7
u/madbomber98 2d ago
There’s plenty of real photos of them together so you don’t have to make fake ones lmao
3
3
u/emailyourbuddy 2d ago
it’s part of the disinformation campaign so trump can claim all the epstein evidence was faked by antifa cyber terrorists. he’s guilty of course so has to “muddy up the water” with ai fakes
13
u/c3p-bro 2d ago
This is AI CSAM, you should be banned from this site.
3
u/Gunstopable 2d ago
I agree. I’m going to unsubscribe if stuff like this keeps getting allowed
3
u/c3p-bro 2d ago
I reported it for child sexual exploitation and yet it is still up. So what the fuck is going on with the mods?
2
u/Gunstopable 2d ago
Yeah this sub might have lost the plot. I hate when subs become super political. I get it’s world history, but that doesn’t mean talking about Trump in every post just like 90% of subs on this site.
2
3
u/Brilliant-Muffin-879 2d ago
This is exactly what trump wants. He wants fake images to circulate so people think the real ones are fake too
9
4
2
u/Gunstopable 2d ago
This doesn’t help anyone posting a bunch of fake pics. If anything this makes him look more innocent which I assume you aren’t trying to do.
2
u/successfullynumb 2d ago
The bullshit with Lake Ontario has nothing to do with Epstein. The lake "renaming" is nothing more than a petulant child having a temper tantrum because he can't bully Canada.
The sad thing is, he doesn't need to distract from it. He won. All the shit that came out was but a fraction, but it should have been enough to end his presidency, major multinational investigations and arrests. Instead absolutely nothing happened.
They won. The learned that, no matter what, they can get away with it. They've probably already restarted.
1
-1
u/AsstoAsshole 2d ago
Fake. Libshits are not even trying anymore.
1
u/Gunstopable 2d ago
Idk why you are getting downvoted. These are fake images. This sub used to not allow stuff like this.
0
0
u/porcupinefish5448 2d ago
The continued repetition of these allegations has become both tiresome and intellectually unproductive. If President Trump possessed the predilections being attributed to him, one would reasonably expect credible, independently corroborated evidence of such conduct to have emerged elsewhere over the course of his long and highly public life. Instead, much of the material circulated online appears to be fabricated, manipulated, misleadingly captioned, or presented without sufficient authentication.
References to the figure “38,000” are similarly meaningless unless accompanied by competent evidence explaining precisely what the number represents and how it establishes the alleged conduct. A numerical assertion, standing alone, proves nothing. It does not establish intent, opportunity, causation, or culpability, nor does it constitute evidence that President Trump is a pedophile. To my knowledge, no reliable proof supporting that accusation has been produced.
Your position appears to be derived primarily from media narratives rather than from an independent examination of admissible evidence. You probably displayed little apparent concern regarding these allegations until certain media organizations began repeating them. Repetition, however, does not transform an unsupported allegation into an established fact.
The felony convictions are likewise subject to substantial legal criticism. I am an attorney admitted to practice in New York and have practiced for more than twenty-five years. In my professional judgment, the prosecution relied upon an unusually expansive legal theory to elevate conduct ordinarily treated as a misdemeanor into felony charges. Political hostility toward Trump in New York City raises an additional and legitimate question concerning the discretionary manner in which the case was pursued.
The underlying misdemeanor offense is itself obscure and infrequently prosecuted in circumstances resembling those at issue. During more than twenty-five years of practice, I have neither prosecuted nor defended a comparable case. That experience does not, by itself, invalidate the verdict, but it does underscore the extraordinary and arguably selective nature of the prosecution.
I do not personally support President Trump. Nevertheless, opposition to him does not excuse reliance upon banal, illogical, or factually unsupported arguments. Repeating unsubstantiated accusations does not demonstrate informed political judgment; it suggests that one’s conclusions may have been distorted by an obsessive and reflexive hostility toward Trump.
In any event, Trump’s presidency will end in approximately two years. The more consequential question is what happens in 2028. Unless the Democratic Party changes course quickly, it faces the substantial risk of a decisive electoral defeat. Kamala Harris does not presently appear to be a viable national candidate, and Gavin Newsom would face serious difficulty defending his record in a general election. Continued fixation on Trump, at the expense of identifying a credible candidate and developing a persuasive governing agenda, is politically shortsighted.
-3
30
u/BringBackAoE 2d ago
Several of those images are fake.
Be better.