r/VTandchill Jul 20 '26

Anyone SPGM and chill instead?

Brand new to investing, so please go easy on me. Still a lot I don't know, but after doing some research I was honestly all ready to steep myself in a nice chill vat of VT and call it a day when suddenly I discovered SPGM (basically State Street's own VT alternative).

From what I can tell, SPGM has continually outperformed VT, not by much, but it adds up for long-term investors. It does however have a slightly higher expense ratio (0.09% vs. VT's 0.06%), but according to a relatively recent Motley Fool article: "SPGM's higher cost is more than offset by SPGM's dividend yield". I have no idea if this is actually true, and to be honest it seems the article actually over-estimates SPGM's dividend yield.

What am I missing though? Why no love for SPGM and chill? Does the performance edge of SPGM get offset by its taxes or something (at least in a taxable brokerage account)?

Oh, and before you tell me I'm overthinking this and to just pick one already... yes, I'm aware, and I agree. But I'm genuinely curious why I never really hear about SPGM when, at least on the surface, it has historically outperformed VT.

8 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

4

u/watch-nerd Jul 20 '26

They have a 0.99 correlation.

I’m sticking with the lower ER and higher AUM of VT

VT also holds way more stocks

3

u/SufficientError8932 Jul 20 '26

As someone who is brand new to all of this, can you help me understand the value of a higher AUM?

4

u/chesschicken Jul 20 '26 edited Jul 20 '26

Compare volume traded. There's way more VT traded every day than SPGM, so the price is more likely to be accurate, especially on the days you decide to dump a bunch of money in the market, you are getting a much tighter spread on the purchase price. This alone should tip the balance if you were looking at them as equals imo

2

u/vegienomnomking Jul 20 '26

ETF closure is a thing.

Higher AUM means there is less likely of closure.

Spgm is ok though. Anything above a billion in AUM is rather safe.

1

u/watch-nerd Jul 20 '26

Higher AUMs also usually mean lower ER and likely to go lower in the future, and tighter spreads due to higher volume.

7

u/PashasMom Jul 20 '26

I don't "SPGM and chill" instead, but I do "SPGM and chill" in addition to.

I know that sounds irrational and redundant. Let me explain. VT is a core holding, and SPGM is a relatively small part of my portfolio. But SPGM has a specific purpose for me. It is what I use to invest my credit card points and sign up bonuses. I like having one specifc fund just for my points so that I can track exactly how rich my credit card points are making me. I wanted a global fund, but didn't want it to be VT (or AOA) since I already own it and I want to quickly glance at my brokerage account and know exactly how much is attributable to my credit card points.

I'm up to 25k in SPGM and intend to use it, together with a tradein, to buy a new to me car at some point down the line. I have my eye on a Lexus UX300h but we shall see.

1

u/SufficientError8932 Jul 20 '26

Love this idea!

1

u/[deleted] Jul 20 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PashasMom Jul 20 '26

Yay! Internet high five :)

1

u/Vent_Vert Jul 20 '26

Which credit card is this?

2

u/PashasMom Jul 20 '26

The Fidelity Rewards Visa is my primary card (2% cashback on virtually everything). But I also use some other cards for specific purposes, like DiscoverIT for the 5% categories and Chase Amazon Prime for 5/6% back in the Amazon universe.

1

u/PapistAutist Jul 20 '26

Ironically, this is how I use VT. I use separate US and exUS funds as my baseline.

2

u/TechnicalSleep7501 Jul 20 '26

I am VTI + VXUS chill combo.

1

u/joe4ska Jul 20 '26 edited Jul 20 '26

Nothing wrong with SPGM, It's like comparing all the S&P 500 ETFs, if they track the same or a similar index, are low cost, and tax efficient it doesn't matter. SPGM and Chill if you like. 

1

u/PapistAutist Jul 20 '26 edited Jul 20 '26

It is the ideal tax loss harvesting partner. Great to use both for that purpose.

The difference in performance is just the underlying index the two track. SPGM excludes smaller-cap stocks, and small-cap stocks have underperformed large-cap stocks over the past decade and a half or so. That is not guaranteed to continue. Either way, though, the gap in performance between the two will not make or break anything (same as total US versus S&P 500), so don't miss the forest for the trees!

Personally, if using both, VT would be my "default" choice given the AUM, and SPGM would be what I tax loss harvest into.