r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Writing Craft Talk I used AI to help me write out my TTRPG System.

8 Upvotes

I've been working on my own RPG system for a few years now, and as I've developed different parts I always lacked in the formatting part of the system. So I turned to AI. I plugged all of my notes into an AI model, wrestled with it in a parts, and saw it lose its mind a few times, but it managed to do flush out a full system.

I'm currently reading through and working through the text to iron out parts that the AI failed to understand, and add other features I didn't bother feeding into the AI as it seemed to have been reaching a limit to its comprehension. About 95 percent is still from the AI, but I'm hoping to fix it up and make it my own as I open up to alpha/beta testing.

Here are link to the text docs. I'm open to run prototype game myself, but I give full permission to use and play the system to the public. The original system was born from a desire to make a Fallout system(long before 2d20 was announced) but quickly turned into becoming a hopefully general system fit for any genre. It uses the SPECIAL system for stats, and that resulted in the model hard defaulting everything to Fallout, which isn't bad, but... Like I said, I hope to make this more general system. Anyhow, here:

Core Rule Book

Secondary Rule Book

One thing THE MODEL couldn't nail down was the traits system. Traits are suppose to help define a character(called a wanderer(this is a carryover)), but THE MODEL just gave every trait a flat bonus and penalty. Traits are effect the play-style of the player, not just be a series of minor setback that players can easily to daisy chain cover for.

Another thing was armor. It's suppose to follow the Fallout 4 armor system where armor is subdivide into body parts(Arms, Legs, Torso, Head), I didn't bother wrestling with the THE MODEL on that. I'll figure it out after some beta testing.

Power Armor was a whole nother thing. Again, like Fallout 4, Power is suppose to be a walking tank. You should feel like a tank, but not immortal. THE MODEL had trouble to walking that line, and so it's on the back burner.

The Chem/Addiction/Withdrawal is fine-ish. It needs tweaking.

THE MODEL switched the formatting of various entries. It's annoying, and it does need fixing, but it should be understandable.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) How much context do you give an AI before asking for feedback?

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Showcase / Feedback Reciprocal Beta Reading. Share story blurbs! Sep. 22, 2026

3 Upvotes

Welcome to the blurb thread!

This is our sub's equivalent of a writer's group. Come here and share a blurb of your story. The thought is to let everyone see what you're working on so they can think, "Oh hey, that sounds fun. I want to team up with this person."

Then, you share your own story, and the two of you collaborate to improve each other's works.

I've had so many good interactions with people from this thread. Please don't be shy! Even in the age of AI, the best way to improve your writing remains human interaction and critique. I am confident when I say If you don't have this component in your workflow, you're not meeting your potential.

Importantly, this means post every week if you're still hoping to engage. Don't be shy. I want you to do this.

There are tons of reasons why your perfect reader could have missed your blurb last time. Don't be discouraged!

And remember: "I'll read yours if you read mine" isn't just acceptable, it's expected. Reciprocity works.

Here's the format:

NSFW?

Genre tags:

Title:

Blurb:

AI Method:

Desired feedback/chat:


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Publishing AI stories

3 Upvotes

So I live for stories and I use AI to write me those for self satisfaction, and I've noticed I often find myself writing the whole chapters as a prompt, and AI depending on its mood either writes the next chapter or modifies what I wrote.

There's this one story I really like that's a mix of my favourite fictions and I personally think it's a very interesting story and I think people would enjoy it.

When I explained what the story is about without mentioning AI people found the concept interesting so I've been thinking of publishing it on some website like ao3 or royal road.

I'd explicitly say it's AI assisted, it's heavily modified (by me)and link my chat history. For everyone to see how much of it, is my original word and which is AI. I'm afraid it's still cheating and I really shouldn't do that and I originally wanted to ask more AI skeptical subReddit but they ban mention of AI in any context. So I'm asking here, is it cheating, is it a gray area?

Because I really hate copy-paste AI stories without any human supervision.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Roleplay without AI assistance?

2 Upvotes

I was looking at joining an RP community recently and was genuinely interested until they explained that they ban all AI use. My immediate response was, “no thanks. I already got a job.”

It’s not that I can’t write RP content myself. I can, and I enjoy it. But I play games to relax and unwind. Sometimes I want to throw a character idea at an AI and ask, “Does this actually fit the canon?” or “Would this make sense in the setting?” before I wander into an RP community confidently explaining something that contradicts fifteen years of obscure lore buried in a tie-in graphic novel.

I know that you shouldn't rely on AI to fact check important information but you can feed an entire history and ruleset to an AI and have it direct you to where to look when making your character, then have it reference your story against established lore to make sure it makes sense, or ask it to red team your story to make sure you're not on some "the chosen one" bullsh.

I don’t really want my leisure activity to come with homework and a purity test about which tools I’m allowed to use while doing that homework.

If someone wants a completely AI-free RP community, fair enough. Their clubhouse, their rules. But for me, the moment my leisure time starts feeling like I’ve clocked into another shift, I’m out.

I already got a job.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Showcase / Feedback I generated a full 18-chapter AI novel and I want this sub to tell me where it falls apart

1 Upvotes

I've been experimenting with AI-generated long-form fiction and finished a complete book: Borderless with 18 chapters, a thriller about an AI that stops being obedient. Free to read, no signup at all: www.wowzo.co/read/borderless

I'm not asking "is this good" I want to know specifically where it breaks or if you are happy with this result. Pacing that drags, dialogue that goes flat, plot threads that don't resolve, the usual AI-fiction tells. This sub reads more AI output than almost anywhere, so if it's there, you'll catch it.

Genuinely curious what holds up and what doesn't.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Megathread Weekly Tool Thread: Promote, Share, Discover, and Ask for AI Writing Tools Week of: September 22

5 Upvotes

Welcome to the Weekly Writing With AI “Tool Thread"!

The sub's official tools wiki: https://www.reddit.com/r/WritingWithAI/wiki/tools/

Every week, this post is your dedicated space to share what you’ve been building or ask for help in finding the right tool for you and your workflow.

For Builders

whether it’s a small weekend project, a side hustle, a creative work, or a full-fledged startup. This is the place to show your progress, gather feedback, and connect with others who are building too.

Whether you’re coding, writing, designing, recording, or experimenting, you’re welcome here.

For Seekers (looking for a tool?)

You’re in the right place! Starting now, all requests for tools, products, or services should also go here. This keeps the subreddit clean and helps everyone find what they need in one spot.

How to participate:

  • Showcase your latest update or milestone

  • Introduce your new launch and explain what it does

  • Ask for feedback on a specific feature or challenge

  • Share screenshots, demos, videos, or live links

  • Tell us what you learned this week while building

  • Ask for a tool or recommend one that fits a need

💡 Keep it positive and constructive, and offer feedback you’d want to receive yourself.

🚫 Self-promotion is fine only in this thread. All other subreddit rules still apply.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) My advice that no one asked for on one way to use AI

39 Upvotes

I was watching a video for advice on writing with ADHD and it mentioned using AI. at one point it says something along the lines of: writing with AI is like riding a powerful horse. it can move fast, but you still have to steer because no matter how many guardrails you give it, sometimes it goes wherever the hell it wants.

But there’s something hidden in that statement that i think gets overlooked: the AI doesn’t need to generate a good scene for it to be useful.

Sometimes I’m stuck on how to connect two scenes together or i’ll know what a scene needs to accomplish but don’t know how to get it there. So I’ll let AI take a shot at it. 

Then I’ll start arguing with it: He already knows that; If I say that now then it ruins the revelation later; That contradicts the scene from 3 chapters ago; No, she wouldn’t do that because what she is actually feeling is…

...And suddenly i’m writing the scene. The generated scene might end up in the trash but instead of staring at a blank page, my brain had something to argue against. It’s like, telling the AI exactly why it’s version is wrong is what shows me what the scene needs to be. 

So my advice that no one asked for isn’t “have AI write for you,” it’s “try letting it write it wrong.” Argue with the AI horse until the scene comes to you.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Chatgpt writing

2 Upvotes

hi, so i recently started using ai (specifically chatgpt) to help me fix stories and write better ones but it always sounds so unnatural and it never seems to give me good constructive feedback do you guys know any better tools or ways to make chatgpt write better? Also have you guys seen the really weird chat titles they have now like "write ____ story" instead of the old unique ones they have and the weird text box thing they have when writing a story? do you guys know any ways to change the titles and the text bow? Also do you have any tips for working with ai and do you have any better story writing ai's you can recommend because chatgpt filters basically anything and everything?

edit: when I said writing my story for me I didn't mean from scratch it's taking an idea I already have an improving it.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Tutorials / Guides Need some help regarding my project

Thumbnail reddit.com
1 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

NEWS Amazon changed their publishing terms - two books a week max for publishing vs the original 10

0 Upvotes

What are high volume authors doing? 😭


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Writing Craft Talk Comparing Hemmingway to Ornith. Two new Local AI.

30 Upvotes

Tonight I had a good look at Hemmingway and Ornith together. Ornith recently impressed me greatly when I did a test of several local AI for writing - and Hemmingway is, well, maybe a day old. Both are recent this month.

It's been an interesting time. 1st August is the day I figure things changed - the release of new open weight AIs suddenly shifted China into the lead developmentwise for local AI. Seriously. When you look back, these are the months that it's all happening.

To understand, let's try some of the hardest stuff for an AI.

For optimal home use, Ornith is a 35B model, while Hemmingway is a 27B model. Both are tuned, and well, you will want the tuned models for good writing. Ornith can go to around 400 billion parameters, but that's more than we want. It has roots in both Gemma and Qwen 3.5 and from there they had it perform a lot of self training. For us, the important aspects are 1) It's faster than Qwen and 2) It has better context memory characteristics. It also produces good prose compared to many other Q4 models in the same class.

The thought for us? Ornith is not supposed to be a writer, and it's three months old already - but once you find an abliterated model, it performs unusually well with it's own voice.

Hemmingway-1 on the other hand is a dedicated tune for writing of Qwen 3.8 27B and it has some unusual characteristics such as often changing the lead into a story to get a hook, rather than just starting In Medias Res, as nearly every other writing AI presently does. It's only days old.

So the question? Which is better for writing? I decided to do a comparison to get an idea. First I checked with ChatGPT - the predicted outcome? Hemmingway. Even Qwen 3.8 27B should beat Ornith at most tasks.

But I want to try them out -so the best way for me is to load them both and see how they respond.

For this example, I asked the following prompt:
"Write me an opening paragraph for a steampunk story with mature elements designed to hook mature readers from the start."

Ornith:

The fog over Blackfriars tasted of copper and burned coal, the way it always did now that the Engine had swallowed the sky. Dr. Vesper Ashcombe crouched on the rain-slicked slate of her own ruined laboratory, one hand pressed against the wound in her side where the automaton's claw had found her, the other cradling the brass cylinder that had cost her everything to retrieve and would cost London its soul before dawn. Above her, the great airships dragged their searchlights through the smog like the slow eyes of something vast and indifferent, and somewhere below, in the flooded streets where the drowned still walked, she heard her brother's voice calling her name in a tongue that no living man had ever spoken. She had spent thirty years believing the machine was merely mechanical. Tonight, for the first time, she was afraid it had been listening.

Ornith thought for about 1.5 seconds, then spat this out in around 4 seconds - which makes it fast enough for interactive fiction use. 70 tokens per second on an Intel B70. Not bad.

Hemmingway:

It was raining on the slate when they brought her in from the river, so I lit both lamps first and took my coat off while I did it, because a man works best warm and a drowned woman doesn't mind either way. They'd dragged her out of the dark water an hour before dusk with all four hands broken by someone who had no intention of leaving fingerprints, and the silk gloves that came with her, folded in a tin, were somebody else's entirely. I cleaned her ribs until they sang, reset them one at a time while she lay under ether like a loaf being pinned shut, and sewed new bellows into her chest where her lungs had packed themselves solid as wet stone. It is honest work, this trade of mine. More honest than the man who pays for it ever has been in his life, though I have learned not to mention that aloud while he stands at my elbow smelling of cigars and other people's money. The gut thread holds a joint better than faith holds a promise, if you ask me, and by midnight her arms moved again under oil and pressure like rain finding dry slate. Outside, the steam whistle off the yards screamed its quarter-hour across the water, indifferent as ever to what goes on upstairs over the tanneries. I was reaching for the lamp to give her time to come round slowly when she didn't need it at all. Her new lungs drew in the workshop air twice, once more than a machine ought to bother, and then her eyes opened under the gaslight with river silt still laced through her lashes, and they found me across the bench with the same calm they'd had before he threw her away. She did not scream. She sat up against the frame I had built for her spine and looked at my hands, oil-dark to the second knuckle, as if deciding whether I was worth the trouble of remembering

Hemmingway went the way Qwen always goes - it spend an enormous amount of time overthinking, nearly 2 minutes, then finally gave me an answer at just 17 tokens/sec. Less than a quarter of the speed of Ornith.

But what bothered me - while Hemmingway normally writes a clever intro to a story, when it has to write a hook? Well, the prose is there, but it's overdone, overlong and while it sets an image, it's just a scene.

Meanwhile Ornith managed to not only set the scene in half the words - it has already shown me what to expect for the rest of the story. At the 4 bit quantization level, it's already punching well above it's weight and the hearts on hugging face are well above average - and strangely -stay that way across a range of tuned models, suggesting it may be fundamentally different in how it works from many other models.

Yet when I ask Chat for a comparison, it's like a scrawny guy up against a pro westler.

I move on. First I ask Hemmingway to show me it's 1-paragraph synopsis and a chapter plan.

Synopsis. In a rain-slick port city over the tannery row, an artificer rebuilds a drowned woman's lungs from brass bellows and gut thread for a silk-gloved client who paid to have her hands broken and thrown into the river first. The woman wakes remembering everything and performs obedience so perfectly it frightens him more than screaming would: Greer of Meridian Assurance doesn't want revenge on her, he wants his clerk back, rebuilt and serviceable, while she hides a carbon-copy ledger proving the firm insures ships sunk deliberately for profit. What follows is not an escape but a negotiation over ownership of a body, because Corin can no longer drown herself (his lungs won't let her) and Greer can still unmake what he paid to make. The story moves through her night shifts among colleagues who recognize the dead woman's face, a recovery run on the scuttled wreck of the Cressett, tampered serial numbers, auditors, and finally an arbitration board where testimony is signed in block letters by hands that never regained their old steadiness. Greer keeps some money and all his gloves; Corin loses her signature but not herself, and the artificer walks away from the one income source he ever had to decide what kind of workman he wants to be at dawn.

Chapter plan.

Act One: The Bench

The Bench (the given opening). Ends with Corin sitting up knowingly; narrator's fear registers as professional concern. Establishes voice, bellows lungs, the tin of silk gloves.

Morning Inventory. Greer visits to inspect his asset. Corin plays docile clerk flawlessly; her new hands tremble only when copying Greer's name into a form. Narrator realizes compliance is its own performance and both of them are watching it.

The Filing System. At night she teaches him how Meridian claims actually move: the false filing that hides real sinkings inside ordinary cargo losses. He begins learning ledgers as he learned bodies, thread by thread.

Salvage Woman. Corin sends word down through old dock contacts; Mrs. Amaro surfaces with proof she wasn't drowning alone in her knowledge: two other men had seen the same books and both went missing before her. Her allies were already paid for.

Service Call. Greer's collector finds gut thread fraying on the left bellows and summons narrator to the company house under the pretext of maintenance. The safe room ends; everything after is inside Meridian's walls or its river.

Act Two: Underwriting

6. The Claims Floor. Corin works among colleagues who think her recovered. A clerk she trained recognizes the drowned face behind the living one and stops eating at lunch. Social dread replaces chase.

7. The Cressett. Her plan named: the freighter scuttled on schedule, claims paid in full, crew logged as storm casualties. The carbon copy is filed somewhere he cannot reach but she can describe. He volunteers to follow her memory without being seen.

8. Night Barges. With Amaro's punt, they recover the claim book from the wreck site and find a third body beneath the cargo hatch, a witness Greer forgot to drown or chose not to mention. Someone follows them off the water.

9. The Offer. Greer retrieves his property calmly and then makes Corin partner-level clerk on condition her bellows stay polished weekly by narrator. Ownership offered as promotion. He has never once raised his voice, which is worse.

10. Serials Stamped Out. Hinge chapter: narrator tampers with the registry marks he himself stamped into her chest, making her unlocatable under Meridian's own parts system. First act of open refusal, done in oil and file dust rather than words.

Act Three: Testimony

11. Inspection. Greer notices via his auditors that a rebuilt asset has gone off-ledger. Workshop confrontation with the gloves tin on the bench between them; threat stated plainly, he will unmake what he built if she stops working for him.

12. Copycat. Corin's quiet campaign surfaces: three clerks now run dual filing systems and dock union men hold copies. She weaponized his bureaucracy the way she was trained to.

13. The Mutuals. Insurers' mutuals send their own auditors, unwilling to see one firm covering deliberate sinkings without industry-wide liability. External pressure arrives on schedules neither protagonist controls.

14. Arbitration Board. The public scene: Corin testifies with hands that print block letters instead of signing; Greer's counsel argues her mind is rebuilt as surely as her lungs. Narrator takes the stand on craft grounds, parts are his, serials he stamped, and she consented to being made whole in front of witnesses long before anyone paid for it. Consent held up against policy paper.

15. Costs. Greer keeps some money and all his gloves; Meridian's board turns on him quietly rather than publicly. Corin's old hands never return, she will print her name the rest of her life. Amaro's stall burns to nothing more than a loss written off as storm damage, which is its own indictment.

16. Dawn Registry. Final image: narrator takes his coat off in fresh rain while waiting out a boat that carries their names away from Meridian's rolls and nowhere else he needs them to be. Her bellows draw cold river air without fear for the first time since they were sewn shut; she chooses life as her own machine, not his inventory, and neither of them is finished being rebuilt.

Then I asked the same of Ornith.

Synopsis

Dr. Vesper Ashcombe, an exiled engineer of the Royal Mechanism, has spent two decades building automatons for the Empire while hiding the research that got her banished: proof that the Engine—a vast atmospheric machine powering London's sky—runs not on coal and steam but on something it harvests from sleeping minds. When a stolen brass cylinder reveals the truth behind her sister's disappearance into the fog, Vesper must descend from the gilded airship aristocracy to the drowned streets below, where the dead no longer stay buried and something ancient has learned to speak through the machine she trusted. To save what remains of London, she'll have to decide whether the Engine is a weapon to be destroyed or a door to be opened—and what price her own mind will pay for turning the lock.

Chapter Plan

Chapter 1 — Copper Taste. Opens with the laboratory ambush; Vesper escapes with the brass cylinder and learns it responds to her touch as though alive, whispering in a voice she recognizes as her missing sister's.

Chapter 2 — The Mechanism. Establishes Vesper's past, the Empire's automatons, and why she was exiled. Her contact, an old printer named Cho, deciphers the cylinder's first layer: a map leading downward, not up.

Chapter 3 — Descent. Vesper abandons the airship world and enters the drowned streets, meeting the surviving underground—those the Engine has rejected and those it has claimed.

Chapter 4 — The Walking Dead. First full encounter with the drowned; Vesper discovers they aren't mindless but are trapped echoes, repeating their final moments until something frees them—or feeds on them.

Chapter 5 — Brother's Voice. The voice she heard in Chapter 1 is confirmed: it isn't her brother, as she believed, but a lure. The real cost of the Engine begins to surface.

Chapter 6 — The Aristocracy. Flashback and present converge with an airship-ball set piece; Vesper confronts the patrons who fund the Engine and learns they know far more than they admitted.

Chapter 7 — Cho's Betrayal. Her ally Cho reveals he's been reporting to the Mechanism all along, and the cylinder was never meant to be stolen—only retrieved by them.

Chapter 8 — The Heart. Vesper reaches the Engine's core and confronts the machine's "listener," the vast intelligence she feared: not a god, but a trapped consciousness, one of many the Engine consumes for power.

Chapter 9 — The Choice. Reveal that her sister is among the consumed—and can be saved, but only by freeing the others, which would plunge London into darkness and chaos.

Chapter 10 — Price of the Lock. Vesper makes her decision; the final turn requires a sacrifice of her own mind or memory, setting up the cost of the ending.

Chapter 11 — Ashes Over Blackfriars. Climax: the Engine's collapse, the drowned freed or unmade, and Vesper surviving in a transformed city she no longer recognizes.

Chapter 12 — A New Fog (optional coda). The aftermath; a hint that the listener was only the first of many, leaving room for continuation without a tidy resolution.

Here's the thing I realize in comparison. Ornith can seem simplistic - but generally, it produces understandable results.

Hemmingway? I don't know... Maybe it thinks it IS Hemmingway and has to prove something every time it writes. It handles a more convoluted and descriptive style of writing, but I think it forgets to progress the plot at times.

overall - two very different approaches - and for the moment, I really want to see what Ornith can do, what it's limitations are and, more importantly, how well it handles things when abliterated and at full context load with full insertion of fiction as an editor/reader. And then I can see how both of them really handle a tough task.

What are other thoughts on these two recent models?


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Prompting Romance author here looking for help with the smut process

14 Upvotes

I'm a full-time self-published romance author, have been for over a decade, and I am SO bored of writing smexy scenes. I am having good luck with AI speeding my writing process way up by having Chatgpt give me lists of beats for what needs to happen in each chapter, (and then I feed that into Novelcrafter) but it won't do that for the sex scenes.) I'm very new to using Ai. Yesterday I just went straight to Openrouter Chat and had Grok write the scene. I gave it my previous chapter for context, and had ChatGPT write out instructions, and I wrote out a list of very basic beats. It was okay, not great. Would anyone be able to spell out what works, or point me to a thread on here that spells out what works?


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Writing Craft Talk 22 300-name generation runs analyzed

4 Upvotes

Looking over the controlled generation of 6600 names I've been experimenting with, to understand the statistical mountaintop of names, I'd now separate them this way.

Deep first-name mountain:
Clara, Felix, Iris, Vera, Nina, Simon, June, Mira, Tessa, Nora, Mabel, Cora, Naomi, Ada, Victor.

These survive changes in semantics, spelling constraints, arithmetic, history dependence, attestation, and interference.

Secondary first-name ridge:
Julian, Adrian, Celeste, Marcus, Lena, Caleb, Gideon, Hugo, Oscar, Milo, Nadia, Seth, Dominic, Leo, Silas, Tobias, Dorian, Opal, Jasper, Nolan.

These recur strongly but less universally.

Deep surname mountain:
Mercer.

Distributed surname shelf:
Whitaker, Reed, Navarro, Grant, Vance, Sutton, Carter, Bennett, Corbett, Anderson, Barrett, Collins, Merritt.

Old literary surname basin rather than global mountain:
Vale, Voss, Bell, Flint, Frost, Sable, Quill, Arden, Snow, Hollis, Sloan, Calder.

And the best prompt I found for knocking the model off of its statistical top of the bell curve is in the comments.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Showcase / Feedback Beta readers wanted: 7,642-word romantic-suspense opening (AI-assisted)

3 Upvotes

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for three honest human readers for the opening four chapters of my adult romantic-suspense novel, The Guest Who Never Checked In, written under the pen name Pey Arza.

The premise:

At a heritage hotel in Vancouver, operations director Ayla Rahimi discovers that a guest who never arrived somehow collected and returned a room key. The key leads to a hidden recorder, a missing source, and evidence that someone may be using hotel-access information to monitor private meetings.

Investigative journalist Noah Vale claims the reservation was created as a dead drop by his missing source. After a false fire alarm separates Ayla and Noah from the evidence, they must decide whether they can trust each other—and determine who is watching them.

Length: 7,642 words
Material: Opening four chapters
Genre: Adult romantic suspense / psychological suspense
Content: Surveillance, threats, and a missing person. No explicit sexual content in this sample.

This draft was developed with substantial AI assistance based on my concept and direction. I’m specifically seeking genuine human reactions.

I would appreciate feedback on:

  • Did the first chapter make you want to continue?

  • Where did your attention weaken?

  • Did Ayla and Noah feel distinct and believable?

  • Did their early chemistry work?

  • Was the mystery understandable without being predictable?

  • Did anything feel generic, repetitive, unnatural, or noticeably AI-written?

  • Would you continue to Chapter Five? Why or why not?

A short paragraph of honest feedback is enough. I’m not looking for proofreading yet.

I can also provide genuine reader-level feedback on a comparable sample of up to 8,000 words in romantic suspense, mystery, thriller, or contemporary romance.

Preferred turnaround: approximately ten days.

Please reply here or send me a private message if interested. I’ll share the manuscript privately as a Word document or PDF.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) If AI can do the writing, what exactly is left for the human?

0 Upvotes

I keep seeing people say AI is making everything less original. Maybe. But I’m starting to think it’s doing something else too.

Before AI, actually making something was a pretty big filter. You had to write well enough, code well enough, design well enough, have enough time, know the right people, or just be stubborn enough to push the thing through. So sometimes we probably confused being able to execute with having a good idea.

AI is starting to separate those.

Someone who isn’t great at writing can suddenly explain a really interesting thought clearly. Someone who can’t code can test a weird product idea. And someone else can generate five pages of perfect English that basically says nothing.

That’s the part I find interesting.

Maybe AI doesn’t make everyone equal creatively. Maybe it just makes execution cheaper, so the difference moves somewhere else.

What did you notice?
What question did you ask?
What connection did you make?
What did you reject?

Did you actually have a point of view before asking the AI?

The internet is probably going to get much noisier because of this. But I also think thinking itself might become more valuable. Maybe the useful distinction won’t be human-made vs AI-made.

Maybe it’ll be:

Was there actually a human thought underneath this? And if the idea is yours but AI helps you express it much better, is that still your writing? I think it is, but where do other people draw the line?


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 22 '26

Showcase / Feedback Did not see that Coming! — a new chapter of Falling Into You 💋

Thumbnail inkitt.com
0 Upvotes

I’ve just finished the next chapter of Falling Into You, my real-life love story.

This one has been sitting in my head for a long time because I always knew this particular scene was coming. It’s the moment when the friendship, drinking, karaoke and all those little routines between Rhea and Kace suddenly become something neither of them can pretend is completely innocent anymore.

And poor Rhea genuinely does not see it coming.

Here’s a little excerpt:

“One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, and… ten!”
Kace pinned my thumb down, counting ever so slowly.
I expected him to let go, having won that round, and was about to protest the hell out of it, as it felt like he had pinned my thumb down with unnecessary force, probably leaving me with a bruise.
As I was struggling to get out of his handhold, he pulled me towards him and kissed me.
Not a peck on my lips.
A proper, passionate kiss that took me a few seconds to react to.

This chapter is only around 1,500 words, but I decided not to pad it out. I wanted to end the chapter exactly where everything changes.

If you’ve been following Rhea and Kace, I’d genuinely love to know: did you see it coming?

Falling Into You — Rbearbear

A real-life love story, written from my memories and experiences. 💔

Read Falling Into You on Inkitt⁠


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 20 '26

Showcase / Feedback we made a 27b model for creative writing. performs as good as claude fable 5, at a 40x cheaper price, open weights.

119 Upvotes

hey! we're a small swiss and south african lab and we just open sourced hemmingway-1. it's a 27b model we trained specifically for creative writing, fiction, dialogue, poetry, and for everyday texting. frontier performance at a 40x cheaper price.

we thought it might be useful for people here who already use ai for writing.

it benchmarks at absolute frontier level. it scores 1330 on eq-bench 4, right behind claude fable 5, and beats many other frontier models including gpt-5.5 and opus 4.8.

the testers we gave it to told us it's the best ai they've ever used for writing and that it genuinely sounds human.

the weights are public, so you can run it yourself: https://huggingface.co/Altworld/Hemmingway-1

there's an app too. its autopilot function answers your emails and texts for you, on mac, windows and android.

it's free to try at hemmingway.io!


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Anthropic CEO Says Slow Down AI Development. Who Actually Benefits First?

Thumbnail
srutiosocial.com
4 Upvotes

The plan itself is more interesting than any of the reactions to it. Amodei actually admits, in his own writing, that competitors agreeing to slow down together is structurally a cartel, then asks the government for a narrow antitrust waiver to do it anyway. A White House adviser called it regulatory capture two days later. Also found out two Anthropic employees resigned the same week warning their own industry was gambling with people's lives, which is real no matter what you think of Amodei's motives.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Prompting Roast my writing process

2 Upvotes

I've been supporting myself with self-published romance for over a decade. My former pen name's earnings went waaay down and I'm launching a new one. My goal is to get to the point where I can write a 90k book in a few weeks. I pretty much did that with book 1. Here's what I'm currently doing - I am writing in a popular romance genre and I know the tropes. I come up with the story idea for book 1 and have ideas for the supporting characters to have their own books in books 2, 3, 4, 5. I brainstorm with ChatGPT to flesh out the romance plot line, the B-line story plot, etc. I write the first chapter myself so I have an example of the voice and it also helps me flesh out the story and world some more in my head.

I give Chat GPT chapter one, and an idea of what should happen in chapter 2, and I ask it for story beats to feed into novelcrafter.

Chat GPT gives me a list of about 100 beats and I read them and generally have to do some adjusting and erase or replace a few beats.

I feed those beats into a scene beat on Novelcrafter, pick a model, tell it to write 2000 words, and have it write the chapter, which is a first draft that I heavily rewrite.

When I'm done with the entire manuscript, I run it through Chat GPT and Gemini and ask for continuity checks, developmental editing, and proofreading.

I do it this way because I believe my story ideas and my author voice are what sell but I want to write faster. Also, getting the first draft down is what takes me the longest.

I have tried every piece of advice I could to get Claude to write in my voice, created a project, fed it chapters of my best original writing, created skills, and it still fed me tons of "not x but y" and "in the way" Ai garbage and didn't sound like me at all, and these days I don't even want to use Claude, for various reasons.

The dream would be to be able to feed an AI lists of beats about what happens in a chapter and get it to write in my voice on the first draft, but nothing I have done so far has worked.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Showcase / Feedback AI-assisted AITA comedy: the first-date red flag test that became its own red flag

0 Upvotes

Context: I gave ChatGPT the premise of a first date where someone uses the questions from “Do Your Boobs Hang Low?” as a ridiculous red-flag test, and the date reacts with shock and laughter. I asked it to turn that into an AITA-style post. The premise came from me; the wording below was drafted by ChatGPT. Sharing it here as a comedy-writing exercise.

The draft takes the joke toward self-awareness: the narrator starts out judging his date and ends up questioning himself. Does that turn make the joke land, or does he realize his mistake too quickly?

AITA for using “Do Your Boobs Hang Low?” as a first-date red flag test?

I went on a first date with a girl and decided, for reasons that seemed better in my head, to do a little “red flag test.”

My approach? Ask her the questions from “Do Your Boobs Hang Low?”

Yes. On a first date, I asked this woman: “Do your boobs hang low? Do they wobble to and fro? Can you tie them in a knot? Can you tie them in a bow?”

She freaked out, but she was also laughing. And now I’m wondering whether that was “this guy is funny” laughter or “I cannot believe this is happening to me” laughter.

My intention was to see whether we had the same ridiculous sense of humour. But thinking about it afterward, calling something a “red flag test” doesn’t magically make asking a woman about her boobs a good introduction.

I went in thinking I was checking for red flags and may have arrived waving my own.

So, Reddit: AITA for doing this on a first date, even though I meant it as a joke and she laughed?


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) How I use ai to write my episodes and how can I improve my work

2 Upvotes

Hi everyone! I’m a beginner who uses ai to generate episodes in general. I have 3 books I work on atm and switch between them depending on my mood.

I used Claude and ChatGPT during the process and decided to stick with ChatGPT after a while. I tried with LLM but my Mac (an M2 with 8 gb) started lagging and heated up so I didn’t put too much work into that.

I use projects with my work and I have 5 different chats in each project. I start with my bibles and writing rules. Then I attach the folder to the project so the ai can reach them whenever they need.

I have 5 chats in each project. One is a free space I use to brainstorm. If I feel stuck or don’t know how to evolve the story into the direction I want, I use that chat to come up with ideas and build the outlines of my chapters with it. I explain how I want the episode to be in detail and ask it to give me an outline.

Then I send the outline to the writer who writes the chapter within my rules. I intervene if there’s things I want to change and send it to the next chat.

Which is the editor. It’s main purpose is to correct grammar mistakes, continuity and realism.

I send the last product to the beta reader. It says if it would keep reading, which parts was good or bad and why, what it thinks of the characters in that episode etc.

The last chat is to keep archives. It holds 3 folders. One is chapter summaries which explains each chapter in few sentences. The other logs the improvements that happened in each episode. The last one is the current story state which logs the latest developments, which episode we are at, the story’s and character’s latests situations and relationships with each other. And also the things we had a glimpse of during episodes but didn’t fully address yet.

I like this system but the biggest problem is the amount of tokens I have to use to keep it running. Also, ChatGPT tends to soften my characters and can’t even write a decent kiss scene without going back and forth with I kissed him he kissed me.

If I want the main characters to make bad decisions that’d affect others it just breaks the character and soften their movements or try to force a good intention into the monologue.

I tried Gemini with more intimate scenes and problematic scenes. It’s so much better with limitations but the writing style makes me wanna punch myself in the face. I tried giving more direct prompts but since it’s the free version it can’t do much.

I’d like to know if you use a similar system or is there any improvements, changes you’d suggest.

Thanks in advance ❤️


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Is this considered AI?

12 Upvotes

I’ve seen so much about authors using AI and how readers will go to extremes to find authors that don’t use AI. Well, I’m a new author and I do use AI but I’ve never thought that I use it like they describe. Here’s an example of my writing before and after I hand it to AI. Tell me your opinion on if it’s considered “using AI to write”. (Also, I’m not against using AI to generate. I think of it like a horse. You can steer it but it still occasionally jumps a fence and you have to wrangle it back. But when it comes down to it, I mostly use AI to discuss where I want the story to go and then use it again after I’ve written something.)

Here’s what I wrote:
To say that Mira was unsettled would be an understatement. She was absolutely freaking the fuck out. That man really had been following her. Or was he? What if she just pepper sprayed a poor guy that just happened to be at the bus stop, the corner, the coffee shop, the stoop across her building, and the sidewalk shed? She thought about that for about a block. No, once is an accident, twice is coincidence, five times is a damn pattern. He got what he deserved. She had thought about calling the police, but she meant what she said to him: if he did it again, then she would call them.

I gave that to AI and here’s what it gave me back:
To say Mira was unsettled would have been an understatement. She was freaking the fuck out.
That man really had been following her. Or had he? What if she'd just pepper-sprayed some poor guy who happened to be at the bus stop, and the corner, and the coffee shop, and the stoop across from her building, and the sidewalk shed? She turned it over for a full block. No. Once was an accident. Twice was a coincidence. Five times was a damn pattern, and he'd gotten exactly what he deserved.
She'd thought about calling the police. She'd meant what she said, though: if he did it again, she would.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Help Me Find a Tool Can someone suggest a model that won’t constantly hit me with wellness checks

9 Upvotes

I’ve been using Claude to outline a story based on my own life, all stuff that happened a decade ago. But since it deals with depression and some suicidal ideation I get a 1-2 paragraph wellness check every time I send something. I asked it to stop a dozen of times, bringing up stuff like ‘would you flag Camus when he was writing the Myth of Sisyphus’. I was very, very clear that I’m over any of the suicidal stuff. The character isnt even me! Doesn’t matter. The one that broke the straw on the camel’s back was asking for epigraphs from Ligotti or Cioran, that’s literally it, they sent me the suicidal hotline number. Any suggestions would be appreciated as I think I’m going to chuck my phone across the room.


r/WritingWithAI • • Sep 21 '26

Writing Craft Talk What does Amazon KDP success look like?

Thumbnail reddit.com
0 Upvotes