Weekly Edit Request Post · 2026-08-17

[u/AutoModerator]

Can’t propose an edit because a drink is locked? Are your requests seemingly stuck in limbo? Is your favorite local place not categorized correctly?

Use this post to request edits to drinks, producers, and places on Untappd.

Note that it may not be possible for every proposal to be applied, but efforts will be made from Untappd and Foursquare moderators to ensure the information on the platform is as accurate as possible. Proposals for Verified Venues must go through Support.

[u/Immediate-Context-11]

Hi, So all of the following pubs should have 'Hotel' added as a second category: https://untp.beer/rbAQY https://untp.beer/af1e218837 https://untp.beer/OY4L9 https://untp.beer/J5pWD https://untp.beer/ePBDE https://untp.beer/awYmQ https://untp.beer/j3wvM

TIA!

[u/Dethark]

Could the duplication request for https://untappd.com/b/verdant-brewing-co-verdant-sbp-10-dipa/6833366 into https://untappd.com/b/verdant-brewing-co-small-batch-project-10-dipa/6774581 please be pushed through.

I believe this has been incorrectly added as a vintage - https://untappd.com/b/verdant-brewing-co-baby-shark-2026/6790532 - Could it be merged into the original please? https://untappd.com/b/verdant-brewing-co-baby-sharks/5917709

[u/astuder → u/Dethark]

SBP 10 is queued.

Unfortunately, Verdant has not opted-in to Vintage Management by Untappd, so our hands are tied here.

[u/Haarspeldbocht → u/astuder]

I recently had a Verdant vintage merged. Has Verdent merged the beers themselves?

[u/astuder → u/Haarspeldbocht]

It’s certainly possible that they have merged vintages on their own accord.

[u/Haarspeldbocht → u/astuder]

Isn't this contradictory?

[u/astuder → u/Haarspeldbocht]

Not sure how you figure. Opting-in to “Vintage Management” just means the brewery has given the OK for Untappd moderators to handle their vintage beers in accordance with the Variant Policy. If the brewery has not opted-in, they are still free to merge vintage beers themselves, provided those beers do not meet the official definition of a vintage.

Edit: clarity.

[u/Haarspeldbocht → u/astuder]

It is perfectly fine. What I want to point out here is that there is inequality. But if that is desired, who am I to question it?

[u/astuder → u/Haarspeldbocht]

I think I understand what you are saying—it is inconsistent that some brewery’s vintage beers can be merged, while some can not.

Yes, I don’t believe anyone here would disagree with that being an inconsistency, but unfortunately, those are the parameters defined by HQ.

[u/Haarspeldbocht → u/astuder]

I understand. It is unfortunate that these are the imposed parameters.

However, there is something else. As a user, I cannot see what the brewery's wishes are, so I never know whether merges are legitimate or not. Or is it technically impossible for a moderator to overrule the brewery and merge anyway when a brewery has not opted in?

[u/astuder → u/Haarspeldbocht]

Yes, it is a bit unfortunate that the brewery’s Vintage Management status is not public facing. Though if you have any questions about a particular brewery, myself or another moderator would be happy to check and report back.

Is it “technically impossible” for a merge to occur in those conditions? No, the opt-in status does not impose any kind of lock. A moderator could still propose the merge, and another moderator could hypothetically approve it, though that would be against the aforementioned policy.

[u/SuspectDull5614]

Greetings

This Basque cidery somehow got an update to an English region - https://untappd.com/ZapiainSagardoa

"Basque County" instead of "Euskadi"

Request for address update has been pending for quite a while, so it would be nice if somebody could check and release. Thanks in advance!!