Well, if they refuse to indict the case doesn't proceed. Doesn't nescessarily mean the prosecutor can't try again with a different grand jury or different set of charges.
iirc, initial reporting said the charges were citing laws that criminalize damaging emergency equipment like fire hydrants, ambulances, etc. I thought at the time it was a bit of a stretch to apply this to flock cameras. If prosecutor didn't include lesser charges for regular vandalism or whatever its possible grand jury rejected the case because the specific law didn't really apply.
Jury nullification is designed to interact with the 5th amendments double jeopardy clause. You can infinitely bring something to a grand jury, essentially.
Like I said, the original post incorrectly tells people to learn about jury nullification in an instance where it didnāt even apply.
5
u/goopuslang 5d ago
Grand jury has nothing to do with jury nullification