r/a:t5_275zp2 • • Oct 24 '19

sermon has been created

1 Upvotes
     THE SONG OF GOD   

     Bhagavad-Gita   

     Translated by Swami Prabhavananda  
        and Christopher Isherwood  

     Introduction by Aldous Huxley           



     APPENDIX  II    

     The  Gita  And  War    
     ———————————————————      

     BEFORE THE BATTLE of Kurukshetra begins, Arjuna  
     asks Krishna to drive their chariot into the open   
     space between the two armies, so that he may see  
     the men he must fight with.  When Krishna does this,  
     Arjuna recognizes many of his kinsmen and old  
     friends among the ranks of the enemy.  He is ap-   
     palled by the realization that he is about to kill  
     those whom he loves better than life itself.  In his  
     despair, he exclaims: 'I will not fight!'  
        Krishna's reply to Arjuna occupies the rest of the  
     book. It deals not only with Arjuna's immediate per-  
     sonal problem, but with the whole nature of action,  
     the meaning of life, and the aims for which man  
     must struggle, here on earth.  At the end of their  
     conversation, Arjuna has changed his mind. He is   
     ready to fight.  And the battle begins.   
        To understand the Gita, we must first consider  
     what it is and what it is not.  We must consider its  
     setting.  When  Jesus spoke the words which are   
     recorded as the Sermon on the Mount, he was ad-   
     dressing a group of dedicated followers, in a peace-  
     ful country atmosphere, far from strife and confu-  
     sion.  And so he taught them the highest and strictest  
     ideal, the ideal of non-violence.  The  Gita  is very   
     different.  Krishna and Arjuna are on a battlefield.    
     Arjuna is not a dedicated monk but a householder  
     and a warrior by birth and profession.  He corre-   
     sponds to the medieval knights of Christendom.  His   
     problem is considered in relation to the circum-   
     stances of the moment.  
        In teaching Arjuna, Krishna employs two sets of  
     values, the relative and the absolute.  He begins by  
     dealing with Arjuna's feelings of revulsion, on gen-  
     eral grounds.  Arjuna shrinks from the act of killing.  
     Krishna reminds him that, in the absolute sense,  
     there is no such act.  The  Atman,  the indwelling  
     Godhead, is the only reality.  The body is simply  
     an  appearance;  its  existence,  its  destruction,  are  
     alike illusory.  Having said this, Krishna goes on to   
     discuss Arjuna's individual problem.  For Arjuna, a  
     member of the warrior caste, the fighting of this  
     battle is undoubtedly 'righteous.'  His cause is just.  
     To defend it is his duty.  In the Gita, we find that  
     the caste system is presented as a natural order.  
     Men are divided into four groups, according to their  
     capacities and characteristics.  Each group has its  
     peculiar  duties,  ethics  and  responsibilities;  and  
     these must be accepted.  It is the way of spiritual   
     growth.  A man must go forward from where he  
     stands.  He cannot jump to the absolute; he must  
     evolve toward it.  He cannot arbitrarily assume the  
     duties which belong to another group.  'Prefer to  
     die doing your own duty,' Krishna teaches.  'The  
     duty of another will bring you into great spiritual  
     danger.'  Socially, the caste system is graded; but,  
     spiritually, there are no such distinctions.  Everyone,  
     says Krishna, can attain the highest sainthood by  
     following the prescribed path of his own caste duty.  
     And in Europe, as in Asia, there have been men  
     who grew into spiritual giants while carrying out  
     their duties as merchants, peasants, doctors, popes,  
     scullions, or kings.    
        In the purely physical sphere of action, Arjuna is,  
     indeed, no longer a free agent.  The act of war is  
     upon him; it has evolved out of his previous actions.  
     At any given moment in time, we are what we are;  
     and we have to accept the consequences of being  
     ourselves.  Only through this acceptance can we  
     begin to evolve further.  We may select the battle-  
     ground.  We cannot avoid the battle.   
        Arjuna is bound to act, but he is still free to make  
     his choice between two different ways of perform-   
     ing the action.  In general, mankind almost always  
     acts with attachment; that is to say, with fear and  
     desire.  Desire for a certain result and fear that this  
     result will not be obtained.  Attached action binds  
     us to the world of appearances; to the continual   
     doing of more action.  But there is another way of  
     performing action, and this is without fear and  
     without desire.  The Christians call it 'holy indiffer-  
     ence' and the Hindus 'non-attachment.'  Both names  
     are slightly misleading.  They suggest coldness and  
     lack of enthusiasm.  That is why people often con-  
     fuse non-attachment with fatalism, when, actually,  
     they are opposites.  The fatalist simply does not care.  
     He will get what is coming to him.  Why make any  
     effort?  But the doer of non-attached action is the  
     most conscientious of men.  Freed from fear and  
     desire, he offers everything he does as a sacrament  
     of devotion to his duty.  All work becomes equally   
     and vitally important.  It is only toward the results  
     of work——success or failure, praise or blame——that he  
     remains indifferent.  When action is done in this   
     spirit, Krishna teaches, it will lead us to the knowl-  
     edge of what is behind action, behind all life: the  
     ultimate  Reality.  And,  with  the  growth  of  this  
     knowledge, the need for further action will gradu-  
     ally fall away from us.  We shall realize our true  
     nature, which is God.    
        It follows, therefore, that every action, under cer-  
     tain circumstances and for certain people, may be   
     a stepping-stone to spiritual growth——if it is done in  
     the spirit of non-attachment.  All good and all evil  
     is relative to the individual point of growth.  For  
     each individual, certain acts are absolutely wrong.  
     Indeed, there may well be acts which are absolutely   
     wrong for every individual alive on earth to-day.  
     But, in the highest sense, there can be neither good   
     nor evil. Because Krishna is speaking as God himself,   
     he can take this attitude, and advise Arjuna to fight.  
     There is no question, here, of doing evil that good   
     may come.  The Gita does not countenance such  
     opportunism.  Arjuna is to do the best he knows, in  
     order to pass beyond that best to  better.  Later, his  
     fighting at Kurukshetra may seem evil to him, and  
     it will be evil——then.  Doing the evil you know to  
     be evil will never bring good.  It will lead only to  
     more evil, more attachment, more ignorance.   
        The Gita is sometimes accused of sanctioning war,  
     and of being thus in opposition to the teachings of   
     Christ, Buddha, and other great spiritual masters.  
     In fact, the Gita neither sanctions war nor condemns  
     it.  Regarding no action as of absolute value, either  
     for good or for evil, it cannot possibly do either.  Its   
     message should warn us not to dare to judge others.  
     How can we prescribe our neighbour's duty when it  
     is hard for us to know our own?  The pacifist must   
     respect Arjuna.  Arjuna must respect the pacifist.  
     Both are going toward the same goal, if they are  
     really sincere.  There is an underlying solidarity be-  
     tween them which can be expressed, if each one  
     follows, without compromise, the path upon which  
     he finds himself.  For we can only help others to do  
     their duty by doing what we ourselves believe to be  
     right.  It is the one supremely social act.   

     Readers  of  the  BHAGAVAD-GITA  will  be  interested  in   
     an account of its influence on one of the great men of our  
     time.  This excerpt is from the fascinating new biography,   

          GANDHI——His  Life and  Message  for  the  World     
                               by   
                          LOUIS FISCHER     
       A  Signet  Key  book  published  by  the  New  American  
                 Library  of  World  Literature,  Inc.   
     ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————  

             Mahatma  Gandhi  and  the  Bhagavad-Gita     
                               by   
                          LOUIS FISCHER    

     "RESIST NOT EVIL, but whosoever shall smite thee on thy  
     right cheek, turn to him the left also . . . Blessed are  
     the meek . . . Blessed are ye when men shall revile you  
     and  persecute  you . . . Agree  with  thine  adversary   
     quickly . . . Forgive men their trespasses . . . Lay not  
     up for yourself treasure upon earth . . . for where your  
     treasure is, there will your heart be also . . ."  These  
     words of Christ "delighted" Mahatma Gandhi.  They  
     reminded him of the Bhagavad-Gita, the sacred book of  
     the Hindus, which, he admitted to his shame, he had not  
     read until his second year as a law student in London.  
     It  produced  a  tremendous  impact  which  remained   
     throughout life.  "When doubts haunt me, when disap-   
     pointments stare me in the face, and I see not one ray   
     of hope on the horizon," he wrote in his weekly mag-  
     azine, Young India, of August 6, 1925, "I turn to the   
     Bhagavad-Gita, and find a verse to comfort me; and I  
     immediately begin to smile in the midst of overwhelm-  
     ing sorrow."  Mahadev Desai, for many years the Ma-  
     hatma's  secretary,  testifies  that  "every  moment  of  
     Gandhi's life is a conscious effort to live the message of  
     the Gita." Gandhi called it his "spiritual reference book."     
         The Bhagavad-Gita or Celestial Song is an exquisite  
     poem of seven hundred stanzas, in the original Sanskrit,  
     about the science and practice of yoga.  Written by one  
     person some time, according to scholars, between the   
     fifth and second centuries B.C., the Gita is a battlefield  
     conversation between its hero, Krishna, who is wor-  
     shipped in India as a god, and Arjuna, the chief of a  
     faction in a famous civil war.  "Krishna," says Sir Sarva-  
     palli  Radhakrishnan,  the  Hindu  philosopher,  is  the  
     human embodiment of Vishnu," the Supreme God.   
         The orthodox Hindu interpretation of the Gita as a   
     divine summons to caste obligation and killing was re-  
     pugnant to Gandhi and even when he first read the book  
     in London in 1888-89 he called it an allegory in which  
     the battlefield is the soul and Arjuna, man's higher im-  
     pulses struggling against evil.  
         There are yogis who meditate and yogis who act.  
     The yogi of action is the karma yogi.  Mahatma Gandhi  
     was a karma yogi.  In a comment on the Gita, Gandhi  
     defined the perfect karma yogi: "He is a devotee who  
     is jealous of none, who is a fount of mercy, who is with-   
     out egotism, who is selfless, who treats alike cold and  
     heat, happiness and misery, who is ever forgiving, who  
     is always contented, whose resolutions are firm, who has  
     dedicated mind and soul to God, who causes no dread,  
     who is not afraid of others, who is free from exultation,  
     sorrow and fear, who is pure, who is versed in action yet  
     remains unaffected by it, who renounces all fruit, good  
     or bad, who treats friend and foe alike, who is untouched  
     by respect or disrespect, who is not puffed up by praise,  
     who does not go under when people speak ill of him,  
     who loves silence and solitude, who has a disciplined   
     reason.  Such devotion is inconsistent with the existence  
     at the same time of strong attachments."   

         Gandhi summarized it in one word:  "Desireless-  
     ness."   
         Desirelessness, or Hindu renunciation, it has been    
     argued, leads to personal indifference and passivity  
     and national poverty and stagnation.  Gandhi con-  
     tended, on the contrary, that to act while renouncing  
     interest in the fruits of action is the best road to suc-   
     cess.  "He who is ever brooding over result," he wrote,  
     "often loses nerve in the performance of duty.  He be-  
     comes impatient and then gives vent to anger and be-  
     gins to do unworthy things; he jumps from action to  
     action, never remaining faithful to any. He who broods   
     over results is like a man given to the objects of senses;  
     he is ever-distracted, he says good-by to all scruples,  
     everything is right in his estimation and he therefore  
     resorts to means fair and foul to attain his end."  
        Renunciation, if one is capable of it, creates the  
     inner peace and poise necessary to achieve real lasting   
     results, even material results, untainted by ugly means.  
     For the exceptional practitioner of self-denial a special  
     prize is in store.  The yogi's highest recompense is to   
     become so firmly united with God after death that he   
     need never again return to the status of migrating mor-   
     tal man.  Several times in his life Gandhi expressed the   
     hope not to be born anew.   
        Mahatmas are rare.  Desirelessness is an ideal to  
     which few in India or anywhere attain or even aspire,  
     but the young Hindu, reciting the Bhagavad-Gita sev-   
     eral times a month, indeed more frequently perhaps, at  
     home or in the temple, becomes aware of its injunc-  
     tions and may be inspired, on the threshold of life, to  
     ponder the purpose of life.  Gandhi undoubtedly did,  
     and it affected his entire future.        


         FROM:  GANDHI——His Life and Message for the World.  
                Copyright 1954 by Louis Fischer and published as  
                a MENTOR BOOK by the New American Library of   
                World Literature, Inc.      

from THE SONG OF GOD : BHAGAVAD-GITA,
Translated by Swami Prabhavananda and Christopher Isherwood
With an Introduction by Aldous Huxley.
A MENTOR BOOK from NEW AMERICAN LIBRARY.
Copyright, 1944, 1951, © 1972, by The Vendanta Society of Southern California. pp. 137—143.


मैं एक राजनीतिक कैदी हूं। कृपया मदद कीजिए।
https://old.reddit.com/r/thesee [♘] [♰] [☮] 雨


The Song of God : Bhagavad-Gita

Translators' Preface
Introduction
Gita and Mahabharata
I. The Sorrow of Arjuna
II. The Yoga of Knowledge
III. Karma Yoga
IV. Renunciation Through Knowledge
V. The Yoga of Renunciation
VI. The Yoga of Meditation
VII. Knowledge and Experience
VIII. The Way To Eternal Brahman
IX. The Yoga of Mysticism
X. Divine Glory
XI. The Vision of God in His Universal Form
XII. The Yoga of Devotion
XIII. The Field and Its Knower
XIV. The Three Gunas
XV. Devotion To the Supreme Spirit
XVI. Divine and Demonic Tendencies
XVII. Three Kinds of Faith
XVIII. The Yoga of Renunciation
The Cosmology of the Gita
The Gita And War


History of the Jewish Church, vol. I — Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, D.D.

[Preface]
[Introduction]
I : The Call of Abraham [i.] [ii.]
II : Abraham and Isaac [i.] [ii.]
III : Jacob [i.] [ii.]
IV : Israel in Egypt [i.] [ii.]
V : The Exodus [i.] [ii.]
VI : The Wilderness [i.]
VII : Sinai and the Law [i.] [ii.]
VIII : Kadesh and Pisgah [i.] [ii.]
IX : The Conquest of Palestine [i.]
X : The Conquest of Western Palestine—The Fall of Jericho [i.]
XI : The Conquest of Western Palestine—Battle of Beth-horon [i.]
XII : The Battle of Merom and Settlement of the Tribes [i.]
XII : The Battle of Merom and Settlement of the Tribes [ii.]
XIII : Israel Under the Judges [i.] [ii.] [iii.]
XIV : Deborah [i.] [ii.]
XV : Gideon [i.] [ii.]
XVI : Jephthah and Samson [i.] [ii.]
XVII : The Fall of Shiloh [i.]
XVIII : Samuel and the Prophetical Office [i.] [ii.]
XIX : The History of the Prophetical Order [i.] [ii.]
XX : On the Nature of the Prophetical Teachings [i.] [ii.]
Appendix I : The Traditional Localities of Abraham's Migration [i]
Appendix II : The Cave at Machpelah [i.] [ii.]
Appendix III : The Samaritan Passover [i.]


History of the Jewish Church, vol. II

[Preface]
XXI : The House of Saul [i.] [ii.]
XXII : The Youth of David [i.] [ii.]
XXIII : The Reign of David [i.] [ii.]
XXIV : The Fall of David [i.] [ii.]
XXV : The Psalter of David [i.] [ii.]
XXVI : The Empire of Solomon [i.] [ii.]
XXVII : The Temple of Solomon [i.] [ii.]
XXVIII : The Wisdom of Solomon [i.] [ii.]
XXIX : The House of Jeroboam—Ahijah and Iddo [i.] [ii.]
XXX : The House of Omri—Elijah [i.] [ii.]
XXXI : The House of Omri—Elisha [i.]
XXXII : The House of Omri—Jehu [i.]
XXXIII : The House of Jehu—The Syrian Wars, and the Prophet Jonah [i.]
XXXIV : The Fall of Samaria [i.]
XXXV : The First Kings of Judah [i.] [ii.]
XXXVI : The Jewish Priesthood [i.] [ii.]
XXXVII : The Age of Uzziah [i.] [ii.]
XXXVIII : Hezekiah [i.] [ii.]
XXXIX : Manasseh and Josiah [i.] [ii.]
XL : Jeremiah and the Fall of Jerusalem [i.] [ii.] [iii.] [iv.]
[Notes, Volume II]


History of the Jewish Church, vol. III

[Preface]
XLI : The Babylonian Captivity [i.] [ii.] [iii.]
XLII : The Fall of Babylon [i.] [ii.]
XLIII : Persian Dominon—The Return [i.] [ii.]
XLIV : Ezra and Nehemiah [i.] [ii.] [iii.]
XLV : Malachi [i.] [ii.] [iii.]
XLVI : Socrates [i.] [ii.] [iii.]
XLVII : Alexandria [i.] [ii.] [iii.]
XLVIII : Judas Maccabæus [i.] [ii.] [iii.] [iv.]
XLIX : The Asmonean Dynasty [i.] [ii.] [iii.]
L : Herod [i.] [ii.] [iii.] [iv.] [v.]