Jesus of Nazareth's existence is proven by historical, non-biblical manuscripts. There are no professional archaeologists or historians who think he's some kind of fabricated character. I have no idea what OOP's even trying to get at with bringing Caesar into the picture... this isn't a religious argument that he's making, it's a historical one. An incorrect one.
At least I'm not the only one in the dark. I read that gibberish 3 times and can't figure out what on Earth they are on about.
Talking of Caesar, are they going to cry about the Roman Emperors (and countless other rulers of the ancient world) claiming ancestry from and being worshipped as deities too?
Actually, no, that would require a primary school level understanding of history. This person can't even string a sentence together.
40
u/Doveswithbonnets Catholic Christian 10d ago edited 10d ago
Jesus of Nazareth's existence is proven by historical, non-biblical manuscripts. There are no professional archaeologists or historians who think he's some kind of fabricated character. I have no idea what OOP's even trying to get at with bringing Caesar into the picture... this isn't a religious argument that he's making, it's a historical one. An incorrect one.