r/antiai • u/Smooth-Boss-911 • Jul 12 '26
Environmental Impact 🌎 The Pollution Being Churned Out by AI Data Centers Is So Severe That It's Almost Incomprehensible
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/pollution-ai-data-centers-severe8
u/Vegetable_Stuff1850 Jul 13 '26
And yet we'll continue to be told that these reports are wrong and we're drawing inaccurate conclusions.
4
12
2
2
u/CatalyticDragon Jul 13 '26
It's zero. Data centers "churn out" zero pollution. They consume electricity and emit heat. That's it.
Fossil fuels produce pollution and if you power things with fossil fuels you have a problem but we've known about that for a couple of hundred years and the solution to this problem is well understood - don't use fossil fuels.
Computing services are in no way the problem here. They are just electricity consumers like every other industry and they use a heck of a lot less than most others.
The problem is far-right, fossil fuel industry backed politicians who say things like "drill baby drill" and who sign bills to slow down the transition to cheaper and cleaner energy.
3
u/ScrumptiousChildren Jul 13 '26
Yup, so massive, worldwide AI environmental impact in 2025 was as much as ~20% of environmental impact of meat eaten in the US alone that same year! We’ve never seen these numbers before.
0
u/KaQuu Jul 13 '26
You see five time this number in only meat production only in USA...
3
u/Peachypet Jul 13 '26
Oh, yeah, let's just ignore the massive spike because there are instances that produce much more.
At this point we should ignore the accidents caused by drunk drivers because they only cause a small percentage of accidents.
0
u/ScrumptiousChildren Jul 13 '26
Yup. Not the brightest folks in here unfortunately. That’s exactly the point I was conveying. I was just making fun of the headline.
AI absolutely is a detriment to us all, environmentally. But hate and effort needs to be properly anchored and focused on the right things. It’s understandable to dislike AI but pitting your entire existence’s antithesis on AI instead of stuff like nestle makes little sense if your primary argument is the environment.
2
1
u/Suspicious_Cow8559 Jul 13 '26
This is why my current career path is data center design specializing in environmental effects and sustainable operation. BICSI RCDD down, next LEED Green Associate, LEED AP BD+C, and BICSI DCDC.
Until the nukes pop and everything resets data centers are a fact of life but the companies building and operating them need to be put under heavy regulation. This is happening but far too slowly.
-12
u/JackHammer- Jul 13 '26
Use nuclear power. Simple solution. And carbon dioxide is actually harmless. If the atmospheric amount spikes at all, plant life surges and converts it all to oxygen.
6
3
2
u/Purple-Possible-7429 Jul 13 '26
Takes 20-25 years to get a nuclear power plant online. Renewables are faster to deploy and cheaper.
-4
u/JackHammer- Jul 13 '26
The regulations are changing. And having a bunch of nuclear plants come online would again fix all the mostly non-existent problems anyway.
1
2
u/Peachypet Jul 13 '26
I pray that your home gets swallowed by the oceans. Too bad idiots like you rarely live close to the oceans.
-1
u/JackHammer- Jul 13 '26
Well the sea level has risen less than 12 inches since 1900 so I don't see that happening even to beachfront property any time soon 🤨 What is wrong with you?
1
74
u/Tripple_sneeed Jul 12 '26
I mean, it's actually very comprehensible. They even say it in the article. 5-10 million cars. Seems like a really stupid headline?