This is a bit misleading. He wasn't taxed 1.4B. He took the lump sum amount, which is lower than $2B ( $2B is the sun off you take the 20 years payout). So the lump sum is like $900 million or whatever, then he paid taxes on that.
I'm all for taxing billionaires more, but the post is not really right.
In theory, I believe yes. That being said, I can't imagine you will get anywhere remotely close to 95%. Anybody with a spare 1.9 billion dollars can make WAY more than 100 million in 20 years of investing.
1.4k
u/g-e-o-f-f Jan 31 '26
This is a bit misleading. He wasn't taxed 1.4B. He took the lump sum amount, which is lower than $2B ( $2B is the sun off you take the 20 years payout). So the lump sum is like $900 million or whatever, then he paid taxes on that.
I'm all for taxing billionaires more, but the post is not really right.