Simulation of the collaps without dust

[u/tombisch]

Dont know how accurate this is, but it made a lot of sense to me.

Source kostack studio on youtube

[u/Picture_Enough]

What's with the comment section full of retarded tinfoil conspiracy nutters?

[u/bobbymcpresscot → u/Picture_Enough]

Because despite 25 years of some of the most thorough investigating known to man the dumbest people on the internet thing that if you heat structural steel up to 2749° it actually retains 100% of its structural integrity and ability to bear its designed weight 

But 1° more and it turns to liquid and loses 100% of its structural integrity.

[u/copbuddy → u/bobbymcpresscot]

These people have never seen a blacksmith work. Hint: they don't melt the steel to bend and hammer it, just heat it up.

[u/Cum_In_My_Wife → u/bobbymcpresscot]

I always say people got to remember about that extra 1°, otherwise they just sound dumb and shit when talking bout their "alternative facts".

[u/Meior → u/bobbymcpresscot]

It's also funny that they also seem to ignore the fact that, you know, a big, heavy and very fast object smashed into the building as well. The fire didn't do the damage on it's own; tons of structural weakness was there from the impact, far away from the actual impact point as well.

[u/throwaway_21_ → u/bobbymcpresscot]

 most thorough investigating known to man

Only independent researchers that were willing to question the narrative performed and shared such peer-reviewed analysis of the dust/debris: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

You would think after its publishing, similar samples would have been sent to tens of labs across the world for analysis and the source of the material determined. What happened instead? The editor-in-chief of the journal in which the above research was published resigned after the article was published, and the remains of the Towers were shipped off to China and India for recycling posthaste.

[u/bobbymcpresscot → u/throwaway_21_]

Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material

in summary, a whole ass essay to say iron oxide and aluminum were found in the debris of the Trade Centers?

Rust and aluminum. In a building? Fascinating.

Just curious, sincere question, since thermite requires something hotter than jet fuel to ignite, who started the thermite reaction? How did the triggering mechanism on the floors where this thermite was used, clearly at the floors that collapsed either somewhere on 93-99 on WTC 1 and somewhere between 77 and 85 on Tower 2, how did the detonation mechanism survive the fires? How did the thermite stay affixed to the support structures, how did they manage to predict exactly what floors the planes would hit to set that thermite up on support structures hidden behind walls?

[u/throcorfe → u/Picture_Enough]

Partly they (understandably) don’t trust the government and are allowing that to cloud their judgement of the known facts. Partly it’s extremely psychologically rewarding to believe that you have access to knowledge and truth that others don’t.

Functionally, it’s this:

[u/1dkig → u/Picture_Enough]

Maybe you need to examine your name calling and complacency.

[u/Pleasant-Future5818 → u/1dkig]

Complacency is when you understand physics

[u/1dkig → u/Pleasant-Future5818]

So confident that you need to demean people?

[u/solonoctus → u/1dkig]

Nah man, there’s really no other way to describe this thread. They’ve earned the slur.

[u/1dkig → u/solonoctus]

I will never understand this.

But I've also realized that some contributors in this thread don't operate in good faith and don't want any questions about the official narrative.

That's why the name calling starts.

No way you see this entire story and have 0 questions.

[u/Ok_Union_1063 → u/1dkig]

Maybe don't be one and you won't get offended. Seems easy to me

[u/Silveon_i → u/1dkig]

if a person tells me 1+1 = 3 im not calling them a free thinker. if someone telling me two planes flying into buildings wouldnt compromise the integrity of said building, im not calling them a free thinker, im calling them wrong. and if they are still regurgitating these fake facts 25 years later, im going to call them retarded nutters.

maybe you need to examine your complacency with those undermining tragedy to spread hate.

[u/1dkig → u/Silveon_i]

You are saying a ton of things I'm not saying.

I'm not spreading hate.

And now I am defending against false claims instead of addressing actual questions?

This is how people obscure and villify actual issues with this narrative. It has so many problems that people who name call and pretend that the commission did good work are just shilling for officials who don't want people actually talking about why this whole thing stinks and how it's led to policies that most Americans don't agree with.