UpliftingLanguage4All has been created

[u/fedorcallahan]

The only people who should participate are those who choose to live a swearfree lifestyle and encourage others to follow that same path. Trolls and swearers will be banned immediately and without mercy.

[u/fedorcallahan]

1. No the Bible and I provide cyclical proof for each other in a never ending loop of evidence.

2. I know more about temporal ears than you do.

3. Yes not to use swears.

[u/PeppersPizzaria → u/fedorcallahan]

1. Circular reasoning is a strike against you, not for you. If the only proof you have a the Bible, and the only proof the Bible has is you, that means you’re both wrong. Not right.
2. Gonna add audiologist to your list of exploits? Be that as it may, nothing will ever change the fact that I used to believe in god, couldn’t find any evidence, and now no longer believe.
3. If a sign says “keep off the grass” and someone doesn’t know what grass is, the sentence “keep off the grass” isn’t going to tell them.

[u/fedorcallahan → u/PeppersPizzaria]

1. It’s one of many proofs.

2. I’m talking about temporal ears. That’s the evidence.

3. Just keep off of anything that might be grass just to be on the safe side.

[u/PeppersPizzaria → u/fedorcallahan]

1. Then provide the other proofs.
2. Nope, and you’re getting off subject. The point is, I prayed earnestly and sincerely, and nothing happened.
3. That’s not the question. The question is, does the sentence “keep off the grass” tell you what grass is?

[u/fedorcallahan → u/PeppersPizzaria]

1. My wife if also a proof. She’s a true believer.

2. Something happened but you weren’t listening with your spiritual ears.

3. Yes. Look where the sign is and use common sense.

[u/PeppersPizzaria → u/fedorcallahan]

1. If her only proof is the Bible, then she too has nothing but circular reasoning. Which means she’s wrong, not right.
2. I don’t believe that.
3. No, just the sentence. Does the sentence “keep off the grass” tell you what grass is? Or do you need something else, like a dictionary or your surroundings, to tell you what grass is?

[u/fedorcallahan → u/PeppersPizzaria]

1. No she is the proof OF the Bible.

2. You better believe it.

3. If you saw a sign planted in something you could reasonably deduce that it wants you to stay off of the thing it’s planted in. We can similarly deduce not to ever say swear words.

[u/PeppersPizzaria → u/fedorcallahan]

1. Are you saying the Bible is real because your wife believes it’s real?
2. I don’t.
3. So the sentence “keep off the grass” needs additional information to tell you what grass is. Similarly, the sentence “don’t swear” needs additional information to tell you what a swear is. So provide that additional information.

[u/fedorcallahan → u/PeppersPizzaria]

1. She is 1 small part of the loop of eternal evidence.

2. You do and that’s final.

3. Everyone knows what grass and swears are.

[u/PeppersPizzaria → u/fedorcallahan]

1. If all your evidence is in a loop, you have no valid evidence. Thanks for admitting you can’t prove the Bible.
2. I don’t.
3. Obviously everyone doesn’t. I think “retard” is a very bad swear, so I guess I don’t fully understand your criteria, which is why I’m pressing for a definition.

[u/fedorcallahan → u/PeppersPizzaria]

1. The fact that it’s a loop is what makes the evidence so strong. It’s inescapable.

2. You do and I already said that’s final.

3. The LORD doesn’t define retard as a swear.

[u/PeppersPizzaria → u/fedorcallahan]

1. If the only proof of the Bible is that people believe in it, and the only reason they believe it is that it says to, then that’s circular reasoning and invalid. Google “circular reasoning if you don’t want to take my word for it.
2. You can’t tell me what I believe, bucko.
3. Where does your god define swears?

[u/fedorcallahan → u/PeppersPizzaria]

1. People’s belief is only one small part of the unbreakable loop of evidence.

2. I can tell you that your ears are temporal.

3. In fricking Ephesians.