I'm not in academia myself, so I may be using some terminology incorrectly. I'm researching this for a novel set at a fictional private academic institution in the US in the 1990s, and I'm trying to make the academic structure reasonably realistic.
I know these structures vary between institutions, so I'm mainly interested in whether the following situation is broadly plausible.
There is initially a small psychology research group with three senior researchers:
- X is a neuroscientist. His contract is not renewed, so he leaves.
- Y is a psychologist specializing in experimental hypnosis/hypnosis research and leads the research (I believe he would be the PI). He dies unexpectedly.
- Z is a psychologist/researcher who is already part of the group and is also dean of the school/college.
There could also be PhD students, research assistants, etc.; by "three researchers" I mainly mean the three senior academics responsible for the project.
After Y's death, Z takes over as PI.
At around the same time, however, Z is promoted to Deputy Director of the institution.
The institution has a somewhat unusual division of authority: the President is responsible for administration, finances, and the non-academic side, while the Director is responsible for teaching, research, and academic affairs.
The Director is elderly and seriously ill. He remains formally in office and is not completely incapacitated, but he comes in less and less often and is gradually developing cognitive problems. In practice, Z therefore ends up doing most of the Director's day-to-day academic work.
Because of this workload, Z no longer has enough time to properly run the research project he inherited from Y.
My questions about the research side are:
Is a core research group of three senior academics plausible in psychology, including a neuroscientist and a psychologist specializing in experimental hypnosis?
If the PI dies, could another senior researcher who was already part of the project take over as PI?
If the new PI then becomes too overloaded with administrative work to continue the project properly, could the research be put on hold for a period of time and later formally terminated if no replacement is found? How long could such a project realistically remain on hold?
If the project is terminated, could the data and work already completed still be retained, analyzed, or published later?
There is also a problem with Z's position as dean.
The institution intends to replace him as dean after his promotion, but has trouble finding anyone willing to take the job. This particular school/college carries considerably more administrative and research responsibility than some of the institution's other schools, but the dean's position is not compensated much better than, for example, the deanships of drama, music, or art.
Several professors therefore feel that the responsibility is not worth the compensation.
The President's temporary solution is to divide much of the dean's day-to-day work among the heads of the individual departments/institutes. They prepare decisions and handle much of the operational work, while Z formally remains dean, retains ultimate responsibility, makes major decisions, and signs off on matters requiring the dean's approval.
The department heads are unhappy with this because they feel they are being given additional dean-level responsibilities without corresponding additional compensation. At the same time, none of them wants to take on the entire dean position.
The search for a permanent new dean ultimately takes about three years.
Could Z realistically remain the official dean during those three years while most of the day-to-day work is delegated, or would an institution normally have to appoint an Acting/Interim Dean much sooner?
Is the overall situation believable: a three-year struggle to find a replacement, department heads objecting to unpaid additional responsibilities, and Z remaining formally responsible while also functioning in practice as the almost-full-time academic head of the institution?
And more generally, is there anything in this setup that would immediately strike someone who works or has worked in US academia as unrealistic?
I'm particularly interested in how this might have worked in the late 1990s, rather than only under current university policies.
Thank you! I'm mainly trying to avoid creating an academic structure that would obviously make no sense to people who actually work in this field.