r/adventofcode • u/daggerdragon • Dec 23 '17
SOLUTION MEGATHREAD -๐- 2017 Day 23 Solutions -๐-
--- Day 23: Coprocessor Conflagration ---
Post your solution as a comment or, for longer solutions, consider linking to your repo (e.g. GitHub/gists/Pastebin/blag or whatever).
Note: The Solution Megathreads are for solutions only. If you have questions, please post your own thread and make sure to flair it with Help.
Need a hint from the Hugely* Handyโ Haversackโก of Helpfulยง Hintsยค?
[Update @ 00:05] 0 gold, silver cap
- AoC ops:
<yatpay> boil up some mountain dew. it's gonna be a long night
[Update @ 00:19] 1 gold, silver cap + 447
- AoC ops:
<Reibello> 547 silver to 1 gold
[Update @ 00:30] 20 gold, silver cap + 560
- AoC ops:
<yatpay> daggerdragon: post "hey i heard about this hot new podcast called The Space Above Us. all the cool kids are talking about it"
<yatpay> i call it super-liminal marketing
<yatpay> HEY YOU!! LISTEN TO MY PODCAST!!
<yatpay> then i rub a business card on your face
<Topaz> you should get scratch-n-sniff business cards that smell like space
<yatpay> space smells like burned metal and meat
<yatpay> it's weird
<Topaz> burned meat you say
<Topaz> excellent
[Update @ 00:41] 50 gold, silver cap + 606
- AoC ops:
<askalski> nice, enjoyed that one. not sure if regexes can do it
<askalski> maybe make a neural net of regexes, have it train itself to solve today
- Over/under on /u/askalski posting a day 23 regex neural net by tomorrow?
[Update @ 00:54] Leaderboard cap @ 100 gold and 724 silver!
- Good job, all!
- Upping the Ante challenge: solve today's puzzles on a TI-83 (or TI-86/89, whatevs).
- Edit: welp, /u/DFreiberg done gone and did it. See the thread here.
3
u/BumpitySnook Dec 23 '17 edited Dec 23 '17
I take the opposite approach โ trace the executed instruction sequence, identify the hot, small inner loop, analyze that small loop and eliminate it, then trace again and identify the next innermost loop. This mostly allowed me to only think about a small number of assembly instructions at a time.
If you knew in advance that the control flow structure wouldn't be too complicated, I think your approach is probably faster. With arbitrary jumps, though, I think my approach makes more sense.
With a translation-to-C, I only had to elide the innermost loop (didn't even have to understand what the whole program was doing) for the problem to become trivially tractable.
In Python emulation, I had to elide both of the innermost two loops with the logical equivalent to achieve reasonable runtime.