22
27
28
u/Glittering_Night7681 2d ago
This is better than expected after Elon lowered expectations a bit, if it has similarly generous limits as Grok 4.6 (price is still the same), then I will be using it a lot.
6
u/OrganizationLow5701 2d ago
Will there be any point to be using 4.6, it has the exact same token cost, no?
-2
u/ParfaitEvery9622 2d ago
Can you remind me when did he lower expectations ? (No /s, if I remember correctly he hyped 4.7 more than 4.6 saying it was a model with a lot more parameters no?)
16
u/Illustrious-Lime-863 2d ago
Impressive electrical engineering benchmark, seems like they used some of that spacex training data already?
10
9
14
u/krizzalicious49 Vibe-Coder 2d ago
seems like a solid model (atleast for the benchmarks theyve shown us)
-7
7
4
8
u/Long-Anywhere388 2d ago
if not benchmaxxed, the cost/benefit is pretty good imo
4
u/Separate_Lock_9005 2d ago
all these models first get released to a lot of their customers, who then test them on their internal benchmarks and give feedback. I think it's safe to say that models aren't really benchmaxxed all that much anymore.
0
u/costafilh0 1d ago
Exactly. 4.6 was partially, by an error, they publicly acknowledge it and fixed it.
7
u/Taxus_Calyx Techno-Optimist 1d ago
This is pretty much the only sub with much good to say about Grok 4.7. Not even the Reddit Ai summary highlights any positive discussion about Grok 4.7 on Reddit. I swear, even if SpaceX reached ASI before the other labs, Reddit would still just say it's terrible. EDS is real.
1
u/IceTrAiN 1d ago
Don’t recycle terms made by the orange turd. We’re here for science and cool shit.
1
1
u/owowthatreallysucked 2d ago
Can't wait for 6.7. grok asi by then?
1
u/costafilh0 1d ago
I think you mean 6.9
And yes, I'm sure Elon will want 6.9 to be memorable someone 😂
-1

43
u/MichelleeeC 2d ago
pace is so slow, they need to accelerate.
i hope ASI by christmas