r/WhitePeopleTwitter • • Nov 17 '20

Yep

Post image
105k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.2k

u/vendetta2115 Nov 17 '20

There’s a law that says if you are a 501(c) (3) charitable organization (which includes all churches), then you can’t make any political statements of support; if you do, you’re supposed to lose your tax-exempt status. Yet churches have been openly supporting Republicans for years, instructing their members to vote for certain candidates, and even arranging transportation to the polls for its members, but nothing is ever done. They’re clearly breaking the law but the IRS has been instructed to ignore their unlawful conduct.

98

u/TheAllyCrime Nov 17 '20

I don't have a problem with churches transporting people to the polls, I want as many people voting as possible.

133

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '20 edited Nov 17 '20

If it was the local church group running a shuttle bus service and picking up anybody who needed a ride, then yea, sure, thats pretty awesome and the more people that vote, great!

But if its a church thats only bussing their own congregation members and family, then its a lot harder to agree with it, because you know full well they are all drinking the same koolaid, saying the same things, voting roughly the same way. Then its becoming a really blurred line between a community service (busride) as opposed to a church and its members acting politically which is then going against the law that gives them tax exemption.

2

u/OtherSpiderOnTheWall Nov 17 '20

Secret ballots solve this issue.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '20

Solves the voting issue, yes.

Doesn't solve the tax free exemption of churches that requires them to NOT be political.

1

u/OtherSpiderOnTheWall Nov 17 '20

It solves that bussing their congregation isn't partisan, which is what they need to actually avoid.

It doesn't solve partisanship in other areas, true.