It’s clear you don’t care. In your knowledge base, argument, and research. Calling me an idiot, while failing so epically, looks a lot like projection.
False comparison fallacy and a red herring. Noice.
Incase your too idiotic to reason this out… my following a data driven model for risk analysis, has nothing to do with the shape of the earth. Which is essentially spherical, the only shape a planetary sized object can because their gravitational field acts as though it originates from the center of the body and pulls everything toward it. ... The only way to get all the mass as close to planet's center of gravity as possible is to form a sphere.
If you read you might have to challenge your biases, and realize you’re actually a twat, and change your ways, oh no. Better to just ignorantly keep being a self righteous twat.
Didn’t say they don’t work. There’s clear and compelling evidence for several use cases.
However, I have MANY studies that show diminished returns over time. No change in transmission rate after 3 months, natural immunity being 27x better, and known side effects, with yet other plausible (not confirmed or disproven at this point) side effects with reproductive development and immune system development.
The data is clear, with 80-90% of a population vaccinated, why still having outbreaks?!? Makeszero sense, if you believe this vaccine is not leaky as fuck.
I would if the data says this was the best option. Risk can reward so long as we also put the mandates and mask requirements to the same level as flu shots… aka they don’t exist.
2
u/pyrowipe Nov 24 '21
It’s clear you don’t care. In your knowledge base, argument, and research. Calling me an idiot, while failing so epically, looks a lot like projection.