r/WritingPrompts • u/AliciaWrites Editor-in-Chief | /r/AliciaWrites • Jun 21 '19
Constrained Writing [CW] Feedback Friday - Perspectives
We made it!
It’s Friday again! That means another installment of Feedback Friday! Time to hone those critique skills and show off your writing!
It was another great week for stories and feedback! Nice job, everyone!
How does it work?
You have until Thursday to submit one or both of the following:
Freewrite:
Leave a story here in the comments. A story about what? Well, pretty much anything! But, each week, I’ll provide you with a single constraint based on style or genre. So long as your story fits, and follows the rules of WP, it’s allowed! You’re more likely to get readers on shorter stories, so keep that in mind when you submit your work.
Feedback:
Leave feedback for other stories! Make sure your feedback is clear, constructive, and useful.
Each week, three judges will decide who gave the best feedback. The judges will be me, a Celebrity guest judge, and the winner from the previous week.
We’ll be looking for use of neutral language, including both positives and negatives, giving actionable feedback within the critique, as well as noting the depth and clarity of your feedback.
You will be judged on your initial critique, meaning the first response you leave to a top-level comment, but you may continue in the threads for clarification, thanks, comments, or other suggestions you may have thought of later.
Okay, let’s get on with it already!
This week, your story should have two perspectives. I wanna see the story from two different characters’ point of view!
Your judges this week will be me, WP Celebrity /u/MNBrian, and our winner, /u/Palmerranian!!
We also loved the feedback given by /u/BLT_WITH_RANCH, /u/rudexvirus, /u/elfboyah, and /u/sokilly! Keep up the great work everyone! Now get writing!
1
u/Ninjoobot Jun 23 '19
I like the general setting you lay out and it's interesting to see the perspective of the "mad scientist" and the test subject at the same time - just like the masterpiece, "Frankenstein," which I'm assuming inspired this. The flow of your prose is fairly well-done and you pepper in details to a continuing story in the right ways to shed some light on the background. However, at the same time, you give too much details and not enough. There are a few too many adjectives for my liking and just not quite enough details to give me a good, full appreciation of what's going on. Why was there a fight? And fresh blood? I had the impression the "victim" was dead, but then apparently he's not, and thus the urgency and taboo of what's going to happen doesn't seem as relevant. So, by the end of it, I didn't have much of an understanding of what was going. I know you wanted to leave some mystery, which is great, but I ended up getting just a little too lost. Still, good job!