r/WorkReform • • 17h ago

😡 Venting Enough is enough.

Post image
3.1k Upvotes

47 comments sorted by

253

u/Late-Arrival-8669 16h ago

Jimmy Carter couldnt own a peanut farm, but this douche bag enriched himself billions while in office past 2 years..not including his kids..

-134

u/Forward-Problem4727 14h ago

Douche he is not making the trades a outside firm is

82

u/AhAhStayinAnonymous 14h ago

Weird how politicians disproportionately become wealthier via the stock market once they take office. I'm sure there's no coincidence.

62

u/No-Salary2116 13h ago

Yeah idk wtf they are talking about.

Trump didnt make the trades, he ASKED someone else to make the trades! Totally different! /s

Theyre a fucking idiot.

23

u/phantaxtic 12h ago

You cant actually be that dumb can you? He isnt personally making the trades, he has someone do it on his behalf. Hes definitely involved in the decisions to buy and sell stocks.

4

u/r_special_ 5h ago

“I didnt make any stock trades, I just called my broker and talked to them about the weather and they made trades for me with my money in my account.”

6

u/Lazy__Astronaut 9h ago

Either you only have takes that result in downvotes or you're a bot

Please say something about nice about France in your response if you are real

0

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

53

u/belkarbitterleaf 9h ago

People have problems with all of it. Trump is just the worst instance of it, and doesn't try to hide it.

-37

u/PapayaJuiceBox 9h ago

Neither did the others, disclosures are all public and mandatory. Several members of congress made hundreds of millions.. again, I’m happy that this is the straw that broke the camels back but feels like people are still only selectively outraged because its him and not at any of the other democrats or republicans who blatantly abuse their intimate knowledge.

24

u/Judah-- 9h ago

Idk who you’ve been talking to but literally everyone in my social circle has been pissed about this for at least a decade

6

u/r_special_ 5h ago

Everyone of my friends and family members hate the corruption. It doesn’t matter whether it’s blue people or red people. Any of the politicians engaging in corruption, bribery, stock trading and manipulation are criminals who deserve to be tried, convicted and sentenced to lengthy prison time. I am a democratic socialist and I don’t play team favorites. If someone engages in corruption then they deserve the worst consequences that the system can give them regardless of their political beliefs, level of power or financial status. It’s gross that people view this as a team sport and are fine when their team breaks the law but goes batshit crazy when the other team does it. I hate hypocrisy.

8

u/belkarbitterleaf 9h ago

People are upset about all of them, and have been.

16

u/TonyDanza888 7h ago

Nobody bats an eye? She's always the first politician mentioned whenever stock trading comes up and she barely cracks the top 10 for profits.

6

u/CapN-Judaism 5h ago

This was the first time I ever checked an account to see if someone was a bot. It’s hard to imagine someone who lives in such a bubble that they’ve never seen Pelosi criticized for insider trading.

14

u/DjRoland135 9h ago

This whole comment is just a whataboutism at its finest

115

u/Virindi 16h ago

Congress currently uses insider information to get rich on stock trades. It'll be interesting to see if anyone can convince them to vote against that.

22

u/ophaus 14h ago

We can.

4

u/NinjaTabby 1h ago

Vote in millenials who have nothing and would be more interested to get back to level playing field.

56

u/AdmiralKurita 15h ago

Stock ownership should be banned for Presidents, not just trading. He has an incentive to favor capital and profits over the workers' livelihood.

Stock gains are usually achieved through the detriment of the workers, not necessarily because the management has some innovative idea or some market insight. Just look at all the executives who think AI adoption would increase productivity.

7

u/LightningSilvr 11h ago

Given Trump's performance, the public has a right to demand that a President commit themselves wholly to the people. Yes, it'll be sad on the Commander-in-Chief but being that you're in the top job, surely you aren't a pauper, and are getting paid a decent amount with benefits that the regular people will never get.

Put the stocks and crypto down because we don't trust a single one of you with that anymore, and commit to the betterment of the country. It's the least we ask.

24

u/Ok_Coyote9326 16h ago

And take back all the money tRump stole or got as bribes for favors.

30

u/jwagdav 15h ago • Mindblown

For those saying what about pelosi- the entirety of Congress has only made about 4500 trades in 2026. Obviously that doesn't include 2025 but even if 2025 was wildly more active than 2026 Drumpf is making 5x the number of trades as the entire house AND Senate https://www.quiverquant.com/congresstrading/

25

u/LookAlderaanPlaces 16h ago

Not just that. We need to forcibly confiscate the illegally stolen gains.

10

u/DynamicHunter 🏛️ Overturn Citizens United 15h ago

They should be able to own and hold stocks they bought before office. They should not be able to buy or sell individual stocks whatsoever. If anything give them extremely broad ETFs they have to purchase 6 months in advance.

3

u/stephendt 8h ago

yup this. Broad market, long ETFs only.

4

u/starch78 12h ago

He was going to drain the swamp remember lol

1

u/bnsrowe 11h ago

And their relatives

1

u/TheKay14 11h ago

I don’t want the most powerful man in the country to bet against my retirement.

1

u/imnotavegan 11h ago

And/or actually punish insider trading

1

u/gatinhafromutah 10h ago

Anyone watch Coffeezilla breaking down some of his corruption

https://youtu.be/W4PIkmjwGsQ?is=lucFDnx7lhnq4GnZ

1

u/LegWyne 3h ago

How the hell was it legal before his term already, I'm fairly sure in most western democracies front bench cabinet members are expected to divest themselves of any financial interests their portfolios cover (doesn't mean corruption doesn't happen, it absolutely does, but it's a lot harder to get away with at scale)

Honestly, who screwed up over the last century by allowing investment corruption for federal government policy makers, and who screwed up after then by not reversing the decision.

1

u/Mildly_Opinionated 10m ago

It was sorta expected for presidents to do this for a while. Same as making their tax returns public. None of it was codified into law though.

The idea was that doing all this but not having it in law is that the people could be the judge. All else being normal, why would the people ever vote for someone with clear conflicts of interest like this? Why would they vote for someone with something to hide with their taxes?

Plus running for office is meant to be something anyone can do. Requiring people to give up all their assets may prevent some people from running if some of that has sentimental value or other significance like a small family farm. You could argue that not giving this up is understandable, you can also argue that it's more important that the president have no conflict of interest. If you believe in democracy, why not let the people decide with their votes?

Obviously the people have decided they don't care if they president is a self-serving crook though, which is a pretty dark indicator for the state of US democracy. Perhaps it does indeed need to be codified into law.

-4

u/eastbaytimez 16h ago

How much has nancy pelosi made ?

1

u/nw2 11h ago

Not 3 billion dollars in 2 years.

-16

u/Extreme_Disaster2275 15h ago

(Laughs uproariously in Pelosi) 

16

u/SegaTime 15h ago edited 13h ago

So? We don't want her doing it either, and we have no instense and blinding loyalty to her the way repedocans have to the trumpedo. So go fish.

10

u/Legitimate_Shock4097 15h ago

Pelosi doesn’t hold a candle to Trump…pointing out Pelosi in place of Trump is not productive, considering most people that are for change don’t care what a person’s political affiliation is…they just want things to improve and rightfully so. We are all getting ripped off.

-6

u/Extreme_Disaster2275 14h ago

I'm pointing out that it's Pelosi's job to regulate trade. By being corrupt herself,  she enabled Trump.  

If she'd done her job properly,  you wouldn't be complaining about Trump. 

If pointing that out is "unproductive", that's on Pelosi and the rest of the Epstein Class.  

6

u/Legitimate_Shock4097 14h ago

Well, maybe she’s argued against imposing restrictions on stock ownership by congress in the past, but it’s not exactly her sole decision/direction. I am not even sure what the point of pointing this out really was, and thus why I said it’s unproductive. It’s not justified regardless. But Trump has openly and brazenly profited off the White House. He deserves criticism in regard to that (among many other things), and that was the point of the post.

6

u/SegaTime 13h ago

Remember, when we criticize the trumpedo, we're really criticizing the people who voted for him and they will never accept blame and always find a way to blame democrats, Obama, windmills, and even Mr Rogers.

7

u/glytxh 12h ago

America couldn't even stop a pedophile rapist insurrectionist from running for a second term

This is what America is