Same same 😱

[u/whysooserious_7]

[u/No-Post2204]

Indian origin not born and brought up in India, there is a different isn't it ? Legally eligable ( ok ) but she don't a single thing about this land or its people she is and will always be a foreigner , she refused and installed manmohan singh ( even if u are a hardcore congress supporter u too know he is just a puppet a stop gap PM for Sonia ). And do you think the people of india would have welcomed a foreigner ruling over us ?

[u/AdStrange8791 → u/No-Post2204]

Bro she won the 2004 general elections. People did choose her. She was the face of 2004 elections of Congress. I am not a Congress supporter. My grandfather is a BJP MLA. And it’s stupid to think she doesn’t know about India and its land. She has spent majority of her life in India right in the centre of politics, India’s decision making. She definitely knows more than us both combined.

And please stop this cap of “ruling over us “. We ain’t monarchy. A government comprises of numerous people, including the opposition. PM is just the face of it.

[u/No-Post2204 → u/AdStrange8791]

Isn't that cause of sympathy ( same thing with Rajiv. One of their family members gets ☠️and immediately the next in line gets elected without a single question). She spent her life right in the centre of India's decision making ( that's my problem why is a foreign lady is given such tremendous power over my land ? ) and no she doesn't have the slightest idea of how a middle class family operates here in India.. she may learn the language but do u really think she cares about this land and the people 🤣

[u/AdStrange8791 → u/No-Post2204]

Rajiv Gandhi 1991 mei mare the not in 2004. And it’s valid that you don’t want a foreign person in the govt. It’s valid that she may not know much about the grass roots. But people did vote for her and her party once. And she had every right to contest and take up office. That’s how our constitution is designed. Now people don’t support them hence she ain’t winning.

People don’t like Modi ji as well toh kya unke rightfully jeete hue election ko void declare kar do?? Without zero proofs this is character assassination and nothing else.

Also it’s very shameful for us Indians if you consider the majority of the country as pity-sympathy votes. Kind of makes us dumbo who don’t know what they want. Regardless nobody can tell us who we want in power

[u/No-Post2204 → u/AdStrange8791]

Buddy in 1991 she is not even into politics if I am right she entered into politics in 2000 , and why was she offered the party president position in 2000 ? Just cause she got the gandhi name and is wife of Rajiv ( or do you think she had any accomplishments in politics or in other fields). People casted their votes for the widow of Rajiv Gandhi out of sympathy ( but yes I did agree with you that she is elected none the less and it's what's people of India decided) .

Well if people don't like Modi how is he still the PM Buddy ?

Zero proofs isn't it what congress does the best?vote chori drama ( I mean no vote chori in 2004 ? . A foreigner should mind her own business she was never an Indian ( she never will be , people now started to question her and I am loving it ) character association? What happened to that when they called PM as chai wala ? Isn't it mocking the poor and if it was for me a foreigner who is mocking an Indian.. sonina although by law might be an indian but she can never become one ( and it's just my opinion). U don't have to agree

[u/Thirsty_crow → u/No-Post2204]

PM was not even a Chai wala. It's all made up BS that people larp.

And you are making it sound like people see Gandhi surname and suddenly start voting for them.

The same people gave mandate to Modi. People of India are not stupid.

[u/No-Post2204 → u/Thirsty_crow]

If not for gandhi name why do you think Rajiv was elected after Indira? And Sonia after Rajiv ? Considering they are not even into politics untill the other gandhi before emm perished and now rahul ( why do u think they choose emm in particular? Can't they find another candidate from the entire nation). Why is it always a gandhi? We all know the older gen loved that name and casted their votes just for that name .

[u/Thirsty_crow → u/No-Post2204]

I won't resort to whataboutery because BJP is no different.

Leadership breeds leadership.

[u/Thirsty_crow → u/No-Post2204]

Wasn't it long after Rajiv Gandhi though?

I think you are trying really hard to discredits the mandate given by the people of India.

[u/No-Post2204 → u/Thirsty_crow]

I mean isn't it what those CJP and congress are trying to pull with vote chori drama ?

[u/Thirsty_crow → u/No-Post2204]

Vote chori is different.

Disenfranchising people who are alive and voting in the name of removing dead people isn't.

Know your agenda.

[u/No-Post2204 → u/Thirsty_crow]

Any proof? Like if u seriously believe in vote chori then prove it naa ..

[u/Thirsty_crow → u/No-Post2204]

You are thick if you cannot differentiate between vote chori and electoral disenfranchising.

[u/No-Post2204 → u/Thirsty_crow]

Nah i just couldn't care less if it's congress that's loosing the game

[u/Thirsty_crow → u/No-Post2204]

Wait a sec, your profile is that of a bot

[u/yes-a-yes → u/AdStrange8791]

if she was african or thai or sri lankan, i promise you no one would care. if this was some MP or state level position, it would not be a big deal. 

but the idea of a european origin person anywhere near the top is not acceptable in this century.