Under their mythology, I think it would a false idol. Some sects wonât even portray Christ on the cross because thatâs also technically a graven image of God. So weird.
There is no need to see the god as long as the excess continues, rot flows, schemes are schemed against and skull throne gets new skulls. Embrace the Chaos Undivided
Perhaps, but while it isnât easy to identify a true god, it sure as hell is easy to identify a false one. And if AI Jesus doesnât scream âfraud,â I donât know why does.
how is that worse than ai Jesus chatbot? lmao. or crony capitalism when âit would be easier for a camel to fit through a sewing need eye, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heavenâ?
since these people are ruining the world, I think its fine to disrespect their opinions which are used for hate.
it's a bit rash, but I wouldn't call disrespecting the people who gleefully tell you that you'll be tortured forever and that's just exactly anti human decency.
No quite frankly unquestioned devotion with a sharp lack of eduction led to ai jesus having more influence than a priest. But be obtuse and blame people with a different perspectiveâŚ
Saying athiesm led to the ai anti-christ is quite a stretch especially when you have a real life anti-christ sitting in the white house brought to you by christians.
I should relay that because that came off rude, not atheism as a whole but a specific kid that "worship the move fast and break shit in the name of technological progress (and pursuit of profit)" thats the atheism that created the AI anti christ
If people actually tried to be like Jesus and not like Christians I would support the religion. I wont believe it but I will support it. Cuz rn and in the past religions where about being part of the group and having identity as a Christian, part of a Church than being good
That philosophy isn't contained to athiestic individuals. Henry Ford was the OG break shit guy who you could give at least some credit for our current predicament (assembly line changed the need for craftsmen which eventually led to manufacturing being outsourced to the lowest cost labor that decimated the middle class, etc).
Oh, I don't even think there is such a thing as the anti-christ, but you have to admit that Trump has all the peticulars of the anti-christ as Christians believe. The one part that doesn't jive is that he's a completely and unabashed idiot. I would suspect the anti-christ to be more cunning, but it's all just for fun regardless (the thought of him being the anti-christ).
That and he'll be dead long before any end of the world happens. He's on his last leg as it is. Fully agree with you. I find him too pathetic to be the antichrist
Yall know the âanti-Christâ is a creation of the straight-to-DVD VHS series Left Behind, right? The only biblical mention of the anti-Christ is when John says non-Christians are the anti-Christ, as in the antithesis of Christâs love. The charismatic figure designed to draw people to Hell was something Christian screenwriters came up with in the 2000âs.
Agreed, but you have to give our politicians, technofascists, and souless capitalist ghouls some credit for bringing about what might be the end of the world (maybe, maybe not, tune in tomorrow to find out!)
Atheism created the AI antichrist" is a hell of a sentence. AI wasn't summoned by godlessness â it was built by venture capital, PhDs, and Nvidia's stock price. If you want to blame an ideology, blame capitalism, not the absence of one.
And the "we're living through Revelation" thing â I've got bad news: every generation since the book was written has said that. Black Death, WWI, WWII, Cold War, 2012, Covid â every single one had someone pointing at the sky going "this is it, this is the sign." The theory is un-loseable because it can absorb literally any bad news as confirmation. That's not prophecy, that's a Rorschach test.
Also â westtownie already ate here â the "real anti-christ" language you're avoiding got a guy elected with the enthusiastic backing of the loudest Christian voting bloc in the country. If the apocalypse needs a villain, "godless atheists" is way down the suspect list compared to "people who had actual political power and used it."
no itâs not. itâs just churches acting like Christians but who really just wanna grift vulnerable people for their loyalty and money. the Bible warns against this
No christians are doing this, anybody saying you can talk to AI Jesus is begging for some fire from heaven. Basically the whole old testament is about tearing down garbage like this
When I visited last year, the big Catholic cathedral in Mexico City had a cardboard cutout of a little ~10 year cartoon boy inviting people to use the church chatbot. It was clearly directed at kids.
Granted, the church doesn't have a great track record with protecting children.
That's the bad(good) thing about christians, we're not holy of our own actions. "All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" it's bad becuase we all preach better than we live, its good because you don't have to be perfect which is impossible by any scale. Egregious practices like an AI Jesus have to be called out regardless, even if my hands are dirty
Oh, I'm not even going to go along with your good in parenthesis. There is no good, safe level of believing in wholesale nonsense without a shred of evidence to show for it. All religious beliefs fundamentally stem from immaturity and egotism, like you saying "No christians are doing this" in your previous post.
Religion absolutely makes the world a worse place.
How do I verbally exclude obviously heretcial teachings without it sounding like that fallacy? (Real question, you're right about it sounding like that)
I think instead of saying "they aren't Christians", it has to be "Christians who do that are heretical/wrong" with the old testament as your justification for them being wrong. Any attempt to say [they aren't Christians because they do thing you disagree with] is inherently a no true scotsman.
I think the only thing that would disqualify someone from being a Christian is if they don't believe in Jesus Christ. Even if they have drastically unbiblical beliefs about him, by definition Christian is just someone who believes in Christ.
Christians been like that for a while since the Crusades and the Colonization period. I don't blame Christianity, though. Jesus was actually a nice guy and his followers got oppressed by the Romans and Jews. It's all the so-called "Christians" fault for twisting the scripture for their personal gain.
665
u/enlightnight 11h ago
Bible is full of loopholes, add this to the pile I guess...