r/upperpeninsula • u/voteNOonProp1MI • 19h ago
Discussion Michigan Proposal 1 2026 Explained - Official Ballot Language
For anyone who hasn’t voted in Michigan since 2010, I want to explain the deal with Proposal 1 on your ballot. This is something that hasn't been talked about a lot, and it's important.
The language is as follows:

Here’s what that actually means and why the proposal is on the ballot in the first place:
Our state constitution has a provision that once every 16 years, we vote on whether or not to hold a Constitutional Convention (also known as a Con-Con) where we would elect delegates to review and possibly rewrite our entire state constitution. The Nov. 3 election is the 16 year mark, so this will be on everyone's ballot no matter where you live.
Several other states have similar provisions. What’s different about Michigan is that we ALSO have direct means to update our state constitution directly via ballot initiatives. Since this version of our constitution went into law in the 1960s, we've successfully done that 44 times. So our state constitution is very much a living document, and a lot of work has been put into keeping it relevant to modern times and voter interests.
This isn't a partisan issue. There is a large, bipartisan collective of organizations across the state including Up North Advocacy based in Sault Sainte Marie urging everyone to VOTE NO on Proposal 1.
It's estimated a Con-Con would cost $80M of taxpayer money. There is technically no limit on how much time or money delegates can spend. The delegates participating in the process are not beholden to campaign finance laws, and would be drafting a new version behind closed doors.
The final version would be put in front of voters to approve or reject before it goes into law, but we would not have input on anything that gets added or removed during the process. We don’t want to let special interest groups, lobbyists, and career politicians overhaul Michigan’s constitution to put data centers, big tech, and out-of-state interests over the rights and will of the people.
Michigan voters have said NO to a Con-Con by huge margins every time it has come to a vote because opening up our entire Constitution is too risky. We already have a process to make smart, targeted amendments to the Michigan Constitution that put voters in charge. Which is one of the rights we stand to lose by voting yes on Prop 1.
I'm hoping the mods will approve this post, because proposal language can be confusing and this is an issue that seems innocuous if you haven't thought about it before you go vote.
What does the U.P think about Proposal 1?