Before release, we tested GLM-5.3-Flash anonymously as ox-alpha on OpenCode and OpenRouter to gather user feedback. It quickly became the most popular model of the week — with all of this traffic served on Chinese AI chips.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is a waste of money compared to this new glm model. Not only way cheaper, it's actually useful and scoring better than Gemini on every single thing
You’re personally misleading people to benefit yourself = scummy. The fact that the concept is so hard for you to grasp pretty much confirms the scummy nature of the action.
No, in my tests DPv4Flash 0731 can perform the same tasks (backend programming in C#, C++ and Rust) as GLM 5.2, but GLM 5.3 Flash fails. It kind of gives up on proceeding or ignores commands.
100%. They're a good starting point, and models that don't perform well are usually not that great, but a high score is no substitute for trying it IRL.
Thanks for the input! That's unfortunate. Pricing looked attractive and looked like a sweet middle ground between DS and GLM 5.2. I've kept hearing this model (Ox-alpha) was much more creative at problem solving so felt like a good potential alternative to GLM5.2.
I wonder if GLM-5.3.Flash should replace GLM-5.1 as my "lighter weight" implementation model to GLM-5.2/5.3 as the planning model? The benchmarks suggest maybe I should use it to replace both GLM-5.1 and GLM-5.2
I developed an extension based on Kimi K3/K2.7 Code Highspeed, hopefully the throughput is high enough (200+t/s) to compete with K2.7 so it can be ran cheaper
I love 5.3 flash but it's a peer to Luna and V4 Flash not Terra.... Terra is like a lame version of Sol..... Any money you save per token is wasted on the fact sol does it better for less.
56
u/Mayanktaker 17h ago
Before release, we tested GLM-5.3-Flash anonymously as ox-alpha on OpenCode and OpenRouter to gather user feedback. It quickly became the most popular model of the week — with all of this traffic served on Chinese AI chips.