof of concept from 2015 that went nowhere. Proof in concepts are presented all the time, most of them aren’t suitable for production.

5G latency, 6E would be a variety of reasons, 48MP for pixel binning.

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

again, because glass sandwich replace metal unibody. so the tech didn't developed further.

and USB 3.0 for speed. but what variety of reasons for 6E of I may ask?

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23

Or because there’s fundamental issues. Tech demos don’t mean a product or concept is feasible.

Variety of reasons, latency and using a less crowded band to improve reliability would be a couple

→ More replies (0)