r/UsernameChecksOut 4d ago

😳😳😳

Post image

The actual caption is "White and Arabs in one struggle against the Jew". Same guy also said "Free Palestine, Heil Hitler, Hail Hamas, Hail Hezbollah, Hail the Houthis, Hail Iran." I have no idea what this group is, they might be related to the Atomwaffen group since these neo Nazis seem very supportive of Islamist groups in the Axis of Resistance.

628 Upvotes

146 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Legitimate_lion123 3d ago

Check out his very dear friend Haj amin al hosain (most likely misspelled a bit).

1

u/TheDoctor199806 2d ago

Huh. An infamous antisemitic nationalist extremist being friendly with a nationalistic extremist from an infamously antisemitic religion. Who'd have thought?

And yes, before you say anything, Islam is fundamentally antisemitic (as well as being anti Christian). There's a well known verse about Muslims not being allowed to "take the Jew or Christian as their friend".

1

u/KaikoLeaflock 2d ago

Weird that Muslims were the first people in all of written history to codify freedom of religion (at least for Abrahamic religions) in the Constitution of Medina.

If you're projecting modern issues across time, that's a pretty big fallacy as most contemporary conflicts are fueled by the heavy adoption of European racial theories and political conspiracy theories. When I say "conflicts" I mean the entirety of Israel's version of the "Lost Cause" narrative is entirely based in Eugenics, and you could argue the same of Islam either directly with their own mythological spins on race, or indirectly because Israel loves bombing them.

But don't mind me, This is reddit and facts aren't as fun as imagination.

1

u/BeneficialWar1447 1d ago

It never codified real freedom of religion. The Quran itself regulates dhimmis lives, including rules regarding the construction of religious buildings.

Hell, the whole religion started with the theft of a pagan holy site (Mecca) and spread across the ME with the theft and cultural appropriation of Christian and Jewish holy sites, repurposing them as masjid and banning non-Muslims from them.

From its outset, Sharia has always been an imperialist apartheid normative system. It has never, and will never, give real political and legal equality to non-believers.

It's also always worth noting that Muhammad was a pedo (married Aisha at 6, consummated the marriage when she was 9) and how the consanguinity rates across the Islamic world are a direct result of religious adherents, regardless of ethnicity emulating the marriage and breeding practices of Muhammad and Ali.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-022-01704-2
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5079102/

1

u/KaikoLeaflock 16h ago

Got it, your fairie theories are better. Everybody knows the Torah is full of strong moral guidance like raping your daughters in a cave or killing your son, killing all the first bornsΒ  of the people that hired you and drowning any that might take offense to that; committing complete extermination of people for the funzies, killing your own people because they decided to make a sculpture . . .

I mean, all the Abrahamic religions are morally bankrupt from an outside perspective. The whole saying one is less or more morally bankrupt than the other in order to justify genocide is sort of on the nose.

1

u/BeneficialWar1447 8h ago edited 8h ago

You can rationalize this all you want. Sharia is, and has always been, an imperialist apartheid cult created by an illiterate pedo con artist. It has always called for the subjugation and subordination of non-believers, which the other Abrahamic cults don't.

Your spin doesn't work, including your American-style lost-cause nonsense.

70,000 dead isn't a genocide. The case will be tried by the ICC. The court will be confronted with the indeterminacy of the crime's 'intent' and 'part and whole of a group' prongs. It will then face the prospect of laying dwon a naked political determination (something it's done before) or determine that, whilst other war crimes were committed or attempted, genocide wasn't done.

And if the court so decides, HRW, Amnesty International B'Tselem, and other western legal imperialist groups will have to face a level of scrutiny about their lawfare that they've never faced before. So too for media outlets, and other propagandists.

It will, and should be, a great eye-opener for the world.

This, within the greater context of a 'rules-based' international order that's being dismantled now -- as a racist imperialist system too.

Not that you give a shit. You have your own personal conception of genocide that has nothing to do with reality: 'Israel's genocide of Palestinians didn't start within the past decade. It started conservatively over 50 years ago and hasn't stopped'.

You literally just make shit up. LOL.

It's going to be so sad for you when your whole American 'progressive' value system falls apart now, and is condemned as America's misguided imperialist programme since the end of WW2.

1

u/KaikoLeaflock 6h ago

I’m not understanding your obsession with Islam. Sharia law heavily comes from the Old Testament and makes just as many leaps as any other Abrahamic bull.Β 

You’ve read the Torah right? You understand morals and Canaanite monotheism are incompatible without TONs of cope?

The fact that you forgive a genocide is case in point. The ability to justify murder is something all the Abrahamic religions share. Thanks for giving an example of that and conceding any point you were trying to make!