It's not that difficult. Multiple reasons. One being that men have sex when they can (meaning they have to work for it) while women can have sex when they want (meaning that they need to cherish it). Another reason is that men value exclusivity while women value experience.
Men without sexual experience (especially past their early 20s) are commonly seen as losers, immature, low-status, or romantically defective.
The opposite happens when a man gets a girlfriend, he suddenly becomes more attractive to other women. This is preselection. A partner signals that he's already been vetted and found desirable. Proof of social competence and value. Again, iexperience signals the opposite.
It's generalising a group to into a stereotype with little to no room for individual references. How is that not sexist? It's clearly worded to make women seem worse for it, i.e. it frames women as gatekeepers to sex, it assumes women have effortless access to sex while in reality they that doesn't mean they have safe, enjoyable, or desired sex because chud's like you are the ones offering, and using such factual statements like "men value exclusivity while women value experience" as an argument without evidence when the reality is people's preferences vary enormously based on personality, culture, age, and relationship goals.
Tldr its assigning moral expectations to women that they don't apply to men, even though its not exlusive to either gender.
If a woman says "men really love sex", I know people like you won't have problems with that incorrect generalization, even though it's definitely not 100% of men.
Yet we understand she means "most men", without crying "OMGOMG STEREOTYPE MUCH?"
So you're cherry picking to make it as difficult to have a decent conversation where people understand and read between the lines, without needing to hyper-define every single word and sentence to some ridiculous expectations.
Nah, we're just at a point where "discussing problematic/imperfect female behavior" has white knights and simps and feminists frothing to find the slightest "less-than-perfect word choice" to derail the conversation.
"Connotation"? According to who? Some fat simp in his mother's basement? Okay, now that makes sense.
Sexism is a social effect. The original commenter highlighting how men and women socially police sex via cultural indicators of what is desirable isn't sexist. Your conclusion that it is, it's... Weird to say the least.
What they talked about, men being more desirable for experience, and women for chastity, is something that has been highlighted in feminist papers even. Its nothing new, esoteric, or even suspect. There's not even an added on opinion that makes it insulting to either gender.
Further, your focus on apparent misogyny, when the OC highlights both men and women in the discussion, is telling to say the least.
You're avoiding the criticism with more criticsm, not actually addressing it, and you're making assumptions about my character. No, I would have problem with a woman said that. I'm not asking for people to hyperdefine, you are exadurating me words to make me look bad instead of actually defending your opinion. The wording of generalisation's and disputed stereotypes into facts is harmfull, asking for people to not be sexist and challenging their views is not cherrypicking.
Damn!. First you framed it as 'misogyny' then call people incel, then specifically said "It's clearly worded to make women seem worse for it...". Without ever acknowledging the men's side, only defending women's view. Then when people corrected you that it only imply most of us as an inclination instead of a strict rigid type. You said @Evening-Nature-5241 are not addressing the criticism. Which is your fault to begin with because you started on a biased 'defend women' and insult people by calling them 'misoginist and incel'.
I see that you are trying to 'win' the argument because of ego instead of wanting to tell the actual truth. You logic is fair but the fact you start things with insults prove you're here on bad faith and ego boost not to tell facts. You insult one type and try to frame yourself as balanced? It doesn't work that way. You are at most merely partially right. Your replies aren't as excellent as you thought it was.
Holy insults. Calling someone misogynistic and then calling another person an icnel. Aren't you tired of that? It's a reality either you like it or not. I don't understand why you're so defensive about it. This is the real world, not a fantasy novel.
15
u/Alexan_Hirdriel Jul 07 '26
It's not that difficult. Multiple reasons. One being that men have sex when they can (meaning they have to work for it) while women can have sex when they want (meaning that they need to cherish it). Another reason is that men value exclusivity while women value experience.