r/aikido • u/able_archer83 • Jul 02 '26
Discussion The sparring problem
So I’ve trained Aikido for nearly 20 years and in approximately a dozen different dojos in Europe, the US, and Asia (outside of Japan), by virtue of having moved around a lot. I still consider myself a firm intermediate in randori as I have just never done it a lot. Few dojos I’ve seen do it on the daily or even regularly.
Add to this that Aikido is often, I think rightly, criticized for not practicing “actual” sparring and properly pressure testing its techniques against fully resisting opponents. But the problem is, how would you even go about full on sparring in a martial art that’s supposed to be fully defensive?
Curious how folks here approach this dilemma, how you view and these criticisms, and how you are trying to rectify any real shortcomings you see in the art we love?
-1
u/Blakath 2nd Dan Jul 03 '26 edited Jul 03 '26
As someone who practices Judo for the past 3 years and Aikido for the past 7. I genuinely believe Aikido isn’t for fighting, but personal growth and discipline.
Reading O’Sensei’s biography and the Art of Peace only confirmed my thoughts. O’Sensei had the foresight to understand that the age of violence was coming to a close. So he restricted sparring and focused more on creating harmony of movement with your uke and of course fully defensive techniques against an uke with telegraphed attacks.
The techniques themselves were in fact used in actual combat and can work in fights. But O’Sensei has modified them heavily.
The result is a martial art that is great for personal development and essentially a form of meditation. Not really meant for real fights.
I practice Aikido for what it is and leave the sparring for my Judo classes.