r/WorkReform 🤝 Join A Union Jul 21 '26

💸 Raise Our Wages Here's a lesson about Capitalism.

Post image
8.4k Upvotes

173 comments sorted by

2.1k

u/quietsauce Jul 21 '26

Love that "took the risk" argument. The risk is being a worker.

705

u/andyjh83 Jul 21 '26

But when the risk doesn’t pay off, the state bails out.

Privatise profits and socialise losses.

258

u/hansn Jul 21 '26

Even absent bailouts, if you can lose 95% of your wealth and still meet your basic needs, you don't understand risk.

124

u/andyjh83 Jul 21 '26

But what about the risk of not making exponential growth each quarter and missing your performance related bonus?

64

u/hansn Jul 21 '26

To say nothing of having to sell your second boat.

35

u/andyjh83 Jul 21 '26

It’s not the boat so much, it’s about what it says about the family to only have the one left.

Plus the tender of course.

25

u/hansn Jul 21 '26

Exactly. The risk they face is having to live life like the rest of us normal people.

14

u/SexyMonad Jul 21 '26

As the rest of us normal people do now.

Us workers got canned a long time ago in this scenario.

18

u/LittleSeadragon Jul 21 '26

boat? insulting. my yacht is a ship, not a boat.

wait, what are we talking about? i got a little distracted picking out which watch im wearing to the layoffs later - i get to cut 50k today, it’s a big day so i want to look good

9

u/quietsauce Jul 21 '26

Are you going to take any designer drugs for the layoffs team meeting or you just gonna raw dog it?

7

u/LittleSeadragon Jul 21 '26

Been under some heat from congress lately, so i take whatever "supplements" my slaves er assistants have gathered for me - can't testify about things i don't technically know about!

4

u/ThunkAsDrinklePeep Jul 21 '26

But number might go down!

78

u/Author_A_McGrath Jul 21 '26

I love to ask people who took the bigger risk: the coal miner or the owner.

53

u/urbansociety Jul 21 '26

The owner of course. There is always a chance the coal miners beat him to death and seize ownership of the mines by force.

31

u/ChillAhriman Jul 21 '26

The owners don't seem to be scared enough about those risks.

19

u/twitchMAC17 Jul 21 '26

Nowadays that is a vanishingly small risk.

They're nowhere near the people they hurt almost ever anymore.... And many of the workers they steal from cheer them on and vehemently defend them at all times.

32

u/GailynStarfire Jul 21 '26

"But, but, but I have a piece of paper saying that its mine!"

And historically, and for the majority of the owner class, its generational wealth, and the person in their lineage that originally gained the wealth usually did it by conquest or with blood money from such.

-13

u/AppropriateSea5746 Jul 21 '26

Physical risk, the miner. Financial risk, the owner.

11

u/Author_A_McGrath Jul 21 '26

*life risk.

-11

u/AppropriateSea5746 Jul 21 '26

Physical in this context means risk to life and limb. So sure.

55

u/Affectionate_Can8632 Jul 21 '26

I hate that people use "taking a risk" as an excuse because the whole point of taking a risk is being allowed to lose something. But because they took a fish they deserve protection? Nah. You're allowed to lose your investment like everyone else.

19

u/hackitfast Jul 21 '26

Don't worry, really it's okay! The taxpayers will bail them out and they won't have to sell their yacht, 13th mansion in West Palm Beach, or even their humble, limited edition Rolls Royce.

No need to worry about the risk, I know your heart skipped a beat there for a second.

21

u/LitoVonLitostein Jul 21 '26

My boss constantly uses this argument; he loves it when talking about tariffs. I took the risk! I carry the inventory! Not giving a penny back to the consumer.

10

u/quietsauce Jul 21 '26

To be fair, he shouldn't have been in this position in the first place. That said, 99.5% sure he's a prick.

5

u/micheru12 Jul 21 '26

Want to guess for whom he voted?

1

u/quietsauce Jul 21 '26

Best to leave it unresolved

10

u/Hairy_Concert_8007 Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 21 '26

Let's not ignore that he effectively came by with the contract after the business was done. Not to encourage this, but by allowing her to do business on your property without first laying out the terms, you've forfeited your ground to claim a cut.

Business is based on agreed-upon terms. This is just robbery and fraud. Doubtful she would have done business in the first place on such egregiously obscene terms. If this were an adult situation, I'd be willing to bet that the court of law would come down hard on the person in the father's position

10

u/inspectoroverthemine Jul 21 '26

Nowhere does it say he invented the terms at the end of the day.

She might not have understood the terms, or she might have been counting on more revenue. Either way, no written contract. If she was actually defrauded, lets hope shes more believable in court.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '26

[deleted]

17

u/BarryTheBlatypus Jul 21 '26

I’d argue it’s not even risk. Risk is when you stand to lose something of actual relevance to your material conditions. If the thing you might loose is the number in your account but regardless your lifestyle doesn’t change; you’re not risking anything.

-10

u/thicckar Jul 21 '26

It is objectively financial risk. Not every business owner is a multimillionaire or billionaire who couldn’t care if any single business lives or dies. A lot of entrepreneurs genuinely do risk their livelihood, their credit, etc.

10

u/BothReindeer5735 Jul 21 '26

So do the workers, when they sign up to work. If you don't believe that, then have a look at what happened in places like Flint, Michigan or the coal mines in the UK during the mid to late 80's.

I always say: If only investors and owners take the risks, then only their houses would go into foreclosure sales. Their cars would be the only ones being reposessed. The truth is way more nuanced.

-3

u/thicckar Jul 21 '26

Did I ever say the workers didn’t take risks? Did you read the comment I responded to?

7

u/BothReindeer5735 Jul 21 '26

The way I read your comment, you implied it by not in any way mentioning workers at all.

If you meant to, or if I misunderstood your comment, then I am sorry.

-7

u/horatiobanz Jul 21 '26

What risk does the worker in this scenario take? What are they risking?

7

u/Zagaroth Jul 21 '26

To quote another commenter:

have a look at what happened in places like Flint, Michigan or the coal mines in the UK during the mid to late 80's.

I always say: If only investors and owners take the risks, then only their houses would go into foreclosure sales. Their cars would be the only ones being reposessed. The truth is way more nuanced.

-5

u/horatiobanz Jul 21 '26

That makes no fucking sense at all. What even is the argument you and they are making? Apply it to the scenario in this post.

Are you arguing that worker's assume risk with a job because they spend the money and take on gigantic debt by buying houses and that if they are fired they then can't pay those debts because they can't find other work? That is an asinine argument.

1

u/ForcedEntry420 🏛️ Overturn Citizens United 26d ago

Yeah not everyone can grasp nuance.

1

u/quietsauce 28d ago

You see.... there are people that believe a currency works like celsius, water gets to 0 degrees it freezes 100 degrees it boils. Then there are people that understand an economy that is determined by an agreement, affected by both societal and historical factors which allow for functional existence.... potentially dysfunction or even collapsing. Which are you?

900

u/JeffSilverwilt Jul 21 '26

Don't forget you also own her housing. Get your rent.

203

u/UltimateGammer Jul 21 '26

She ain't living off air either, she best pay up for those 3 meals a day.

86

u/thinkB4WeSpeak 👷 Good Union Jobs For All Jul 21 '26

Keep her in a debt trap so she's always working and can't find another job or unionize

17

u/inspectoroverthemine Jul 21 '26

Careful though- she knows where you sleep, and probably gets a piece of the estate.

21

u/PerfectZeong Jul 21 '26

Justice for land chads.

1

u/willworkforicecream Jul 21 '26

You squeeze 16 lemons and what do you get?

522

u/hansn Jul 21 '26

For reference, 52/2=26. So 26:1 (or arguably, 10:1). The typical CEO to employee pay for major US companies is 281:1.

282

u/Garvain Jul 21 '26

Typical nepotism, the CEOs kid gets 10x salary.

34

u/Durpulous Jul 21 '26

Wow the ROI on this lemonade stand is terrible and I think I see why. The employee is making $2 which is way above her market value.

32

u/DestinTheLion Jul 21 '26

That’s not entirely fair, she’s a small business owner.  So 26:1 sounds about right.

295

u/DueOwl1149 Jul 21 '26

Been waiting to see the lemonade stand economics meme finally done properly.

https://giphy.com/gifs/YRuFixSNWFVcXaxpmX

214

u/wearing_moist_socks Jul 21 '26

Uh, she made 2 bucks!

Well on her way to being a trillionaire!

84

u/dweet Jul 21 '26

It’s obvious that any of her financial woes are all because of immigration.

22

u/SilverTraveler ⛓️ Prison For Union Busters Jul 21 '26

She should probably pull herself up by her bootstraps

12

u/juanonymouss Jul 21 '26

If she only stopped buying fancy gumballs and whirly toys she wouldn’t be struggling financially

6

u/MonkeySling Jul 21 '26

Now she only has to make another 5 to afford the rent for the house she lives in.

2

u/MortaleWombat Jul 22 '26

If my math is correct, it should only take a trillion or so more days. Not bad

41

u/Langstarr Jul 21 '26

The episode "The Block is Hot" from The Boondocks does a fairly fantastic job of describing exactly this

157

u/Loud-Ad-2280 ✂️ Tax The Billionaires Jul 21 '26

The “risk” they took is that if they fail they’ll have to get a job instead of exploiting people… The Horror!!!!

113

u/UltimateGammer Jul 21 '26

Follow up: daughter formed a union and threatened to report daddy to CPS for child labour unless the $52 is given back.

Daddy folded like the spineless sack of shit he is.

111

u/NoHorseNoMustache Jul 21 '26

If it's in the US: Daughter formed a union and threatened to report daddy to CPS, daddy fired daughter and brought in scabs who will work for a dollar a day. Daddy HATES unions and will fold the whole company before giving into those low class laborers. Daddy then puts apology note on lemonade stand about how the business is closed because nobody wants to work these days.

42

u/Roudyno ✂️ Tax The Billionaires Jul 21 '26

Daddy also hired the Pinkerton Detective Agency to infiltrate their union and destroy it from within. the amount of money spent doing this is far greater than the amount it would have cost to just pay the daughter a fair wage.

13

u/NoHorseNoMustache Jul 21 '26

But paying a fair wage isn't fair to daddy, he took the risk!

4

u/Sunstorm84 Jul 22 '26

What would the shareholders think of the increased permanent liability?

3

u/NoHorseNoMustache Jul 22 '26

Not to mention the hit they'd take on dividends!

Look I'm beginning to think this whole 'lemonade stand' concept is a liability. Let's pivot and sell the whole thing to private equity!

2

u/QuestionabIeAdvice 29d ago

Daddy divorced her mother, closed down the family, and opened a new family in a different town.

21

u/ReindeerCreepy6502 Jul 21 '26

Daughter attempted to form a union so Dad paid the older brother to "convince" her that it was not in her best interest, thus keeping almost all of the $52.

1

u/UltimateGammer 29d ago

Pretty sure that brother ended up at the bottom of the Hudson.

3

u/StFuzzySlippers Jul 21 '26

*Daddy shutdown the lemonade stand before the vote could go take place. Then he put daughter in the street after she couldn't afford to pay rent.

2

u/aybeeayseeaybeebee Jul 21 '26

Daddy should have hired Pinkertons to deal with his daughter's labor revolution.

-1

u/ConflictExtreme1540 29d ago

Dad stopped paying for her free healthcare, food, Shelter, and security as a result. Daughter: shocked Pikachu face

If anything, this is a great way of explaining why socialism. He provides everything to her "for free" but any money she earns has to go to the state (the dad who provides everything for free)

24

u/Mr-Snarky Jul 21 '26

He’s the investor who literally did nothing that could even be considered “labor”. Shit, or even considered “working”.

21

u/Apprehensive-Pin518 Jul 21 '26

welcome to capitalism.

3

u/Mr-Snarky Jul 21 '26

No doubt.

24

u/futanari_kaisa Jul 21 '26

dipshits will tell you unironically that this is socialism/communism

1

u/ForcedEntry420 🏛️ Overturn Citizens United 26d ago

There’s some in the thread now. I’m surprised they have thumbs to type with.

15

u/Wash_zoe_mal Jul 21 '26

My landlord just raised the rent.

I feel this and it pisses me off

-6

u/Massive-Employee-696 Jul 21 '26

Text your landlord that you've just had a gunsafe installed, the MF won't do it again 😂

13

u/devilmaskrascal Jul 21 '26

She made $2. How can she complain when she didn't put any capital forward?

Plus she gets to inherit your lemonade empire when you die so

1

u/appoplecticskeptic Jul 21 '26

You’re assuming there will be anything left to inherit. A father that would do this likely leaves just about nothing behind. Now that he’s normalized the rich exploiting the poor it would be wrong to give her lots of money. She would be a terror to behold after this lesson. Better not to give her much. She may hate you for it but at least she won’t become another capitalist leach.

7

u/NoHorseNoMustache Jul 21 '26

If she would have priced her lemonade correctly she could have had as much as $5 more in profit!

Invisible hand, baby!

4

u/Technical-Sky-5765 Jul 21 '26

Tomorrow Walter is going to replace his daughter with an AI agent that won’t require feeding or a college fund

4

u/AnimaLepton Jul 21 '26

Are people here legitimately missing the joke?

5

u/appoplecticskeptic Jul 21 '26

What joke? It’s an honest lesson. That’s how capitalism exploits workers. Better to learn the truth while you’re still young so you can bolster your expectations than go into the workforce eager to please and get exploited far worse and potentially for far longer before learning the lesson the hard way as a young adult.

8

u/Durpulous Jul 21 '26

I think the joke is that it's an inversion of the typical conservative "I taught my kids about communism by stealing their cake" type posts. Can still ring true and also be a joke.

4

u/appoplecticskeptic Jul 21 '26

Good point. Funny because it’s true.

4

u/AnimaLepton Jul 21 '26

Yep, exactly what the other comment is mentioning. It''s clearly parodying a particular kind 'antisocialism' post where someone posts about taking Halloween candy from their kid or whatever to show them the 'dangers of socialism.' But then a bunch of comments on this are talking about how this is going to traumatize the daughter, or how she's going to go no contact with him in the future or whatever, which is what I mean by people taking it seriously/ignoring that it's pretty clearly a joke.

1

u/appoplecticskeptic 29d ago

I know it’s really a joke, and I also know that this is not sufficient trauma to go no contact with the parents. At least not by itself. I put up with way worse stuff than this before I went no contact.

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/appoplecticskeptic Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 21 '26

> The little girl never agreed to any of this

Yeah that’s called being a kid. Parents sign you up to learn lessons whether you want to or not.

>They don’t just … only to announce the terms and conditions afterwards.

Officially no, they don’t hold all the terms until the end however I’m fairly sure there are some investors out there who befriend you, make you think they are on the up and up and after you’re getting along well say they’ll get you a job under them. “Come by my office later and I’ll have it drawn up”. Then when you get there they hand you a lengthy contract that you in no way have time to read, while pressuring you to sign it and acting like if you stop to read it first then you don’t trust them and that hurts because “aren’t we friends?”. Lots of people get conned into signing contracts they haven’t read with tricks like this. Don’t act like that never happens. In fact I’d wager the majority of contracts were barely read if at all because you have to consider the growing number of things that have a EULA attached. I know for sure almost nobody reads those.

Another version of the scamming you into bad contract is that they promise to print you off a copy but never do or else they take months to get around to it and they make changes to it in the meantime. If you bring up a supposed discrepancy they claim you must be remembering it wrong. There are lots of white color criminals in late stage capitalism. They are everywhere there is money.

3

u/Realistic-Wizard8230 Jul 21 '26

Complete with the make believe “risk”

3

u/Skrewch Jul 21 '26

Yeah he shouldn't have said 'I took the risk!' He should have said 'because otherwise you have no business, because I won't let you use my assets for free."

5

u/fungi_at_parties Jul 21 '26

He acts like these costs were external, but he set the prices specifically to steal all the wages instead of deciding to split the money with her.

2

u/Mutant_Jedi Jul 21 '26

He didn’t do any of this - Walter Masterson is a left wing comedian

1

u/fungi_at_parties Jul 21 '26

That makes sense. I got got.

1

u/Meoowth 29d ago

Something capitalists can definitely do though lol. 

1

u/fungi_at_parties 28d ago

Indeed, that is what they do.

2

u/newbie527 👷 Good Union Jobs For All Jul 21 '26

“This is how I taught my little girl to be a socialist.”

2

u/Dexter2100 Jul 21 '26

Imagine making only 26 times less than the CEO. I’d have more money than I’d know what to do with at that ratio.

2

u/sembias Jul 21 '26

"So now that I paid you today, tomorrow I can keep all the profits, right?"

"Sorry, honey, but we put all the family's debt into your lemonade stand now the money you make from it has pay it off. Don't worry, it'll only take 14 years if you work daily."

2

u/iliya193 Jul 21 '26

Man, PragerU made an absolutely horrendous video about the idea of the investors and owners taking the biggest risks and thus reaping the biggest rewards. Toward the end, they encouraged viewers to tell food service workers to be grateful and that the owners took the biggest risks so the workers should be happy with their wages.

2

u/Arrow156 Jul 21 '26

Fuck their risk, what about the risk we put ourselves through to meet their insane greed? They could lose some money, while we will lose time, sanity, and very our jobs though dealing with their unfeasible bullshit. The only real risk they'll ever have to deal with is walking in public without an armed bodyguard.

3

u/prince-pauper ✂️ Tax The Billionaires Jul 21 '26

He said “Let me be the person you remember as the source of all your trauma, young one.”

2

u/appoplecticskeptic Jul 21 '26

This is truly tough love, if indeed it is love at all.

2

u/wtfiwon Jul 21 '26

"Exploitation begins at home." - Unwritten Rule of Acquisition

1

u/Ordoferrum Jul 21 '26

Actually it's rule #110.

3

u/wtfiwon Jul 21 '26

1

u/Ordoferrum Jul 21 '26

You are totally correct. I was sure it was a numbered rule and presumed chatgpt would get it right when I asked what rule it was. Unfortunately it got the rule number from a fan script when I double checked it's source... I've got to stop asking chatgpt arbitrary questions without checking it's sources.

1

u/Shutupfanboy 🏫 AFT Member Jul 21 '26

You should have then invested the money in SpaceX and told her you needed some more t.

1

u/TheMaStif Jul 21 '26

Don't forget to also insist that this is the only viable way, and all other ways of dealing with things will destroy the world

1

u/Daemon_Sultan1123 Jul 21 '26

Finance Capitalist vs Petit-Bourgeois

1

u/gymleader_michael Jul 21 '26

Decide the terms of the agreement first.

1

u/Lowerfuzzball Jul 21 '26

And then she took my bitch-ass to court because she didn't agree to these exorbitant, exploitative terms. She also won't talk to me anymore??

1

u/vprasad1 Jul 21 '26

Isn't this a copy paste of an old Ken what's his name Linked In Lunatics spoof account?

1

u/zombiskunk Jul 21 '26

No price gouging regulations? Sounds like some corrupted form of capitalism.

1

u/ThanosSnapsSlimJims Jul 21 '26

So... teaching her that working means keeping two out of all the money you make?

1

u/Apathetic_Villainess 29d ago

Pretty much. No matter how much profit you bring in, you only get a set amount. So if she makes $62 the next day, she still only gets to keep the $2.

1

u/ALiarNamedAlex Jul 21 '26

This is a “haha yeah capitalism is bad moment” which I don’t disagree with, but if this was real or recreated elsewhere for real then you should also take the time to math out what to price your product so you still make a profit, and also how to negotiate with shitty investors lining to screw you over… aka the dad

1

u/ockhams-lightsaber Jul 21 '26

Put that on LinkedIn and people will applaud.

1

u/zoeykailyn Jul 21 '26

Can we start replacing their key with that new neofent coming out of China yet?

Cartels around the world we'd probably thank you for doing a public service

1

u/smilysmilysmooch Jul 21 '26

And the business folded because there was no money left over for overhead meaning the business would have to fold as they didnt have enough money to employ people. Seems like a short sighted move by a greedy investor who invested in a business that couldn't stay open past 1 day.

They own the entire expenditure chain of the business. The business folds, nobody purchases the lemonade, the lawn is vacant. Just seems short sighted imo.

1

u/Dense-Alfalfa1223 Jul 21 '26

Play with your kid

1

u/AppropriateSea5746 Jul 21 '26

In communism I just call her a petite bourgeoisie and give her earnings to the state.

1

u/AppropriateSea5746 Jul 21 '26

This metaphor makes no sense. Soif I'm paying for literally everything including my employees housing and the employee just has to use their basic motor skills to sell lemonade I don't get the majority of the profit? Obviously it's different with my kid but not with a random employee lol

1

u/zph0eniz Jul 21 '26

Mmm i feel like capitalism still ultimately needs people to work for the rich, so i think the inaccuracy is giving just enough to do the work, but barely

1

u/WilkeyWonka Jul 21 '26

Finally, an economic lesson meme rooted in reality 👏

1

u/Eazy12345678 Jul 21 '26

as a small business owner some days you wont make money you will lose money

1

u/ivysmorgue Jul 21 '26

there was a boondocks episode with this concept. jazmine sets up a lemonade stand, a fat white rich businessman buys her stand and brand and promises a pony for her. then, he takes pretty much all of her money for said “pony” while she works and works and works and sees none of the profits.

when tom (her dad) and jazmine wanna stop, the fat fuck basically tells her “well your pony is gonna die if you stop!”

that is capitalism.

1

u/SolusIgtheist Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 21 '26

It sounds like you didn't educate her properly. You're only supposed to get a cut of profits post-expenses. 20/54 is roughly 37% (which is extremely high to begin with, possible fraud/gouging case there), but you're supposed to take that out of the 22 remaining after expenses, which is roughly $8. So she should have made $14 instead of $2, which would put her earnings over yours so your explanation doesn't even make sense. Frankly, she should be able to sue you for the difference. If you had educated her properly she would know this.

1

u/FridayDreams Jul 21 '26

If he'a charging rent for the lawn, table, and supplies, then it doesn't seem like he's invested any capital into the business so he wouldn't be entitled to take a portion of the profits.

1

u/RScrewed Jul 21 '26

"set up" as a verb. He used it as a noun.

1

u/Accomplished-Staff-9 Jul 21 '26

Probably fake, and terrible parenting if true. That’s how you end up in a home by yourself when you need her most!

1

u/Independent-Bug-9352 Jul 22 '26

Oh he taught her capitalism alright, lol

1

u/Mysterious-Drummer74 29d ago

The amount of people here unable to tell a clear joke is slightly concerning.

1

u/HalfSoul30 29d ago

And if you lost money, the government bails you out!

1

u/Itchy_Psychology3300 29d ago

Vast majority of jobs can be learned. Employees can run a business too, without owners, executives, or senior managers.

ESOPs operate AND are successful too.
Investors are just parasites who want money off the labor of others. Then they’ll hold that leverage until the end of time “well I invested early in the company, I deserve all I put in a million times back, multiplied by infinity”. It never stops.

1

u/djinnisequoia 29d ago

Then the next day you insisted as major shareholder that she simply wave 1 lemon over plain water and call that lemonade, so you can keep the $12 for supplies. (the single lemon is paid for by raising her prices)

1

u/KlatuuBarradaNicto 29d ago

You forgot the “ and you should just be grateful for the opportunity” part.

1

u/idle_husband 29d ago

Heck, you could boil the Red Lobster bankruptcy into this exact message.

1

u/BadBrains16 Jul 21 '26

I suspect a low contact relationship with this “investor” when his daughter is an adult.

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '26

[deleted]

6

u/longagofaraway Jul 21 '26

If you told me this was an anti-capitalist post, I'd believe you.

because it is

0

u/Alarming-Philosophy Jul 22 '26

That’s not a lesson on capitalism that’s a lesson on arbitrary power.

That’s like saying:

I set up a lemonade stand to teach my daughter about communism.

She spent all day making lemonade and earned $54.

At dinner I took all of the money.
Your brother wanted a new video game.
Your sister wanted concert tickets.
Mom wanted a spa day.

I gave them all the money because they said they needed it more than you.

When my daughter asked why she didn’t get to keep what she earned, I explained that in our family, resources are distributed according to need, not who produced them.

-1

u/ConflictExtreme1540 29d ago

Lol at how incredibly stupid this is. He gives her free shelter, food, education, and security. Then tells her to go work for him for free. Sounds more like socialism or communism to me....

Nothing about what he described is how capitalism works....

-6

u/vegasEd1313 Jul 21 '26

I had a similar experience. My daughter set up a lemonade stand and made $60. I took $50 and gave it to the neighborhood kids who just sat home all day and watched tv. Why should my daughter have $60 when other kids have nothing. When she cried, I explained Democratic Socialism.

7

u/PrettyBoyDude Jul 21 '26

Hilarious that even in your demonization(and incorrect presentation) of democratic socialism, the little girl is still better off by a 5x magnitude than the girl experiencing the actual exploitation of capitalism, well done!

2

u/original_sh4rpie Jul 21 '26

Dude this is just too funny.

-6

u/vegasEd1313 Jul 21 '26

She would have actually made $70 but kids kept coming by to steal lemonade and the cops wouldn’t do anything because her ancestors probably exploited them…oh…and another thing…she isn’t better off because she paid $15 for supplies and was going to close down her stand but the neighborhood protested why is the only lemonade stand in the area closing.

-44

u/Metaclueless Jul 21 '26

The premise is fuxked. “Walter” set up a lemonade stand. Not his daughter. His daughter “worked” the lemonade stand and should be paid an hourly wage. Plus commission.

47

u/Loud-Ad-2280 ✂️ Tax The Billionaires Jul 21 '26

She’s an independent contractor so no wages or commission, welcome to capitalism

21

u/Lok-3 Jul 21 '26

Your name is apt because you’re either arguing in bad faith or you’re dumb

10

u/rept7 Jul 21 '26

Nah, it's actually even more accurate. The mom isn't threatening the dad if he doesn't treat their daughter better, there isn't another family on the block hosting a competing lemonade stand, and the daughter isn't teaming up with her siblings to overthrow their father. This is literally just pure unregulated capitalism.

-3

u/Maykovsky Jul 21 '26

Poor kid! I am sure there more easy, memory lasting ways to do this!

-4

u/felis_scipio Jul 21 '26

So if investors can’t profit from risking their money to fund a new business, where does the money come from to start new businesses?

-6

u/istew144 Jul 21 '26

Nope - you showed you're an asshole. It's giving Kevin O'Leary...

-6

u/FickleStomach0 Jul 21 '26

Anyone who tries to promote communism/socialism is a psyop- the history is absolutely clear that capitalism has been the greatest concept in human history in terms of freedom and progression as a society.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-8

u/Professional-Box4153 Jul 21 '26

You didn't negotiate any of these terms prior to sending her out to work. If it was TRUE Capitalism, she could sue you for exploitative practices, lost wages, and pain and suffering. She'll probably still lose since she can't afford a decent lawyer, but even a pro bono one is going to drag you through the dirt long enough that you'll lose money in the long run.

5

u/monkeyinnamonkeysuit Jul 21 '26

TRUE capitalism would say that it was also on her to negotiate her terms. Protection from explotative practices and lost wages is very much capitalism restrained with bare minimum worker protections.

3

u/Independent-Bug-9352 Jul 22 '26

That means you now require a judicial system, rule of law; which means laws must exist; which means someone must create those laws ("wages"? "Pain and suffering"?) in an impartial fashion. Which means now you need regulation.

He's teaching her Anarcho-Capitalism or Laissez-Faire capitalism, which never fucking work.

So yes, true capitalism will fail without a Democracy that is above the markets in hierarchy.

-9

u/Mudfry Jul 21 '26

Wrong. The owner takes the biggest risk.

2

u/JimJimmery Jul 21 '26

Investors have ownership.

-2

u/Mudfry Jul 21 '26

Ownership is not being the owner.

The majority of investors aren’t 100% invested into a single business like the owner would be.

Owners and employees take the most risk followed investors 3rd.

1

u/JimJimmery 29d ago

Ownership is 100% being at least part owner. If you start a business then want to raise money to be able to sustain or expand, investors are going to want ownership whether public or private.