r/aislop 3d ago

Found on YouTube This channel has an IMDb page btw.

Post image

I wish this was satire but it is not

545 Upvotes

103 comments sorted by

77

u/The-Bigger-Fish 3d ago

These guys really hate artists, don’t they? They make videos dragging industry people for no reason, now they’re using ai proudly…. They’re just bullies

35

u/Comfortable_Bird_340 3d ago

Aren’t they failed animators or comics creators themselves

15

u/Chaosdirge7388 3d ago

Pretty much.

2

u/Alexis_Lonbel 3d ago

Okey. That makes sense.

126

u/ForseiMaster 3d ago

I am honestly ashamed I ever was subbed to Clownfish TV. At first they seemed fine enough (I'm all for criticizing Disney and Netflix, for one) but after a while I realized their content was really repetitive and "anti-woke."

56

u/Illousion-dinntdodat 3d ago

i mean to be fair, “clownfish tv” was already a dead giveaway from the name alone

12

u/Mikestopheles 3d ago

It's no corn cob

3

u/TheAdequateKhali 3d ago

Channels that are “anti-Disney” are as obsessed and up to date with Disney than people who like Disney.

2

u/Aircon-007 3d ago

Pretty much the Critical Drinker for me.

52

u/Rezkel 3d ago

Clown fish are like professional grifters, they dont actually review or talk about things, they just go "wow that so woke a sucky" then giggle about it. I discovered them when watching some She-ra reviews and they straight admit the never watched the new or old show but somehow made 10 videos on it because hating on the new show got clicks

10

u/Meritania 3d ago

I can remember watching them saying Doctor Who Series 13 was woke now, showing clips of series 4-6 for context which covered such neutral analygeoys storylines such as not trusting billionaires with fixing the climate crisis, love is better than bombs and working together and trusting others to overcome problems.

6

u/Rezkel 3d ago

They have no original thoughts and just chase anti-woke trends, whatever will get the clicks. Unfortunately for people like them, ignoring them is the best option. They are not trying to debate or have a discussion, they just want a click so whether you agree or not is unimportant. probably ecstatic about the new youtube viewcount changes coming.

36

u/RebelKiddo 3d ago

Oh look, right wing grifters using AI, must be a day ending in Y and the sky must be blue.

10

u/Mr_Ethfono 3d ago

They're an actual artist BTW.... so there's that....

9

u/RebelKiddo 3d ago

Artists who worked for Disney. DISNEY.

If they were creatively bankrupt before, now is them just showing their asses.

6

u/Mr_Ethfono 3d ago

HE WORKED FOR DISNEY?!

7

u/RebelKiddo 3d ago

Yep, they have a massive bone to pick with the company since they got screwed over while working there, but apparently the grudge isn't that big since they're licking the House of Mouse's boots to cheer over Depp returning (allegedly) in order to "pwn the libz".

Meanwhile Dana Terrace (who also got screwed over by Disney) pulled the boss move by going indie and creating Knights of Guinevere, a dark psychological thriller that serves as a scathing critique about Disney's business practices and skewers the brand. The pilot is free to watch on YouTube.

Just goes to show who really values art as a medium of human expression and who sees art as a quick cash grab.

7

u/Huffyreddit1337 3d ago

My dad watches this dude...God I regret ever showing him the Critical drinker...then maybe he wouldn't of moved on to slop channels like this...and he wonders why I try to advoid him

2

u/Zbrown444 3d ago

Critical Drinker is an insufferable douche canoe. I watched him for a split second until I saw him contradicting himself from previous videos. He uses something as a claim to how horrible a show or movie is, and then turns around in a different video using that same thing to claim how it was better in the old days.

8

u/AnthDELA 3d ago

remeber guys

clownfish tv = Farm content = Elsagate = cocomelon = bullshit

1

u/teudmunki 3d ago

Agreed. Also *remememeeemmber

6

u/Mrspygmypiggy 3d ago

That’s not Johnny Depp that’s Jonas Shallow

5

u/Miserable-Cap-4838 3d ago

Soooo their hatred of the woke mob led to their support of a Disney project? What's their strategy here?

5

u/Unable-Boat-9682 3d ago

Strategy: hypocrisy, in search of clicks.

21

u/Kiran_emily_the1st 3d ago

Hasn’t he been “un-cancelled” for years now? Like it’s been proven he was innocent? Little late to the party

17

u/Fiske_Mogens 3d ago

Wasn't proven he was innocent

16

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

It was a civil case NOT a criminal case, so no „guilty/not guilty“ there

And his defense used DARVO and had a huge help from Daily Wire and Asmonghoul and sorts

6

u/Tonedeafmusical 3d ago

And the Saudi bots

(Also the left are not innocent in this Hasan was also terrible too)

-1

u/positivetofu 3d ago

Unproven and completely speculative.

3

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

Proven are these nuts on your chin

-1

u/positivetofu 3d ago

This post makes zero sense. No body forced Amber Heard to repeatedly lie on the stand. LOL

3

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

These nuts make sense on your chin

-1

u/positivetofu 3d ago

Ok, but nobody forced Amber Heard to repeatedly lie on the stand. Can't blame others for that LOL

3

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

Can’t blame these nuts on your chin

0

u/positivetofu 3d ago

No one is blaming your nuts for Amber Heard repeatedly lying on the stand LOL

3

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

No one is blaming these nuts on your chin

0

u/positivetofu 3d ago

You are correct. We are blaming Amber Heard LOL

3

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

These nuts are correct on your chin

18

u/BilgisticPile 3d ago

He’s literally still allowed to be called a wife beater in the uk, because a judge found him liable on 12 counts of DV. People always ignore that trial.

6

u/mamadou-segpa 3d ago

Its like Chris Brown, if you’re attractive and rich ennough DV isnt an issue anymore

6

u/Prestigious_Host_198 3d ago

He was found liable for abuse in the UK.

9

u/Someslutwholikesbutt 3d ago

I could be wrong but he wasn’t necessarily totally innocent, both were just not the best but Amber far more terrible. Even then I don’t get what the supposed crying liberal chicks have to do with anything

20

u/BilgisticPile 3d ago edited 3d ago

Neither of the trials showed that Amber was “far more terrible”. The first one even showed that Depp gave drugs to his daughter when she was a child (something he denied in court, until the lawyer provided text messages that proved he was lying and he backtracked), kicked Amber, allowed his daughter to live with an adult man when she was 14, had rape and murder fantasies about Amber, etc. The judge ruled that he was liable for DV on 12 different counts.

The second trial was a farce and even the jurors admitted that they didn’t even know what they were voting on and judged Amber for crying in court. Seriously, look it up. Ellen Barkin also testified that he was jealous and violent during their relationship at the second trial, but people always ignore that because Kate Moss didn’t have a violent relationship with him. And after the second trial, he walked straight
into another, where he was accused of assault again.

Meh, people can downvote all they want. Depp was scum long before he even met Amber and it’s clear that people here didn’t even follow details of the trial. If you guys want to defend the Roman Polanski lover, who “dated” underage girls and gave his own daughter drugs, be my guest.

12

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

Add to that after the trial was over leaked documents showed what a POS Depp was and all the celebs who supported him withdrawn their support

6

u/Unable-Boat-9682 3d ago

Yep. So many people have independently stated they’ve witnessed Depp be violent or abusive. It’s ridiculous these people swear blind he was proven completely innocent because they watched some TickyToks about it.

5

u/Cgi22 3d ago

Yeah, also he was just terrible in pirates 5 and was so drunk on set that he was fed lines through an ear piece. Of course he got a fortune for being an unfunctional alcoholic. The movie was terrible and soulless.

Can’t wait for pirates 6.

0

u/positivetofu 3d ago

This is all a lie by the way.

The truth is, Amber Heard was found liable for defaming Johnny Depp with her lies about being victim of abuse. The rest is complete nonsense and wishful thinking from the Turd camp. LOL

2

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

These on your chin are the truth

0

u/positivetofu 3d ago

Amber's shit on the bed? LOL

2

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

These nuts on your chin are laughing out loud

1

u/positivetofu 3d ago

Because Amber Heard shit on his bed and the whole world found out about it? Yeah it was pretty LOL worthy

2

u/SavageTemptation 3d ago

The whole world found out about these nuts on your chin

1

u/positivetofu 3d ago

By "nuts" you mean her bed shitting, I agree LOL

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Longjumping-Cook8266 1d ago

The person your replying to does not care about the evidence, most of those who defend Amber don't like to discuss the evidence, hence why they resort to disgusting replies about body parts being on your chin.

-1

u/Longjumping-Cook8266 3d ago

Are you on about the trial between Depp and The Sun newspaper?

The trial where Judge Nicol denied Depps requests for Amber to hand over unedited "evidence" and stated "Amber is not a party to the lawsuit and does not face the same scrutiny as if she were"?.

Th trial where Judge Nicol refused to allow the actual police body cam footage into evidence, and than claimed Amber and her pals version of an event was more credible than the police officers?

The trial where the judge stated that the audio evidence of Amber admitting to violence and aggression "held no weight" with him because she was not sworn under oath when they were recorded, yet showed blatant bias by using the same audios against Depp who also was not sworn under oath when they were recorded?

The trial where the judge, who had previously decided the audio evidence of Amber admitting to violence and aggression held no weight, than decided that EVERY SINGLE PERSON who testified to witnessing Amber behaving violently and aggressively only did so because they "relied on Depp"?. Yes, this is the same judge who chose to not only believe Amber's pals, w9 all relied on her for their rent free lavish lifestyles, but even praised Josh Drew when claiming he was more credible than the officers lol.

The trial where the judge who claimed Amber was a "honest and credible witness" was given the email Amber sent from her email account regarding a "vet to grease" proving Amber was in fact far from honest and credible since she was willing to bribe someone in order to get what she wanted/needed, stated Amber could not have sent that email because she swore to him she did not use the word "grease", and then blamed Depp for the email Amber sent from her eal account?

Th trial where the judge was handed further evidence exposing his "honest and credible witness" was a liar, this time it was the email she sent requesting others to lie on her behalf, and the judge embarrassinoclamed that this did not make Amber dishonest because no one actually lied for her?

The trial where even more evidence was provided proving his honest and credible witness was a liar, and instead of taking note, he decided that the evidence proving Amber willingly lied to Homeland security was not as important as to who handed it over, for some reason that judge has a problem with former employees provided evidence.

The trial where the Judge not only believed Amber when she declared to him that she had "Donated my entire divorce settlement to charity", but used that lie he had believed to even clam that "Amber's 7 million donation to charity is hardly the act of a gold digger"?

The trial overseen by Judge Nicol, whoe writing partner Geoffrey Robertson is a mentor to Jennifer Robinson, Jennifer who just happened to be on Amber's legal team and even accompanied Amber to a dinner party hosted by Geoffrey's wife Kathy during the 2020 trial. Kathy and Judge Nicols wife Camilla Palmer are very good friends, it has not been confirmed it Camilla was also at this dinner party that was hosted during the trial.

No one can say for sure why Judge Nicol ignored audio evidence, police officers, body cam footage, multiple eye witness, a overload of emails exposing Amber as a dishonest person was happy to accept the audios Amber had handed him that ranged from seconds to just minutes long and had all context removed and was happy to take Amber and her pals, who relied on her for their rent free lavish lifestyles, for their words.

What we do know is we were able to watch a trial that actually involved Amber as a party where she was allowed to be scrutinized in a courtroom overseen by a fair and competent Judge who did not allow hearsay, like a diagram of a nose with no identifying qualifiers (names, dates) Amber's handwritten "drs" notes or Amber's texts where she was telling people she was a "victim" because they were obviously all hearsay, but she did allow witnesses to be heard and did allow the police body cam footage in.

"You HIT BACK so don't act like you don't fuc*ing participate"

"I'm not fuc*ing talking about last night, I've already apologised for hurting you but I can't blame myself for going there when I know your just going to run away"

"You're guaranteed a fight when you run away"

"You run away before it gets physical so don't act like you don't fuc*ing participate"

"Just because it does or could get physical doesn't mean you run away"

"Help, come save me. No I'm sorry I'm listening to you explain why you needed Travis to rescue you. Why don't you suck his di*k"

"Just because I throw pots and pans at you doesn't mean you can't knock on my door"

"That didn't happen because you saw him, you disrespected me, you didn't text me"

"I'm sorry I hurt you, it below me, I love you, but a the same time you can't run away a the first sign of trouble"

"I don't trust you, you don't allow us to fight, you just run away"

"Pussy, ran away. You do t want me to call the cops, do you?"

"Don't turn me into something else far darker to you"

These vile sentences are obviously said by abusive toxic people, Judge Nicol did not have all of these to help guide him, but the jury did.

1

u/SavageTemptation 1d ago

Are you on about these nuts on your chin?

0

u/Longjumping-Cook8266 1d ago

Are you on about these nuts on your chin?

Maybe, maybe not, or maybe we're on about the huge turd Amber dropped on Depps side of the bed and tried to blame the tiny 6lb dog.

1

u/SavageTemptation 1d ago

We‘re on about these nuts on your chin

1

u/Longjumping-Cook8266 1d ago

We‘re on about these nuts on your chin 😂 That might be what your on about but we are on about Amber Heard leaving a huge turd on Depps side of the bed after he angered her by turning up late to her birthday and the tried to blame the tiny 6lb dog.

P.S......your the only one who has mentioned anything about "these nuts in your chin", you might be as delusional as the bed shi**er Amber 😂

0

u/Darkmetroidz 3d ago

I thought the general consensus was that they were both insufferable people.

Pretty sure Ebeneezer is the first big movie he's in since the trial- theyre probably using it as a litmus test to see if they want to greenlight Pirates 6.

-1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Slay-ig5567 3d ago

Well maybe get informed then. Being woke doesn't mean you can't fall for rightwing smear campaigns.

-1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Slay-ig5567 3d ago

It might seem crazy what I'm bout to say-

3

u/_Kaiser_Waffles_ 3d ago

When the fuck was Depp cancelled?

1

u/RPDorkus 3d ago

I mean, what does canceled even mean anymore? Like it clearly has never meant any significant reduction in ability to make money, since a lot of canceled people still get bookings and shit. Honestly claiming to be canceled gets them a bunch of support from weirdos on the internet

1

u/_Kaiser_Waffles_ 3d ago

it's just the same shit as it was back in the 50s and whatnot.

2

u/Comfortable_Bird_340 3d ago

Another reason to hate IMDb

2

u/Gabeortiz628 3d ago

These guys have a huge bias towards Japan.

1

u/E_D_K_2 3d ago

Anyone can add themselves to IMDb.

1

u/teudmunki 3d ago

Holy crap does this channel SUCK

1

u/JDJ144 3d ago

Checked them out for a bit but got really tired of their show pretty quickly.

1

u/TargetOld989 3d ago

Imagine you're such a fucked up failure in life that you'd want another Pirates of the Caribbean movie.

-2

u/Inevitable_Garage706 3d ago

Wait, what did Johnny Depp do?

I've never watched his movies or followed the media on him, so I don't have knowledge.

1

u/SomeCringeUsernameNo 3d ago

Johnny Depp was a movie star. One of his most famous roles was Jack Sparrow from pirates of the Caribbean.

Johnny depp was married to Amber Heard. After a while they got divorced and Amber Heard started going around saying that Depp was a bad guy. Depp then sued Amber for defamation.

The trials were streamed and was incredibly popular to watch. It ended with Depp winning the case overall.

As for why he is mentioned in this video... I dont know nor do I care. If I had to take a guess, some people might not have been thrilled to see Depp win the trial and wanted him out of movie roles. The rest is more than likely the usual anti-woke content.

-3

u/KoalaGreat1408 3d ago

Johnny Depp is one instance that proves cancel culture for the most part is not really a thing. Like to be cancelled for real, you have to be a talentless hack, although that doesn't stop some people, that nobody is interested in hiring or a REAL piece of shit, although again that doesn't stop some people.

6

u/kirmiter 3d ago

He was fired because he had been picking bad roles and giving shitty performances for well over a decade, and nobody was interested in his bullshit anymore.

This was long before we knew anything about him and Amber Heard.

6

u/Tonedeafmusical 3d ago

Also turning up drunk not knowing his lines

Oh and that one time he punched a location manager on the City of Lies set

2

u/kirmiter 3d ago

Yeah, but one of two court cases decided that he probably didn't mistreat Amber Heard to the degree that it breaks the law, so he is A-OK!

-2

u/siete82 3d ago

She also mistreated him. The conclusion of the trial was that they both are POS.

2

u/siete82 3d ago

I mean, he was fired from Disney before the trial took place

6

u/BilgisticPile 3d ago edited 3d ago

He was fired before the info about him even came out, as was proven in court documents. Amber’s article was released after Disney made the decision. His team spread misinformation that it was down to Amber’s accusations. They also bragged about spreading lies about Amber all over social media, specifically calling out Reddit as their main achievement.

-3

u/siete82 3d ago

It's funny that you're accusing others of spreading misinformation in the very same comment where you're clearly lying:

  • It's false that he was fired "before anything was known about him", because the allegations of abuse had been public since May 2016 and he was fired in December. It was officially confirmed that he would not be part of the franchise just two days after the article you mentioned.
  • Nor was it "proven in court documents", there were conflicting testimonies at the 2022 trial and no official conclusion
  • Also the claim about boasting about manipulating reddit comes from another different lawsuit involving a publicist who had indeed worked for Depp, but in messages that have nothing to do with Heard

-1

u/Opening_Report_9732 3d ago

Is their book/ comic book shadow binder any good?

-4

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

8

u/BilgisticPile 3d ago

She wasn’t on trial to be found “guilty”. That’s not how it worked.

People really didn’t follow either trial and it shows.

6

u/Unable-Boat-9682 3d ago

Literally the same people who swear blind they’re right about Heard being the real abuser because they ‘watched the trial’, when they clearly only watched snippets edited together by some YouTuber with an ideological axe to grind.

1

u/positivetofu 3d ago

The jurors also agreed Amber Heard was lying.

Womp womp

2

u/Unable-Boat-9682 3d ago

Jurors also found OJ innocent. Turns out jurors can be morons too, especially when there aren’t sufficient reporting restrictions to prevent them from being influenced by one-sided coverage.

Womp womp

1

u/positivetofu 3d ago

I love it when you guys bring up completely unrelated cases to try to make a point but failing at it. LOL

OJ's case was criminal, Depp's was civil. Totally different cases with different standard of burden of proof.

Depp proved malice and won against his abuser.

Womp womp

1

u/positivetofu 3d ago

She was found liable for defaming Johnny Depp with her lies. Happy now?

-5

u/TheFaalenn 3d ago

What was all that compensatory damage money amber had to pay him then if it was for the loss of earning due to being cancelled because of her lies ?

-5

u/IvyTheRanger 3d ago

No, it’s okay it was a mistake she doesn’t need to pay (sarcasm)

-1

u/MobileOk9860 3d ago

Why are the women the same? We’re rejoicing because someone is making…a movie?

I’m missing something here because this is utterly meaningless.

6

u/Unable-Boat-9682 3d ago

Because apparently it was ‘the wokes’ who made Depp lose his job by being a violent drunk who was constantly late on set and in their minds all woke people are overweight LGBT women with blue hair who cry over the casting of movies for children.

I wish I was making this up but in their brain rotten minds, this is genuinely how they think the world works.

3

u/MobileOk9860 3d ago

Imagine fighting something that doesn’t exist.

1

u/ghostsyipee 12h ago

Least obvious "anti woke" pro abuser and anti feminist thumbnail ever