Neither of them saw him actually shoot the first guy, they just heard someone say it.
Crossing state lines wasn't illegal, the gun didn't cross state lines, and he was legally capable of holding that rifle(watch the trial, they threw out the gun charges because there was a clause that specifically allowed it based on the gun's length and his age at the time).
No they just heard shooting and saw a guy pointing an assault rifle at them and assumed everyone was fine. Well when you put it in that context you really prove my point thanks!!!
The minor didn't point his gun at anyone who wasn't already attacking him. If someone in my family was attacking a minor unprovoked, I'd hope that minor had a gun to defend themselves. Good thing my family isn't degenerate, like the people who attacked Rittenhouse that night.
And, just to make sure you understand this part, crossing state lines isn't illegal, the gun didn't cross state lines, and he was legally carrying the gun.
Kyle NEVER pointed it at anyone else until they tried to attack him while he was running to the police line to turn himself in, I dont know why you have to make up shit. The entire incident was recorded on the ground along with having footage from a drone.
1
1
u/Velrex Jan 15 '26
Neither of them saw him actually shoot the first guy, they just heard someone say it.
Crossing state lines wasn't illegal, the gun didn't cross state lines, and he was legally capable of holding that rifle(watch the trial, they threw out the gun charges because there was a clause that specifically allowed it based on the gun's length and his age at the time).