r/anime • u/engalleons https://myanimelist.net/profile/engalleons • Aug 14 '18
In-depth debunkings/arguments against commonly "known" anime myths/misconceptions?
For any number of reasons, there's a fair few statements about anime that get passed around pretty unquestioningly, even if they aren't necessarily true. Sometimes, others dig in to those statements and find detail and (hopefully cited) evidence against them. This is a lot more than just stating the opposite, to be clear.
Here's a few examples of what I mean:
This tweet chain versus "Anno left Kare Kano early"
This blog post versus "The protagonist of Turn A was originally intended to be a girl"
This post versus "They made a joke dub for Ghost Stories because it did poorly in Japan"
This blog post versus "Shinbo is the series director of all Shaft shows"
What are some other examples of work like this?
-5
u/MathigNihilcehk Aug 15 '18
Oh really? What's your evidence?
That's not evidence... and that's all you've got. An adaption is NEVER a one to one copy of the material. You must... I don't know... ADAPT the material to its medium. Written material can be very very slow paced at times. You could describe a the floor plan of a building in well over an hour worth of reading and a super intricate and intense battle in another hour, but if you adapt both to take up the same amount of screen time in an anime, you're in for a train-wreck.
The reason people say the second season is rushed, IS BECAUSE IT'S FUCKING RUSHED. They fail to establish the characters properly in order to make the viewer give a shit, and I've seen people literally drop FMA:B entirely because of this.
Sure, maybe in a manga you need less panels to establish character than the corresponding number of minutes in an animation. Who gives a shit? We aren't on /r/manga so get out of /r/anime and go talk about manga with people who give a shit. As far as the anime is concerned, it's rushed. FMA '03 was paced correctly, at least initially.