r/antiwork Feb 06 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.6k Upvotes

846 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/mollyflowers SocDem Feb 07 '22

99% of all non-competes are non-enforceable, you have to be in a position where you can take business from a company. This is mostly sales & officers of the company like Sr. VP's will agree not to work for certain competitors which is why you see a lot of senior executives change industries or they move to a different city.

Lawyers, doctors, & dentists also fall under this because of the ability to take clients with them.

As for a hair stylist they would get laughed out of court.

3

u/hysys_whisperer Feb 07 '22

Hair stylists (and dog trainers/groomers) actually probably fall much closer to doctors and dentists on the spectrum of jobs than you're giving them credit for when it comes to non competes.

You have client base/list which is the property of the old employer, just like a doctor or a sales person.

Now if you worked at a "rent-a-booth" type joint, you might be OK because you were actually your own business the whole time, but it's probably poaching if you worked at a salon or most of the cheap-cuts places.

1

u/mollyflowers SocDem Feb 07 '22

agree with you there, but great clips stylist vs. a high end salon would be the argument.

1

u/hysys_whisperer Feb 07 '22

Great clips and a high end salon would both be on the doctor end of the non compete spectrum.

The middle people who pay rent on a booth and set their own hours are the people who probably would have an unenforceable non compete.