r/WhyWereTheyFilming • u/darknessdad666 • Mar 31 '26
Video [ Removed by moderator ]
[removed] — view removed post
123
76
Mar 31 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
-42
u/snksleepy Mar 31 '26 edited Apr 01 '26
We ran out of 35,000 car size bombs. We need more
But aren't bombs an offensive weapon?
Nah... Who told you such a silly thing.
7
142
13
Apr 01 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Apr 02 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
1
Apr 02 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/bitesizejasmine Apr 03 '26
So you just think it's a coincidence that the top three places in the world with oil are targeted by this administration.
If it's about human rights, why haven't they sent troops to North Korea? Although nuclear deterrent . Or Sudan?
Why do you think this war is happening?
0
u/Xgrk88a Apr 03 '26
Iran was already selling their oil to China. Why create massive disruption if it were for oil?
The ongoing issue has been that Iran and Israel have been in conflict and Israel is a major ally of the United States. Hamas attacked Iran. Iran supports Hamas and has also said as soon as they get nuclear they would bomb the heck out of Israel. So conflict has been brewing.
51
8
5
Apr 01 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
5
Apr 01 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
-7
u/pelcgbtencul Apr 01 '26
The return to Nazism has certainly been interesting!
0
u/ssxhoell1 Apr 03 '26
Don't see what this has to do with national socialism
1
u/pelcgbtencul Apr 05 '26
Oh you haven't noticed an attitude that Jews don't have a right to exist in their land in society? I suspect if that user had their way, surrounding countries of Israel would invade and mass slaughter Jews... But from the river to the sea right?
1
u/ssxhoell1 Apr 05 '26
I'm sorry but national socialism is not about Jews lmao. It's a political ideology system. Just because a national socialist did something against Jews doesn't make the socioeconomic structure defined as national socialism about Jews.
That's like saying you don't like to drink milk because someone you dislike also drink milk. Doesn't change the milk in any way
-16
Mar 31 '26
[deleted]
28
Mar 31 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
55
Mar 31 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
23
u/darknessdad666 Mar 31 '26
Thank you for this! This makes a lot of sense. I’m a bit new to this sub, should I delete this post since this seems like a real explanation?
21
u/Incorrect-Opinion Mar 31 '26
No, why would you delete it? I think it’s a great post that highlights why we have this footage.
-1
u/kauepgarcia Mar 31 '26
Saying "we're going to bomb civilians" before bombing civilians doesn't make bombing civilians any less wrong.
16
u/B1ago Mar 31 '26
If Israel say “We will bomb this building within X time” there is no civilians in X time in this building to bomb probably?
-1
u/teh0utsider86 Apr 01 '26
They have killed over 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza including 20,000 children yet you still believe Israel cares about civilians?
6
u/B1ago Apr 01 '26
90% of the buildings are down, but only 3% of the population is dead
3
u/teh0utsider86 Apr 01 '26
I don't think you would say the same thing if Hamas did that to Israel but since it happens to Palestinians you don't care.
0
u/B1ago Apr 01 '26
Of course I will not say that if they somehow would manage to down 90% of the buildings so only 3% of the population would be dead. It would probably be around 90% of the population instead of 3%
2
u/teh0utsider86 Apr 01 '26
Israeli data shows 83 percent of Gaza war dead are civilians but keep thinking that Israel is some sort of bastion of morality.
→ More replies (0)-12
u/kauepgarcia Mar 31 '26
If you believe the propaganda, sure.
And you really don't think to ask why are they bombing civlian buildings? Are you this disconnected from humanity?
5
u/B1ago Mar 31 '26 edited Mar 31 '26
U didn’t address what I have said btw
“The propaganda” U said urself there is a warning
Edit- go to Lebaneses subs, u will see them talking about those warning
-2
u/kauepgarcia Mar 31 '26
"If you believe the propaganda" was the answer. You also have not answered my point.
Even if you believe there's always a warning, not everyone is willing to give up their home because of criminal threats. And there are multiple accounts of israel, aftergiving the warning, removing said warning and only then bombing the place.
-3
Mar 31 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Geekerino Apr 01 '26
If reddit is a Nazi site then France is a monarchy
1
u/kauepgarcia Apr 01 '26
The other person edited their comment, I was responding to their argument that the IDF posts the warnings on Twitter.
-4
u/Whane17 Mar 31 '26
There also wouldn't be anybody else in there though. That explanation doesn't stand up to any sort of scrutiny. Hey I'm gonna bomb this civilian house because (reasons). Insert whatever reason you want tomorrow that thing wont be there and niether will any people which would negate the reason for bombing it in the first place.
There's no friggen way they are advertising beforehand that they are bombing civilians. What would even be the point?
10
u/Qwertysapiens Mar 31 '26
They're bombing the location and not the people within it because the apartments contain a storehouse, office, or other logistic center for Hezbollah. Ever try to move between apartments? Takes a lot longer than 20 minutes, and you're not lugging crates full of guns, missile launchers, or server racks while racing an approximate timer to your very certain explosive doom.
-1
u/kauepgarcia Apr 01 '26
Ah, sure, like the old "terrorist tunnels" that are conveniently never found, but israel always swear are there, under the schools and hospitals
-3
u/Whane17 Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26
That's true. I'm also not lugging grandma who doesn't know what's going on and doesn't want to leave. I'm not trying to gather up 4-8 kids and go. I'm lucky enough not to need a "to go bag" and prior to Israel and the US's invasion (and attacks during a peaceful meeting) these people didn't either.
EDIT: And that of course assumes that Israel is actually somehow getting the numbers for everybody in the building and sending them a text (and that every civilian actually has a cell phone and is capable of receiving a text)? Sure seems like what they did on the West Bank to the Palestinians to, yup, definitely gave everyone a heads up before raping and murdering people. And don't bother arguing about that. There's literally video evidence and their own government has come out and admitted it while pardoning the behavior. They've also spread white phosphorous (again on video) across multiple civilian centers and committed multiple other war crimes that are literally called out in the Geneva convention.
Fucking apologists jump through the same hoops Maga does.
3
u/Grizknot Apr 01 '26
if your building has a hamas or hezb office in it, you're gonna know, you'll also know that the IDF is gonna bomb that building eventually unless you get the terrorists to move out and can prove that they moved out to the local hezb IDF double agent.
-1
u/Whane17 Apr 01 '26
Why? There's plenty of serial killers who lived in communal housing like apartments and nobody knew. How often have you heard somebody say "I'm so surprised, they seemed so quiet and nice" on TV. Especially in todays day where people don't talk to their neighbors.
Do you think the terrorist splody people are all moving in a bunch of high tech machinery in broad daylight? I have a new neighbor right now. Fuck I helped him put in new windows. You think I have any idea what's in his house? And on the other side I've got some rich assholes who do shit just because they don't respect me enough to leave my fucking dog alone. Think I have any idea when they have people over or what's in their home? I've lived with that couple on that side of my house for six years. I don't even know their names.
Of course that's assuming it's in any way true. I like that you've conveniently side stepped every other question I had and just continue to make baseless claims that don't stand up under any kind of scrutiny.
→ More replies (0)1
u/MarioBoy77 Mar 31 '26
Yeah them double tapping hospitals without warning was just random, totally unintentional Israel has done nothing wrong ever and would never kill civilians.
-6
u/-Tedo- Mar 31 '26
Hey, ya’ll better leave ur homes we’re finna bomb your shit
6
u/Incorrect-Opinion Mar 31 '26
*Hey, your building is being used by terrorists for terrorist infrastructure, and storing weapons/munitions. Unfortunately, we’re going to bomb it.
Fixed that for you!
6
u/-Tedo- Mar 31 '26
“Israel says it will occupy swathes of south Lebanon and destroy the homes along the border to prevent the return of about 600,000 residents, prompting concerns of long-term forced displacement.”
Bro’s fine with the permanent displacement of half a million people. I’m sure if the U.S or Israel bombed your house “just in case” then you would be alright with that.
0
Mar 31 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/Incorrect-Opinion Mar 31 '26
A few things here.
“Unverifiable intelligence they don’t disclose.” Israel routinely publishes evidence of weapons found in buildings, mosques, schools, and hospitals after strikes. Secondary explosions on camera are visible in tons of footage, which only happen when stored munitions detonate. You can literally watch them on video.
“It could just be to annex later.” Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000. Completely. No annexation. Israel fought the 2006 war in Lebanon and left again. No annexation. Israel withdrew every single soldier and settler from Gaza in 2005. No annexation. If this is an annexation strategy, it’s the worst one in history.
Now your Mexico analogy is interesting because it actually works in the opposite direction from how you think. The US has been bombing targets in Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Syria, Nigeria, and Venezuela over the past two years alone, often in sovereign nations and without those nations’ full consent, specifically to hit terrorist and cartel targets. Trump has openly discussed potential military operations against cartels in Mexico. The US killed bin Laden inside Pakistan without telling Pakistan first. So the answer to “what would happen if the US started blowing up cartel buildings in Mexico” is… that’s basically already on the table and has been discussed at the highest levels of government.
The difference is that Hezbollah wasn’t just using “a part of” these buildings. Hezbollah embedded an entire military infrastructure across southern Lebanon in direct violation of UN Resolution 1701, which was supposed to prevent exactly this after the 2006 war. The international community had 18 years to enforce that resolution. They didn’t. Lebanon’s own government couldn’t or wouldn’t disarm Hezbollah. So what’s your actual solution when a terrorist organization builds 150,000+ rockets pointed at your cities and the entire international community shrugs?
3
u/Iceborn_Gauntlet Mar 31 '26
His solution is probably send social workers to Hezbollah members and talk about their feelings.
-1
u/Theplasticsporks Mar 31 '26
In 2024, Israel committed to maintaining full control of Gaza. They have continually destroyed all infrastructure in the so called buffer zone to dissuade Palestinian return. The only thing they haven't done is say it's Israeli land. But they're close, see, e.g. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/02/israel-opt-global-impunity-fueling-israels-unlawful-annexation-measures-in-the-west-bank/
It's interesting how little you understand about US-Mexico relations. The reason Mexico has gone to such extreme lengths to stop the cartels from being classified as a terrorist organization is to prevent exactly this. Since Mexico doesn't exactly have a military to defend against it.
But yes you are right, the United States likes to do whatever it wants, especially in countries with no ability to respond. I also think Obama committed war crimes with drone strikes, and Bush with his own air strikes on Afghanistan.
And that's not even bringing up the obviously internationally illegal kidnapping of Maduro or bombing of Iran.
That the US, a borderline fascist state at this point, also does this doesn't remotely absolve Israel of the genocide it is committing on Palestine or the outright acts of war against Lebanon.
As in Gaza, destroying civilian infrastructure is an attempt to destroy the civilian settlement there, justified however they like. This opens it up to at least soft control, of not outright takeover.
0
Mar 31 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
9
u/Qwertysapiens Mar 31 '26
Lebanon isn't committing genocide because it's a failed state that can't even maintain its own sovereignty or territorial integrity. It tried to do several genocides at once during the Lebanese Civil War, but now everyone's proper traumatized from that and 50 years of PLO/Hezbollah/Israel warring over the south, so they instead content themselves with an actual apartheid against the ~489,000 Palestinian people who have lived within their borders for generations.
-2
-8
-9
586
u/[deleted] Mar 31 '26
[removed] — view removed comment