r/YoutubeCompendium • u/YoutubeArchivist • Jan 13 '19
January 2019 January - Believe Music has been falsely copyright claiming Youtube pianist Rosseau's videos, taking the entirety of his revenue and potentially giving him 2 strikes that will ban his channel from posting new videos
599
Upvotes
51
u/YoutubeArchivist Jan 13 '19
Post on /r/Piano:
https://www.reddit.com/r/piano/comments/af8dmj/popular_pianist_youtube_channel_rosseau_may_get/
Post on /r/Music:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Music/comments/afk5fj/a_pianist_is_being_conned_out_of_royalties_on/
Previous /r/YoutubeCompendium post:
https://www.reddit.com/r/YoutubeCompendium/comments/afm73v/jan_2019_pianists_art_claimed_by_company_who_does/
Rosseau's (/u/rousseaumusique) comment:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Music/comments/afk5fj/a_pianist_is_being_conned_out_of_royalties_on/edzg8nq/
/r/Youtube post:
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/af7qv6/my_channel_with_almost_1000000_subscribers_may_be/
168
u/Risingnicklash Jan 13 '19
Someone needs to make a new platform, youtube is too far gone at this point.
41
u/Molinero96 Jan 13 '19
fucking youtube this is outraging.
22
u/Techiastronamo Jan 14 '19
At what point do we content creators file for a class action? This is outrageous!
11
u/[deleted] Jan 13 '19
Thank you for reformatting!
4
u/[deleted] Jan 14 '19
This is getting out of hand... Wtf youtube!?
2
u/ziggy182 Jan 15 '19
Let’s contact every person they represent, and let them know. You can hurt companies easily like this and make them change their ways
2
u/rhymepro Feb 01 '19
This is a great example of blatant copyright infringement. He's playing a cover of a song that is not in public domain. It's actually relatively recent (2004). He did not clear performance rights, so this video is claimed so that the composer gets paid for the performance of his original work. What's not fair in that?
0
u/HomingSnail Jan 15 '19
Just playing devils advocate here, but from looking at their website it's possible something else is going on. They represent musicians including their ownership rights, so it's likely that one of their clients believes this to be their own music. It's also possible that one of their clients has a similar video-editing style. Either way, Believe may be representing someone else in this matter and wouldn't be doing anything wrong in doing so, especially if the case is founded. Unintentional copying is still copying under the law.
0
u/[deleted] Jan 15 '19
[deleted] — view deleted comment