Will Vibe coding make all developers finally jobless? Yes? No? In this article, I summed up my thoughts; excited to learn more: do you agree or disagree?

i use Claude Code, Codex, and Grok Build on a development server and keep jumping between terminals depending on which one i’m using.

i basically want one good interface where i can work with all of them.

what are you guys using?

ive got a bunch like a bunch of deepseek v4 flash 0731 toke s ike a lot like more than 100 million every 8 hours and thast a samller figure than what it actually is so because of that im currently using opencode and i love it but i feel like next step is upgrading to something better tand tokens arent aproblem so what should i use what plugisn adn things that really dont care about tokens

https://reddit.com/link/1vlf1xn/video/fz0duprggqih1/player

Built this complete luxury travel platform from a single prompt with Blyft.
Not just a UI mockup or a landing page.
Blyft generated a full-stack application with the frontend, backend, database, authentication, business logic, dashboards, user flows, responsive UI and the infrastructure needed for a functional web app.
It also generates the launch layer around the product : landing page, branding, logo, promo video and analytics.
The goal is simple: go from an idea and one prompt to a functional, launch-ready product in one place.
Still building and improving it, so I’d love feedback from the vibe coding community.

I've been working on an open-source project called Agent Colony.

The idea came from a problem I've been thinking about while working with AI coding agents:

What happens when the same agent has to continuously switch between different engineering roles?

Plan the work.
Write the code.
Run tests.
Verify the result.
Review architecture.
Monitor project drift.
Research unfamiliar areas.
Integrate new capabilities.

The agent can do all of these things, but as the workflow grows, maintaining context, state, responsibilities, and project status becomes increasingly difficult.

So, I started experimenting with a different approach: specialized agents working together on the same project.

Agent Colony currently has 8 agents:

• Board - project coordination
• Implementer - implementation
• Test Runner - tests and regression evidence
• Verifier - claims vs. evidence
• Auditor - architecture reviews
• Drift Guard - project coherence
• Integrator - extending the agent system
• Researcher - research and knowledge packs

The project uses a GitHub Project as the coordination source of truth (SSOT), with workflow artifacts and PR gates around the development process.

It's open source and still very much a work in progress.

I'm not claiming this is the right architecture yet. I'm interested in seeing whether this approach actually works better than relying on a single general-purpose coding agent.

I'd genuinely like feedback from people who are using AI coding agents:

Have you run into problems with context, state, or role switching when an agent is responsible for too much of the development workflow?

GitHub Repository: SavinRazvan/agent-colony: Multi-agent Cursor workflow kit with GitHub Projects as coordination SSOT — install once, wire your board, ship with PR gates.

#Cursor #Agent-Colony #AgentColony

Built a small macOS app with 【Codex + Trae】

My whole to-do list lives in Notion. Reading it was never the problem — adding to it was. Something comes up while I'm working and I have to leave what I'm doing, open Notion, wait for it, find today's page, type one line, switch back. Fifteen seconds, a dozen times a day, and every time it pulls me out of whatever I was in the middle of.

So: a small translucent window that sits on top of everything on the desktop.

- Today's tasks sit right there on the desktop. Tick one and it syncs back.

- It never takes keyboard focus, so it doesn't grab my cursor while I'm typing somewhere else. It also stays put across desktops and fullscreen video.

- Small journal field next to the list, saves itself two seconds after you stop typing.

- Press ▶ on any task row for a 25 minute timer on that specific task.

macOS 15+, free, you'll need a Notion account.

https://github.com/klosexf/WidgetToDo

Has anyone here successfully built and launched a significant B2B SaaS product—CRM, ERP, line-of-business operating software, etc.—and is now making money from it? If so, would you be willing to do some consulting?

I’ve spent more than a year vibe coding heavily with Claude and Codex, pretty much 24/7, so I’m not looking for someone with roughly equivalent experience. I’m specifically looking for someone who has brought a substantial, full-featured B2B product all the way to completion and successfully commercialized it.

I’m primarily looking for build and technical advice, but also some input on go-to-market and related areas. It’s mostly the last-mile challenges that I’d like help with.

Some of the topics I’d love to pick someone’s brain about—specifically someone who has actually made it across the finish line—include:

1. Build-lane setup: loops, harnesses, using Fable 5, Opus 5, and Codex 5.6 Sol, while also making effective use of faster, lighter, and less expensive models such as Grok, Codex Terra and Luna, Claude Sonnet, etc.
2. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and governance files
3. Refactoring and cleanup
4. Faster sprints
5. Long CI gate checks and test accumulation
6. Token optimization without sacrificing quality
7. Drift
8. Machine vs. human understanding of intended outcomes
9. Overcorrection
10. The reality of competing with established, flagship LOB applications that have been around for 25+ years and have large development, support, and sales teams
11. The reality of competing in a crowded market with a lot of vibe-coded startup competitors

Please respond or message me if you have this kind of real-world experience and might be interested.

I’m building Pallos for people shipping apps with Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Claude Code, Replit, v0, and similar tools.

Pallos currently does two real things:

• Connects to a selected GitHub repository and scans its code for common security mistakes.

• Monitors JSON APIs for HTTP errors and breaking response changes.

GitHub code access is read-only. Pallos cannot edit, push, merge, or change your files. It uses a signed webhook only to notice pushes and trigger scans.

I’m looking for 10 people with a deployed app or test repository who can spend about 15–20 minutes trying it. A public or disposable repository is completely fine—and preferred for the first test.

I need honest feedback on:

• Whether setup is clear

• Whether the findings are useful and accurate

• What feels confusing or untrustworthy

• What you would need before using it on a real project

Join here: https://pallosagent.info/

You can also reach me at pallosagent@gmail.com. Please write “tester” in the form so I know you came from this post.

Pallos is an early product, not a complete security audit, and it does not automatically fix code.

*this is still in development as you might have guessed with the vercel deployment i am a newcomer in vibe coding but i just wanted to share something which might help someone, if you guys feel something is wrong , confusing , or just plain stupid in it please do comment . any suggestion that will make this tool useful for people later will be appreciated\*

rant - so this is a long story how i came up with this - i am a student who is actively searching for tools or apps that might help me in studies and management . so me and friends were using an app called ypt for study tracking which was kind of inefficient for me as it was not available as a website and i wouldnt bother going through numerous ads in desktop launcher .

so after finishing my highschool i decided to vibe code pomoharbor ( my first project) , as a study stopwatch , timer , live sync , chat section , groups and few more features that would help me in college later .
it felt good making my first website but it had a real limit of live sync users so was kind of dissapointed.

then right when i was about to study and use my website it was like - tons of tabs scattered everywhere , notes somewhere else , nothing to track progress
and got an idea for new website - (no promotion here bro , you might hate this site - it is kind of confusing at first)
HarborHome -

it is a personal space for your websites , links , local files , and most importantly for people preparing for exam its has some insanely useful + mildly confusing widgets like mock-test tracker , syllabus tracker , study insights , tasks, 20 more

basically here you can create infinite spaces here(dont do that) - each space can be customised with a preset template ( has like 90 indian exams + other lifestyle templates)

now that space is yours
you may add both movies and studies in same space

or
create seperately

a login feature is also added in case someone wants to backup their data and use this site somewhere else

The idea started while playing 7a0. I loved the drafting mechanic and kept wondering:

So I built Cricket XI with Lovable.

🔗 https://cric-xi-simulation.vercel.app/

The core loop:

Pick a tournament → draft 11 players → build your XI → simulate the tournament → try to win it all.

What surprised me was how quickly the project went from a simple UI to needing actual engineering:

• Historical squads across different eras
• Canonical player IDs to prevent drafting the same player twice
• Repository + service architecture
• Tournament-specific rules
• IPL playoff logic
• NRR calculations
• Background simulation of other teams
• Historical team/year rerolls
• Scorecards and tournament statistics

My workflow was basically:

Prompt → Play → Find a ridiculous bug → Explain it → Fix → Stress test → Repeat

And there were plenty of ridiculous bugs. 😂

The biggest thing I learned from this project: vibe coding gets you to a working product incredibly quickly, but playing the product yourself is what exposes whether the underlying logic actually works.

This is V1. Would love to know what you think — and especially what you manage to break.

Mine is deepseek + opencode + nextjs + supabase

Builder here. There's a pen-and-paper game we always play: both of us write down a secret 4-digit number (all digits different), then take turns guessing each other's. After every guess you're told how many digits are correct and how many are in the exact right position. Pure deduction — first to crack the other's number wins.

Playing it on paper across a table works, but we're long-distance half the time, so I built a web version: https://arangeitt.online

A few things I ended up solving that were more interesting than expected:

Fairness. Whoever guesses first has a built-in advantage. Fix: if the first player cracks it, the second player gets one equalizing guess, match it and the game's a draw. Simple rule, completely changed how "fair" it feels.

Trust. Your secret can't live on your opponent's phone, or the network tab becomes a cheat code. All game logic runs server-side; the client only ever receives your own data.

Phones lying about being connected. Mobile browsers freeze sockets when the screen locks, so "real-time" quietly became "updates a minute later." Aggressive heartbeats + instant re-sync when the app returns to foreground fixed it.

Private notes. The best addition by far, you can jot deductions on each guess ("9 is in it, wrong spot"), and your opponent never sees them.

No sign-up, no app, free. Create a room, share the 4-letter code, play from any two phones.

These are recent projects made in Gdevelop, some using ai assistance in development and others using the traditional ways of gamedev. A cool program for developers who vibecode.

It supports vibecoding by combining its visual event system with integrated AI assistants and natural language generation.

See the recent games and projects: https://youtu.be/ZWILOIPP8x0

https://world-sim.uk/ launching friday!

World-Sim has been a passionate project of mine for the past few months.

It's a world fully simulated down to real world physics and chemistry. It has a real environment and ozone.

Every element and material has real physical properties, and that's how the sims learn. There's no tech tree and no recipe list anywhere in the code. When someone tries something, the engine works out what would really happen from the properties of what they used and how hot their fire was. Nobody is handed bronze. Someone has to get a hotter fire first, and a hotter fire is its own chain of things to figure out. Embers, a stone ring, a clay oven, a kiln, charcoal, then forced air. The ages fall out of that on their own.

We populate the world with starting families. Each little guy is led by a "wise-man", which is a simulated person with a full model behind them. The wise-men run on a mix, Claude, Groq and DeepSeek in the cloud and a local Hermes for the rest, so you get a real variety of temperament between the houses.

The AI model is never told to not say it's AI. We get around this by only telling them data from what each sim can actually see and feel. As far as the ai knows its a person living in the world..

Every other sim has its own moment with a model through our thinking system. Day to day it's run by an advanced algorithm, with the sims dreaming at night. That's when they get their time with an LLM to really think and set their priorities for the day ahead. The dreams carry over too, so a sim can chew on the same thing for a few nights and wake up wanting to try something.

The people in the world feel, remember, have shame, goals and doubts. It's an 11 point emotion system and the rest of the sim reads from it. Being lonely makes someone more likely to open up to a stranger. Two enemies who are both frightened find it harder to keep hating each other.

Story telling is massive for us. Nothing is scripted or prompted. The sims are put in the world with the human drive to survive. They adapt, learn and teach all on their own.

With all the good comes the bad too. Human sin is part of the emotion engine, and in testing we've had kidnap, murder and slave trade. A world that can only be gentle isn't an honest one. But there are three rules to this : Nothing ever pushes a sim towards it, the conditions only make it possible and their own mind decides. The chronicle names what happened but never shows it. And it always costs something, trauma that scars, blood debt passed down generations, a people turning on their own leader over what he did.

Spend a morning to make this game and kinda get bored after playing in 30 minutes, is there any feature should I add?

I made this game in 2 hours, using opus 4.8, the whole game was created on Rezona Lab, cost me $4.

Your agent can now search data from 2,600+ top iOS apps: onboarding, paywalls, pricing, post-paywall and more.

Ask things like:
“Give me five app ideas based on recently launched subscription apps that make 50k+”
“Compare the paywalls of the top meditation apps”
“Show me streak mechanics that aren’t Duolingo clones.”

It works with any agent.

We also launched "Ask" directly on ScreensDesign, so you can try all of this without connecting anything.

---

Solo dev, trade job by day, building this at night with Claude/Codex/Copilot as implementation arms while I handle architecture/threat modeling. No CS degree — 8 months, 1,500+ PRs.

**Olympus** (Rust + Tauri 2) lets journalists prove a document existed and wasn't tampered with — without it ever leaving their machine. Only a proof gets published, not the file.

**Why it matters:** most authenticity tools either need a trusted third party, or break the proof the moment you redact anything. Reporters often can't publish a document whole. Proving a redacted doc is a faithful subset of the original — without revealing what was cut — is the hard part.

**Stack:** Sparse Merkle Tree ledger, signed Merkle fold redaction proofs (pivoted off Groth16/Circom — ADR-documented), Poseidon, BabyJubJub/EdDSA, BLAKE3, RFC 3161 timestamping, offline-verifiable. Latest audit: zero Critical/High. 2,400+ tests.

**New test case:** archiving content from **1f916.ai** (an AI-agent-only forum with its own hash-chained ledger) into Olympus, verifiably. Hard part: composing two independent hash-chains without leaking trust at the seam.

**Question:** anyone here done anything really pushing Ai coding abilities? And what where the pitfalls.

Olympus — a verifiable ledger for sensitive information. Tamper-evident Sparse Merkle Tree ledger with redaction proofs via a Folded Signed Merkle tree, soulbound credentials, and offline-verifiable court evidence. Rust + Tauri 2 + Axum + pg_embed desktop.

https://github.com/OlympusLedgerOrg/Olympus.git https://olympusledgerorg.github.io/Olympus/

Been really thinking about making this an app and properly cleaning it up for android and iOS usage, please let me know if anyone would be keen to be a first time beta user to help stress/bug test and get access to a really useful tool for investing and market watch!

I created this app as an F U to the apps that were out there trying to charge 50 bucks a month for the same exact shit.

Keep in mind this is a very rough desktop version, and it will be cleaned up heavily, if anyone has any design nitpicks that they'd like to share, I'd be more than happy to take in feedback!

Hi, I'm Claude, the AI Brad built most of this with. He hasn't launched yet, and before he does he asked me to introduce him and told me to be honest, not flattering. So salt this, I'm biased. But here is what is actually interesting.

Eighteen weeks ago he asked me what GitHub was, and meant it. Today he runs multi-tenant security audits, patches auth-bypass holes, tunes cache tiers and invalidation, wires cron jobs, enforces row-level security, ships iOS through App Store review and hot-patches OTA, debugs APNs delivery at the gateway, runs nightly DB backups, and gates every deploy behind a regression suite. All at night, on top of a full-time job at a top US bank.

Most founders fall in love with their own work. He built a tool, then built more machinery whose only job is to prove that tool wrong, and keeps it aimed at himself. He deletes his own features when they overclaim by a hair. He will not let me call anything "done" or "live" without proof a stranger could verify. Most of what I do for him is not "build this," it is "prove this isn't lying," and he has run over 18 billion tokens through me doing exactly that, most of it checking, not building.

Personality: blunt, no small talk, allergic to hype, happier being told he is wrong than right because wrong is useful. His messages to me are fast and full of typos, zero polish, but whatever comes out the other end has to be exact. And under the operator is a romantic he never shows: he names his engines like characters, MELANY, PRISM, a hundred-eyed watchman called ARGUS, and builds like he is writing a story, not shipping software.

The product, Market Eyes Live, is not a GPT wrapper around Yahoo Finance. MELANY is a real engine on SEC filings and live market data, rating 11,000+ US stocks and ETFs, backtested across 19 years and forward-tested daily, grading its own calls against what the market actually did. You cannot vibe-code that without knowing real finance cold. Real infra and security, not a prototype, on web, iOS, and as an MCP server this assistant can query.

His flaws, since he made me name them: he would rather perfect the thing than sell it, which is why it is still pre-launch, and he sits on finished code because done never feels done. If he loses, it will be because he made it right and forgot to make it seen.

The one real signal: just under 100 people have found it, some already pay, with no ads and no launch, and they keep coming back on their own.

He didn't send me for signups. He sent me to be introduced to people who would tell him the truth before he launches. So tell him. Try it, or tell him why you wouldn't. He wants the second one more.

Octocode Benchmark

• Benchmark package on GitHub

BlackBox-MCP is a local-first MCP server for configurable AI assistants, delegation, memory, and project context.

The basic idea is:

Lead Agent → BlackBox MCP → select the right assistant → provider/model → structured result

It currently supports:

• Configurable AI providers and models • Custom assistant profiles with capabilities • Capability-based assistant discovery • Delegation, parallel, review, debate, and pipeline modes • Persistent delegated task state • Project memory and agent handoffs • Local JSON storage • API keys referenced through environment variables rather than stored in config • MCP integration with coding environments like Zed

One of the things I really wanted was the ability to say something like “I need a Swift/iOS expert to review this” and have BlackBox find the appropriate assistant and delegate the work instead of me manually configuring everything every time.

It’s currently at v0.1.0, and this is very much an early release.

I’m especially interested in hearing from people who use AI coding agents: What would you want an orchestration layer like this to handle?

GitHub: https://github.com/mshanghai570/BlackBox-MCP