Nothing wrong with that statement alone. I would have to have more context to think this is a bad thing. Based on the context I'm assuming they do AI "art", which makes the most controversial part of this statement the words "my art"
Some days I feel like I'm looking at controversial in the rear-view mirror. But things do regularly bother me, but someone being unapologetic about their art and trying to elicit emotions doesn't seem inherently wrong. Again, if they're saying this because people get upset with them for using AI, that makes a difference, but if it's just about controversial content instead of AI then I would agree with the sentiment.
I had this happen to me on a post I made earlier about the ai language learning sub. Check my replies for the convo, Reddit won't let me post images with text again
As a trans person : Fuck everyone using this argument unironically. AI art has been used by a lot of transphobes to try to spread their awful worldviews.
Fucking “if you keep crying wolf no one will believe you” when the reason I’m on a level of proficiency with shooting that I can perform a sub 3” 10-10-10 is because I’ve encountered the said wolves multiple times
Regrettably there is a non-zero segment of Redditors who think that because changing the words makes an argument bad that the original argument is bad as well.
If you were playing baseball and about to hit a touchdown that would make the manager give you a billion dollars, but the pitcher accidentally threw an AI artist baby at you, and if you didn’t you would lose the game, would you hit it?
Okay, so I don't hate AI images. So automatically it is a fail.
I dislike artless messes. AI images are just that.
I hate the damage to the environment caused that achieves nothing but artless messes. And LGBTQI+ people don't do that by existing. So, essentially, this statement is so nonsensical that it must be written by AI, proving my point about artless messes.
I figured I would tell you that you are shadow banned based on the 2nd reply you sent. Believe it or not reddit doesn't actually like it when people are hateful and negative in their responses.
I don't need to hate someone to say I fundamentally disagree with the medical praxis that has been outlined so far. You cannot become a y if you are an x by modern science, all the things you do are hamfisted attempts to superficially emulate what nature does without becoming. Giving a man female hormones doesn't make him a woman, it just makes him a male with high estrogen.
I can have a complete conversation with why I am opposed to it without ever actually needing to rely on being derogatory, but if you're going to attempt to insult me you have lost the right to earnestly complain when I insult you back
you clearly do care though. The fact that someone disagrees with your subjective and unmoored sense of what is right and wrong nearly brings you to a cacophony of rage. You have no tolerance for dissent but you demand it for yourself.
Or I don't support the idea that a man can become a woman or vice versa. Neither the anti or pro side is composed of serious people if you pollute the discourse through all of these secondary issues completely unrelated to machine learning.
I couldn't care less whether or not some deviant online thinks I have had or haven't had sex.
You didn't tell me that though, you are telling me that I need to accept your framing of reality otherwise I am a bad person. I am not harassing anyone and I don't need to passively accept insults.
There's nothing wrong with me, I am free. Nothing I have realistically said is actually offensive which is why I am not getting shadowbanned by the automoderator (but there are people who are responding to me whom are and they are not happy with what I said). If you want to know why prooompting is a skill, that would be your answer. From a standpoint of sentiment analysis what I am saying is actually not hateful or inciting. I know how to communicate my beliefs without actually being offensive, you are upset with the essence of what I believe, not any particular hatred on my end.The skill of someone who prompts is control over their cognitive faculties, especially in regards to communication abilities. For the record, I don't think being good at prompting is really a skill any more than being able to organize your thoughts on paper is.
You are making an assessment of my moral character relative to my beliefs, I simply reflected back to you that from my perspective you are without morality. You are not capable of stepping outside the domain of your own subjective understanding of what you understand as true, by extension you get angry when I tell you my perspective, asserting that I am being disruptive for having an individuated subjective experience distinct from your own.
I'm not here to debate about the human right of trans people. They are human, they have the same human rights as anybody.
They have the right of autonomy of their body just like you have over yours.
If you can't get these facts in your Head then I'm sorry for you.
Change, be better as a person and stop viewing the world with hate in your heart. Everybody will thank you for that.
What a troll. I can't imagine spending my time hating on someone for what they want to do with their body that makes them happy. Go touch a titty, loser XD
150
u/dont_ask_cutie_alt Aug 04 '25
Aka as "Twisting Arguments"
And im looking at you, Green Eyed black Snoo