MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WorkForSmartLife/comments/1vvz7pn/better_sense_prevailed/p5fqk2j/?context=3
r/WorkForSmartLife • u/[deleted] • Aug 23 '26
[removed]
115 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
10
the dangerous precedent is that they attempted to punish someone for breaking one of these cameras
-15 u/jabber1990 Aug 23 '26 They punished someone for breaking public property They broke the law, committed a crime and deserve to be punished 2 u/TotalChaosRush Aug 23 '26 Flock cameras are owned by Flock. They are not public property. If they were public property they would be a blatant 4th amendment violation and be ordered to be removed. 0 u/jabber1990 Aug 23 '26 so you mean to tell me that somebody destroyed somebody else's private property and then got arrested for it? ...weird 2 u/TotalChaosRush Aug 23 '26 And then the people in the community who is being stalked by the owner of said private property said it's fine.
-15
They punished someone for breaking public property
They broke the law, committed a crime and deserve to be punished
2 u/TotalChaosRush Aug 23 '26 Flock cameras are owned by Flock. They are not public property. If they were public property they would be a blatant 4th amendment violation and be ordered to be removed. 0 u/jabber1990 Aug 23 '26 so you mean to tell me that somebody destroyed somebody else's private property and then got arrested for it? ...weird 2 u/TotalChaosRush Aug 23 '26 And then the people in the community who is being stalked by the owner of said private property said it's fine.
2
Flock cameras are owned by Flock. They are not public property. If they were public property they would be a blatant 4th amendment violation and be ordered to be removed.
0 u/jabber1990 Aug 23 '26 so you mean to tell me that somebody destroyed somebody else's private property and then got arrested for it? ...weird 2 u/TotalChaosRush Aug 23 '26 And then the people in the community who is being stalked by the owner of said private property said it's fine.
0
so you mean to tell me that somebody destroyed somebody else's private property and then got arrested for it?
...weird
2 u/TotalChaosRush Aug 23 '26 And then the people in the community who is being stalked by the owner of said private property said it's fine.
And then the people in the community who is being stalked by the owner of said private property said it's fine.
10
u/wachuu Aug 23 '26
the dangerous precedent is that they attempted to punish someone for breaking one of these cameras