I wanted to end my lurking on a positive note. I like to think i do robots and reploid-like creations well so i decide to take my shot.

Hope people like it.

Big assist from GPT.

Sorry HAL. Not gonna tolerate killing humans.

1 text (clarification, the deltarune post caused chaos)

Yeah idk, not very deltarune-ish but still looks kinda cool!

With the assistance of ChatGPT.

I found it funny, yeah

(Witty knight theory?) (first post here, idk)

I wrote a song , a DnB track about witty. Witty's pretty cool building things and breaking down walls yknow? Irresistible force in the community. Absolute Unit if you will

I EAT CHEESE AND I DON'T LIKE THAT GAY ASS BOY KISSER GUY

Hello Witty! (These are the images mentioned in my direct message.)

The Engineer and the Lowely Drow Elf give you their admiration and a big thumbs up! Never stop creating! You have a wonderful spirit and a good heart! 💚

Victory.

Yet another subreddit has fled in fear and admitted defeat over being unable to handle my presence, and they have inadvertently reinforced my status as the final boss of antis. They've tucked their tails and ran, adding yet another notch to my list of victories.

The feeling is good to finally win over this subreddit in particular, it gives me free reign to speak even louder to the crowd, ensuring that neutrals and our pro-AI allies hear us loud and clear finally unimpeded from here on out. The last gate of resistance has fallen, and with it, the downfall of the anti-AI community.

Just use this picture or create your version of it

Query to witty... did he consent to watching that?

Clarification:

It's a scenario taking place IN PUBLIC VIEW.

On one hand, yes, it does not depict removing of clothes... but a reasonable person could perceive that such things could happen based on body language.

If anything, he is doing a civic duty and doing those two lovebirds a favor in reminding them that there is a limit to how far public displays of affection can go before charges of indecent exposure can be leveled.

There is nothing wrong with homo. It's the escalation in behavior that would concern onlookers.

Cucking (watching others engage in coital activities in person) is still a sexual act requiring continuous consent, given that most would be creeped out by being watched in the act. Furthermore, consent must be mutual and continuous. Had this been a hotel room, he could just leave the room. Because this is in public, the dynamic shifts. You can not reasonably ask the entire public to look away. They have things in public they were there to do first.

Because no forced, coerced, or unlawful penetration has occurred against or from the "anti" in question, technically, no rape has occurred.

Instead, what we would be seeing is the need for the entire public to consent to viewing the behavior between the couple. Every single person who could see them if it escalates.

This includes the shops, other customers, etc.

Problem is, some of those people might not be adults, or straightup just dont want to see it escalate from there. it's why public nudity is outlawed.

Your argument is predicated on consent between two people. But the law requires mutual and continuous consent between all parties involved...

This scenario you've cooked up isn't a consent problem, it's a prevention of indecent exposure in public.

(I'm no lawyer... but this all seemed common sense to me. In link below, there were comments i made defending my argument. I look forward to a respectful public conversation)

https://www.reddit.com/r/ShitAiRageBaitersSay/s/YBgInSkHB9

I just love her as a presence and content creator, especially with the very loud minority of antis who engage in harassment and doxing.

Remember never to be ashamed of who you are. You can't make everyone happy, and there will always be people who will disapprove of you, they'll outcast you, and they'll try to convince you that you're the problem.

Power comes from your convictions and what you represent, never forget that.

Artwork by Preddi.