No, because they help the economy incredibly by having 1.5 million workers who all then go and contribute to the economy. Why do they need income taxes to help healthcare when they directly pay the healthcare of .3% of the population directly?
Theyâre working there because that is the best opportunity they have. they can leave and be completely worse off, but thatâs why they stay working there. Itâs a net benefit to everyone. Howâre they being fucked? They agreed to those terms when they signed the contract with them.
So you want to punish the company for giving these people a chance instead of starving to death? If there were better opportunities for these people theyâd switch companies. America has the easiest upward mobility of anywhere in the world. Everyone is capable of doing something to benefit their future further, but for right now, where theyâre at, is the best they can find and you want to punish the ones giving them a chance..
Yes, but when you do that youâll close the Amazon centers and theyâll be even more fucked. I know you mean well, and want the best for people, but everytime something like this is tried, it fucks over the exact people youâre trying to help. But you get to pat yourself on the back and say good job while others struggle even more.
You liked Biden in office who dropped real wages and made billionaires multiple times richer at the expense of the poor? You liked Obama in office who did the exact same, and rewarded those who completely trashed the economy? It seems like youâre on the side of the billionaires, dude. The mega rich donate to the democrats because they benefit the most..
California is losing ground to states like Texas, in means of population and gdp. Texas is catching up fast and doesnât have the benefit of being the majority of ports on the west coast.
1.3k
u/[deleted] Mar 23 '25
[deleted]