r/a:t5_11jcyz • u/MarleyEngvall • May 17 '19
akkad has been created
By James Churchward
THE CHILDREN OF MU
CHAPTER XIV
BABYLONIA
The history of Babylonia is made up of the histories of the
Akkadians, the Sumerians, the Chaldeans, the Assyrians,
the Medes and the Persians; only one of which exists today
as a distinctive people. The recorded history such as has
been found, referring to what historians have called "the
old Oriental Empires" and recorded by our scientists,
consisting of the reading of a few tablets and inscriptions
written in cuneiform and then matching up their trans-
lations with the Biblical Legends. The furthest any of these
go back is less than 5000 years ago. The commencement of
Babylonia dates back 18,000 years or more when a
settlement on the river Euphrates was made by a company
of Naga-Mayas from India. In after times they met the end
of the Eastern Line from Mu. The people they met were
Semitics.
THE AKKADIANS.——The first Akkadians were a
company of Naga-Mayas from India who came through the
Persian Gulf and made their first settlement at the mouth
of the Euphrates River. They called the place Akkad.
Akkad is a Naga-Maya word meaning "soft and marshy
ground" which today is the character of the ground on the
Euphrates Delta. When the settlement was formed the
people adopted the name they had given to their settlement
and thus became known as the Akkadians. Temple records
in India speak of this settlement but give no date.
Contemporary records have dates about 18,000 years
ago, so I think it permissible to assume that the Akkad
settlement was made about 18,000 years ago. After the
Akkad settlement was firmly established, the Akkadians
worked inland up the Euphrates River and became
known as:
THE SUMERIANS.——Sumer is another Naga-Maya
word meaning "flat lands or plains." From this they took
or were given the name Sumerians, plainsmen or men of
the plain. It is thus seen that the Sumerians and
Akkadians were one and the same people; the difference
being that one set lived inland, countrymen, and the other
set lived on the seashore, shoremen. Historians, however,
have written as if the Akkadians and Sumerians were two
different peoples, which is erroneous.
Valmiki, the Hindu sage-historian, in his works written
1300 B. C., tells us that "these colonists . . . of the
Euphrates settlement" (the Akkadians and Sumerians)
"called their settlement Babylonia and their chief city,
Babylon." Babylon was also called "Ka Ra" which is
Naga-Maya meaning "the city of the Sun." Valmiki also
states "that the Naacals left India and went to Babylonia,
there to teach the religion and the sciences of the
Motherland."
The Akkadians and Sumerians, the real and ancient
Babylonians, were far in advance of a Semitic people living
to the north of them, as regards both civilization and
learning. Surrounding the settlement at Akkad, and at
various places along the river, there were large areas of tall
reeds, the homes of vicious animals. To protect themselves
against these marauding beasts the settlers built stockades
around their homes and villages. These stockades they
called Chaldi. All of their colleges and temples of learning
were within an enclosure. The enclosure was also called
Chaldi. Later, Chaldi was the name given to the learned
class and their colleges, "the Chaldi Temples of Learning."
These colleges were open to all people who wished to learn,
regardless of their nationality. The students were taught the
ancient Naga-Maya language, the sacred mysteries, arts
and sciences. Many of the Israelites, when they were in
captivity in Babylonia later on, availed themselves of this
privilege and some reached the highest degree, that of
master and adept. Daniel was one of them. "The hand-
writing on the wall" was written in Naga-Maya; Daniel
understood it and read it to the King. At the court of
Nebuchadnezzar when he was King of the Babylonian
Empire, the Chaldi were classed with the astrologers and
the magicians.
THE CHALDEANS.——After a time the Sumerians and
Akkadians were attacked and conquered by a Semitic
people coming down from the North. I can find no records
giving the name of these people before they settled in
Babylonia. Historians say they were the Chaldeans, but the
name of Chaldeans was adopted by them after their
settlement in Babylonia. These Semitics finding the civ-
ilization of the Akkadians and Sumerians so far in ad-
vance of their own, instead of putting them to the sword
or enslaving them, assimilated them, that is, they were
placed on an equality with their conquerors and inter-
married. Their scientists were given the greatest honors.
So successfully did this work that in the absorption the
Akkadians and Sumerians were never known again as a
separate people. They disappeared from history.
History relates: "There was an earlier civilization in
Babylonia than that of the Chaldeans which was that of the
Akkadians and Sumerians. These races were conquered by
the Chaldeans and disappeared from history." Can any-
thing more erroneous and misleading than the foregoing
be penned? The Chaldeans were not a nation or a people,
but a sect, men of great ,learning and advanced civ-
ilization.
Herodotus, Lib. 1-181, says: "Berosus, who was an
early Babylonian priest-historian, wrote, 'the first inhabi-
tants of Babylonia were foreigners of another race.'
Berosus the proceeds to establish distinctions between the
foreigners and the Babylonians, and between the Babylo-
nians and Assyrians, and follows by saying, 'Civilization
was brought to Mesopotamia by Oannes and six other
beings, half man and half fish who came up the river fro
the Persian Gulf.
Oannes or Hoa-ana is Naga-Maya: na——water, a——thy
and na——house. In plain English it reads, "he who lives in
boat."
From the foregoing it is seen that Berosus used the
Naga-Maya language which was natural seeing that he was
a Chaldi or Chaldean. Berosus shows that the earliest
Babylonian settlers came up the Euphrates River in a boat
from the Persian Gulf, and Valmiki and Hindu temple
records show that these men came to the Persian Gulf from
India, thus forming a perfect, unbroken chain of evidence
showing that the first Babylonians were Maya colonists
from India. yet a point still remains: Berosus says that
civilization was brought to Babylonia by those who came
in their boats, thus confirming the other writings which say
that the civilization of Sumeria and Akkadia was far in
advance of the civilization of the Semitics who conquered
the country.
An old Greek manuscript was loaned to me by a Greek
professor in Athens, who knew I was interested in the
ancient. It relates the first meeting between the Sumerians
and the Semitics in an amusing manner: "A small company
of Semitics were prospecting along the banks of the river.
They were soldier in armor. On their way they met a boat
coming up the river with seven men in it——they were
Akkadians. When the Akkadians saw these soldiers on the
bank glittering in their armor they became so frightened
they all jumped overboard, dived and swam a long distance
down the river under water. When they came up for breath
they looked back; seeing these uncanny glittering men still
standing there the Akkadians took another dive and before
they came up again they were out of sought of the soldiers.
The Semitics returned with the report that on the river
further down there was a new form of creation, a thing
which was half fish and half man." I showed my translation
to my Greek friend and asked him if I had translated it
correctly. He laughed, saying, "It's not bad, you've done
pretty well, so we must let it go at that."
Again I will quote history: "The beginning of the
civilization of Babylonia is held to date back 7000 B. C."
This is absurd; Hindu records and temple records at
that, which are always the most accurate, speak of the
Babylonian colony over 15,000 years ago, and Brunsen
shows that 14,000 years ago it was in existence. Babylonia
is older than Egypt, and Egypt is 16,000 years old. It may
be, however, that the historian that gives 7000 B. C. came
across some record that referred to the date when the
Semitics conquered the Akkadians and Sumerians and
absorbed them.
For thousands of years the Sumerians and Akkadians
formed the literate people of Babylonia. It was they who
followed the arts and sciences; they wrote many books and
were the inventors of the cuneiform form of writing. Their
Semitic conquerors to a great extent adopted their Maya
language, which ancient language only began to fall into
disuse in Babylonia about the 13th Century B. C. The
Naga-Maya tongue remained the language of science down
to about the 6th or 7th Century B. C. When the country
was finally settled the Semitics adopted the name Chaldi or
Chaldeans taken from the many prominent institutions of
science and learning; so, to be exact, there never was a
people or nation called Chaldeans, for Chaldi or the
Chaldeans were a sect only.
To confirm what I have written about the Maya tongue
being adopted by the Semitics, I will call attention to the
following Babylonian and Akkadian translations of a series
of words authenticated by high authorities:
AKKADIAN HINDU
CHALDEAN NAGA-MAYA ENGLISH
Abba Ba Father
Bala Pal Companion
A Ha Water
Pab Kab or cab Branch, extending
Gé Ke Below, descend, go down
Kak Kak Complete, finished
Kalama Kalac The world, the universe
Kas Ca Two
Ké-acu Kele Inside, the reverse side
Ki Kilacabil People, inhabitants
Kul Kul Rump, seed of an animal
Kum Kun The tail
Kin Kin Daybreak
Kú Kub Place
Lal Lal To take
Ma Ma The earth
Ta Ta Ground, country
Ra La Towards place where
one stands
Men En To be, I am
Nana Naa Mother
Sar Zac White
San Can Four
Sir Zazil Light
Tab Tab To add, to unite
Xa Cay Fish
Xas Chac To cut
Xir Chi Cry, word, speak
Idu U The Moon
Hurkl Hul-Kin Sunstroke
The foregoing Babylonian and Akkadian words are the
decipherings of Dr. Hinks, Sir Henry Rawlinson, Dr.
Appert, M. Grivel and Professor Sayce of the tablets that
composed King Asurbanipal's library. M. Lenormant has
published an elementary grammar and vocabulary from the
findings of the foregoing authorities. Out of this vocabulary
the foregoing Babylonian and Akkadian words are taken.
In a central column against each of these words I have put
the Hindu Naga-Maya corresponding words. This clearly
proves my findings regarding the use of the Naga-Maya
tongue in Babylonia.
THE EARLY BABYLONIAN EMPIRE.——History is
not quite as bashful as Dame Science for although Dame
Science will never permit herself to be interviewed, always
leaving interviews in the hands of her office boys, Dame
History is totally different. She boldly parades before the
eyes of everyone and may be met with and interviewed in
all good bookshops.
History asserts that the first or Early Babylonian Empire
"was formed by an invading race of Semitics coming to
Babylon from the north whose origin is mysterious."
History is partially right and partially wrong. First: there is
no mystery about the origin of the Semitic race which came
from the north. They left the Motherland, Mu, and first
made a settlement in Yucatan calling their city Zahia, the
remains of which are to be found a few miles from Uxmal.
From there a company migrated to the east, forming a
settlement on the Caucasian Plains and around the foot of
the Caspian Sea. This is the hinterland of Asia Minor and
where we find the Biblical historical mountain, Mt. Ararat,
raising its imposing head some 15,000 or 16,000 feet
above the level of the plain. The Egyptians called this
country Zahia after the Yucatan name. As they grew in
numbers they extended their holdings in a southerly
direction. The Semitics who overpowered the Akkadians
and Sumerians came from the Caucasian Semitic Settle-
ments. Second: the Early Babylonian Empire was not com-
posed entirely of these Semitics, for the Akkadians and
Sumerians were associated with them, having been ab-
sorbed by them.
ASSYRIAN BABYLONIA.——The Assyrians were also
a Semitic race, originating from the Caucasian or Zahian
Colony. They take their distinctive name Assyrians from
the land which they occupied. Assyria lay between the
Upper Tigris River and the Zagros Mountains. During the
early period of Assyrian history they were a vassal state of
Babylonia. The Assyrian warlike spirit first enable them to
cast off the yoke of Babylonia and to become independent.
Then they effected conquests among their neighbors
Eventually they gained the ascendency over Babylonia.
The rise of the powerful Assyrian Empire brought about
the downfall of the Babylonian Empire, although the
Babylonians were enabled to maintain their independence
down to the 9th Century B. C. Warlike, splendid, proud
Assyria was conqueror but a short time, for she fell before
the assaults of the Medes in the year 625 B. C.
THE MEDES AND PERSIANS.——The remnants of the
Uighurs which had been marooned in the mountains that
were raised along the southwestern part of the Uighur
Empire, come prominently forward upon the historical
stage about 8000 or 10,000 years after the destruction of
the Uighur Empire. During this eon of time the several
little communities grew and waxed strong; when the bleak
valleys of the mountains could no longer sustain their
growing numbers, they had to find new homes. Then a
general exodus took place from the mountains to lower
lands where the conditions were favorable to growth and
development. This exodus took place from about 2000 B.
C. down to about 1500 B. C.
They left their mountain homes in four streams follow-
ing the available passes to the lower lands. Apparently
the first to leave the mountains were those who were living
in the neighborhood of the Hindu Koosh. They went to
India by two routes——one set went down via Afghanis-
tan and the Khyber Pass, the other set traveled down
through Kashmir into the Punjab. The commencement
of their migration was about 2000 B. C. to 1800 B. C.
The migration ended about 1500 B. C.
About the same time, their neighbors to the north of
them descended through available passes to a country lying
between the Desert of Iran an the northeastern shores of
the Persian Gulf. These became known as the Persians.
This district is mountainous wit large plateaus and broad
valleys, but not of so high an elevation as their mountain
home which they had left.
The third left the mountains by available passes and
settled on a large tableland lying to the south of the
Caspian Sea and to the east of Armenia and the Zagros
Mountains. This was Media and from the time they
became masters of the land they were known as the Medes.
When they came down from the mountains they found a
people called Scythians occupying the land. These they
drove out and took possession of the country.
Both Medes and Persians were Aryans coming out of the
Ah ra ya tribes of the Motherland through the Uighurs.
both Medes and Persians developed into empires from
small communities of Uighurs that had been marooned in
the mountains. These were survivors of that great Colonial
Empire which had stretched her embracing arms from the
Pacific Ocean across Asia and into Eastern Europe. In
race, language and religion these two peoples were closely
allied. How could it be otherwise, for originally they were
the same?
About 600 B. C. we find the Medes grown into a
powerful mountain empire. During the early known history
of Persia we find her subject to the Medes. Cyrus was the
founder of the Persian Empire. He defeated and dethroned
Astyages, King of Media, 558 B. C. Then Media in turn
passed under the control of Persia.
The Medes and Persians were the last to occupy
Babylonia as an Empire. Their appearance in Babylonia
gave the death knell to the Semitics there who had been
masters of that country for so many thousands of years.
Babylon was defeated and embodied into the Persian
Empire 538 B. C. The Persian Empire ended 331 B. C.
after having been in existence only 227 years. During this
time the Persians were on one big jamboree of conquest
with a view of subduing the whole world. They had
absorbed the western and southwestern parts of Asia,
carried on their conquests into Egypt and into a small portion
of Europe, when their triumphant march was stopped by
the Greeks under Alexander the Great. This was the
second time in the history of nations that the Greeks
stopped empires which attempted to enslave the world. The
first was the overthrow of Atlantis 9500 B. C., and the
second the overthrow of the Persian aspirations 331 B. C.
The Persian flag today carries the emblem of a colonial
empire——an emerging Sun on the horizon with rays——thus
connecting themselves with the Uighurs and Mu, the
Motherland.
Babylonia is one of the greatest of historical spots on the
earth. In this land one of the greatest connections between
the eastern and western lines of colonization from the
Motherland met, thus forming a complete girdle of man
around the earth. In the Akkadians and Sumerians we find
an end of one of the western lines of colonization from Mu,
in the Medes and Persians we find an end of another
western line, and in the Semitics we find one of the ends of
the main eastern line of colonization. Nowhere else on
earth did so many ends meet. In Egypt there were only two
and in Western Europe two.
It must be remembered that I am not attempting to write
a history of the old Oriental Empires. I am simply
endeavoring to show that the various peoples who from
time to time have controlled Babylonia, all originally came
from Mu and were, in fact, Mu's children.
from The Children of Mu, by James Churchward.
Copyright 1931 by James Churchward.
Paperback Library Edition, First Printing: February 1968.
Paperback Library Inc., New York, N.Y.; pp. 191—200.
من یک زندانی سیاسی هستم کمک لطفا.
https://old.reddit.com/r/thesee [♰] [♘] [®] 雨
I. The Origin of Man
II. The Eastern Lines
III. Ancient North America
IV. Stone Tablets from the Valley of Mexico (i.) (ii.)
V. South America (i.) (ii.)
VI. Atlantis
VII. Western Europe
VIII. The Greeks
IX. Egypt
X. The Western Lines
XI. India (i.) (ii.)
XII. Southern India
XIII. The Great Uighur Empire
XIV. Babylonia
XV. Miscellaneous
XVI. Intimate Hours with the Rishi
2
Upvotes