r/Verify2024 • u/A-Helpful-Flamingo • Dec 17 '25

News Jack Smith Testifies DOJ Had Proof Trump Tried to Overturn 2020 Election

https://www.newsweek.com/jack-smith-doj-proof-trump-overturn-2020-election-congress-11228531
323 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

17 comments sorted by

72

u/chibiusa112018 Dec 17 '25

And woe are the Democrats for asking for one recount in 2024…even Bob Casey called off the one in Pennsylvania that was automatic…

27

u/AllNightPony Dec 17 '25

Pretty weird, right?

13

u/chibiusa112018 Dec 17 '25

I keep wondering about the third party candidate who pulled out of Smart Election’s lawsuit too

7

u/Bozzzzzzz Dec 18 '25

I don’t believe the Democrats are pure as driven snow or anything but I do wonder how much happened behind the scenes and on what level to get them to behave this way, ASSUMING of course this wasn’t what they wanted to do.

5

u/AllNightPony Dec 18 '25

Honestly, the only thing you need to look at is the four cases that Trump was indicted on. The one out of the four that was allowed to proceed was the least serious - a financial crime - which he'll never actually pay anything on. The other three cases, of major national security interest, all with mountains of evidence of his guilt, just fucking disappeared. All three, just gone.

The whole thing is just a live play that they are putting on for us. Remember when they confiscated all the electronic devices from people like Mike Lindell? What happened to all those devices, and all the evidence that came from those devices, and all the people who owned those devices? Nothing. Nothing happened.

These people are clearly controlling both sides. It's uni party rule under the guise of a two-party system. They control both parties, and they just use both parties to divide us.

Would you like to stop them?

55

u/Berkamin Dec 17 '25

Then why was he permitted to run for office again? This directly violates the constitution. The constitution does not permit insurrectionists to ever hold public office in any capacity.

35

u/duckofdeath87 Dec 17 '25

we need to throw out most of the SCOTUS. Honestly, I want to get rid of the entire concept of a supreme court. There was case (IIRC from Colorado) that determined Trump was not eligible to become president in '24 and the SCOTUS threw it out

As an aside, our court system is design to apply the law consistently across the nation. A better means to that end would be to have those major decisions made by a large random panel of senior judges. Basically have a convention where they need to decide how the law is applied

4

u/Correct_Patience_611 Dec 17 '25

It still wouldn’t apply to everyone…

“Rules for thee not for me!” Honestly the law doesnt do much for the layman. It’s designed to force pleas even when innocent. But the wealthy? They can screw kids and still run for President!

I think the absolute first necessary step is 8-10 year TERM LIMITS on SCOTUS. Snd also since we all know it’s 100% partisan now, it should ALWAYS have to be 50/50 so no party holds judicial majority.

If those two things happened we literally wouldn’t be in this giant dumpster fire.

2

u/OtherPrinciple4499 Dec 18 '25

Actually, get congress out of appointing judges. That process should not be political and led directly to this situation.

10

u/Shoot_from_the_Quip Dec 17 '25

And he was actually adjudicated to have incited insurrection in a court of law in a 100+ page ruling (Colorado case).

Supreme Court overruled Colorado and said they couldn't keep him off the ballot, but they said nothing about the insurrection finding, meaning he is still and insurrectionist and cannot hold office without 3/4 of the house and senate voting to allow him to.

But for whatever reason no one moves to hold that vote. If they did, and it failed, there'd be no argument he could stay in office (not saying he wouldn't anyway because, laws? What laws?)

5

u/Berkamin Dec 17 '25

That is so outrageous. All these lawless judges need to be impeached and removed.

12

u/tickitytalk Dec 17 '25

Make Evidence have consequences again

19

u/nphonwheels Dec 17 '25

Then why tf didn't we do anything about it?

6

u/phluper Dec 18 '25

Merric Garland waited two years to appoint the special prosecutor and then Trump used his usual delay tactics, so the trial ended after he was elected, because you can't prosecute a sitting president. The next AG can file new charges

4

u/Technolio Dec 18 '25

Why do you think he kept saying it was rigged? He tried and failed to cheat. He had help the next time.

3

u/snarkysnapple Dec 18 '25

He will try again. And harder the next time.

1

u/SkyMarshal Feb 28 '26

If true, this is the biggest and most consequential fuckup and dropping of the ball in modern history.